scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Posted ContentDOI

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels are concordant across multiple platforms but are not fully predictive of sterilizing immunity

TL;DR: In this paper, the performance characteristics of the recently FDA authorized semi-quantitative anti-spike AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay compared to the FDA authorized anti-nucleocapsid Abbott Architect SARS CoV2 IgG, Roche elecsys Anti-SARS-coV-1-2-S, EuroImmun anti-Sars-cov-2 ELISA, and GenScript surrogate virus neutralization assays and examined the humoral response associated with vaccination.
Abstract: With the availability of widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, high-throughput quantitative anti-spike serological testing will likely become increasingly important. Here, we investigated the performance characteristics of the recently FDA authorized semi-quantitative anti-spike AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay compared to the FDA authorized anti-nucleocapsid Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Roche elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S, EuroImmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA, and GenScript surrogate virus neutralization assays and examined the humoral response associated with vaccination, natural protection, and breakthrough infection. The AdviseDx assay had a clinical sensitivity at 14 days post-symptom onset or 10 days post PCR detection of 95.6% (65/68, 95% CI: 87.8-98.8%) with two discrepant individuals seroconverting shortly thereafter. The AdviseDx assay demonstrated 100% positive percent agreement with the four other assays examined using the same symptom onset or PCR detection cutoffs. Using a recently available WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, we provide assay unit conversion factors to international units for each of the assays examined. We performed a longitudinal survey of healthy vaccinated individuals, finding median AdviseDx immunoglobulin levels peaked seven weeks post-first vaccine dose at approximately 4,000 IU/mL. Intriguingly, among the five assays examined, there was no significant difference in antigen binding level or neutralizing activity between two seropositive patients protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a previously described fishing vessel outbreak and five healthcare workers who experienced vaccine breakthrough of SARS-CoV-2 infection – all with variants of concern. These findings suggest that protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot currently be predicted exclusively using in vitro antibody assays against wildtype SARS-CoV-2 spike. Further work is required to establish protective correlates of protection for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

1
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels are concordant across multiple platforms but are not fully
1
predictive of sterilizing immunity
2
3
Benjamin T. Bradley
1
, Andrew Bryan
1
, Susan L. Fink
1
, Erin A. Goecker
1
, Pavitra Roychoudhury
1
,
4
Meei-Li Huang
1
, Haiying Zhu
1
, Anu Chaudhary
1
, Bhanupriya Madarampalli
1
, Joyce Y.C. Lu
1
, Kathy
5
Strand
2
, Estella Whimbey
2
, Chloe Bryson-Cahn
2
, Adrienne Schippers
2
, Nandita S. Mani
2
, Gregory
6
Pepper
1
, Keith R. Jerome
1,3
, Chihiro Morishima
1
, Robert W. Coombs
1,2
, Mark Wener
1
, Seth
7
Cohen
2
, Alexander L. Greninger
1,3 #
8
9
1
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center,
10
Seattle, WA
11
2
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical
12
Center, Seattle, WA
13
3
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
14
15
#
Corresponding author
16
Alexander L. Greninger, agrening@uw.edu
17
1616 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 320, Seattle, WA 98102
18
Phone: 415 439 3448, Fax: 206 616 4340
19
Running Title: anti-S assays
20
Keywords: Abbott Architect, SARS-CoV-2, spike protein, spike IgG, serology, COVID-19,
21
coronavirus
22
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.26.21256118doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.

2
Abstract
23
With the availability of widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, high-throughput quantitative anti-
24
spike serological testing will likely become increasingly important. Here, we investigated the
25
performance characteristics of the recently FDA authorized semi-quantitative anti-spike
26
AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay compared to the FDA authorized anti-nucleocapsid Abbott
27
Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Roche elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S, EuroImmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2
28
ELISA, and GenScript surrogate virus neutralization assays and examined the humoral response
29
associated with vaccination, natural protection, and breakthrough infection. The AdviseDx
30
assay had a clinical sensitivity at 14 days post-symptom onset or 10 days post PCR detection of
31
95.6% (65/68, 95% CI: 87.8-98.8%) with two discrepant individuals seroconverting shortly
32
thereafter. The AdviseDx assay demonstrated 100% positive percent agreement with the four
33
other assays examined using the same symptom onset or PCR detection cutoffs. Using a
34
recently available WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody, we provide assay
35
unit conversion factors to international units for each of the assays examined. We performed a
36
longitudinal survey of healthy vaccinated individuals, finding median AdviseDx immunoglobulin
37
levels peaked seven weeks post-first vaccine dose at approximately 4,000 IU/mL. Intriguingly,
38
among the five assays examined, there was no significant difference in antigen binding level or
39
neutralizing activity between two seropositive patients protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection
40
in a previously described fishing vessel outbreak and five healthcare workers who experienced
41
vaccine breakthrough of SARS-CoV-2 infection all with variants of concern. These findings
42
suggest that protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot currently be predicted exclusively
43
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.26.21256118doi: medRxiv preprint

3
using
in vitro
antibody assays against wildtype SARS-CoV-2 spike. Further work is required to
44
establish protective corre lates of protection for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
45
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.26.21256118doi: medRxiv preprint

4
Introduction
46
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) the etiologic agent of
47
coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is responsible for an ongoing global pandemic. In addition to
48
infection control measures such as social distancing and masking, controlling the spread of the
49
outbreak will require a global vaccination campaign. Currently, three vaccines have received
50
FDA emergency use authorization with other candidates in late-phase clinical trials (1).
51
Common to all vaccine candidates is the inclusion of the receptor binding domain (RBD) or full-
52
length spike (S) of SARS-CoV-2 (2).
53
54
For SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses, antibodies to the RBD of the spike protein have
55
demonstrated potent neutralizing activity at nanomolar concentrations (3, 4). In a recent meta-
56
analysis of individuals with naturally-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection, neutralizing antibodies
57
were first detectable between seven to 15 days following symptom onset (5). Despite questions
58
regarding the durability of the antibody response and documented cases of reinfection,
59
longitudinal analysis of IgG levels and neutralizing potency suggest immunity persists in most
60
individuals for as long a time period as has been examinable to date (6, 7). However, some
61
individuals, including those who are older or immunosuppressed, may be at risk for a
62
suboptimal response to vaccination (8, 9).
63
64
The presence of neutralizing antibodies due to prior infection or vaccination has been shown to
65
be a correlate of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection (10–12). Although Phase III vaccine
66
trials demonstrated excellent efficacies among treated populations (13, 14), a number of
67
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.26.21256118doi: medRxiv preprint

5
subpopulations including pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals were
68
excluded from these trials. Moreover, uncertainty exists over the durability of protection after
69
vaccination (15). High-throughput, widely available laboratory measurements of protective
70
correlates would be extremely helpful in these and other populations. The current gold-
71
standard test, known as the plaque reduction neutralization assay (PRNA), is resource intensive
72
and requires BSL-3 conditions for testing. Currently, one surrogate neutralization assay has
73
received EUA-approval for clinical use. While this assay can be performed in BSL-2 laboratories
74
and has shown excellent correlation to PRNAs, it also suffers from similar limitations of
75
throughput and cost (16). The most widely used clinical platforms for monitoring immunity to
76
vaccine-preventable diseases including hepatitis B virus, measles virus, and varicella-zoster
77
virus are high-throughput, low-cost immunoassay analyzers, including the Roche cobas, Abbott
78
Architect, and Diasorin XL platforms, among others. Recently, the Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2
79
IgG II assay received emergency use authorization by the FDA. This chemiluminescent
80
microparticle immunoassay (CIMA) for the Abbott Architect platform is designed for semi-
81
quantitative detection of IgG class antibodies to the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
82
83
Our laboratory previously examined the clinical performance characteristics of the anti-N SARS-
84
CoV-2 IgG assay for the Abbott Architect and found it to have adequate performance for
85
determining prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in a hospitalized cohort (17). However, this assay is
86
qualitative and designed to detect antibodies to the nucleocapsid, precluding the ability to
87
monitor vaccine response. In this study we examine the performance of the AdviseDx SARS-
88
CoV-2 IgG II assay and correlate its performance to four other assays (Abbott Architect SARS-
89
. CC-BY 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review)
The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 29, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.26.21256118doi: medRxiv preprint

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a validated antibody assay against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was used to determine a high seroconversion rate (94%) in 200 patients with cancer in New York City that had received full dosing with one of the FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines.

250 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Zhou et al. as discussed by the authors investigated mRNA-vaccine-induced antibody responses against the reference strain, seven variants, and seasonal coronaviruses in 168 healthy individuals at three time points: before vaccination, after the first dose, and after the second dose.

28 citations

Posted ContentDOI
16 Sep 2021-medRxiv
TL;DR: In this article, a cross-sectional cohort study of 126 patients with hematologic malignancies in the outpatient practices of the institution who completed their vaccination series with one of the three FDA EUA COVID-19 vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer, or Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
Abstract: It is well established that COVID-19 carries a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies, however, very little data on ethnicity specific responses in this particular patient population currently exist. We established a program of rapid vaccination and evaluation of antibody-mediated response to all EUA COVID-19 vaccines in an inner city minority population to determine the factors that contribute to the poor seroconversion to COVID-19 vaccination in this population. We conducted a cross-sectional cohort study of 126 patients with hematologic malignancies in the outpatient practices of our institution who completed their vaccination series with one of the three FDA EUA COVID-19 vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer, or Johnson & Johnson (J&J). We qualitatively measured Spike IgG production in all patients using the AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay and quantitatively in 106 patients who completed their vaccination series with at least 14 days after the 2nd dose of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines or 28d after the single J&J vaccine. Patient characteristics were analyzed using standard descriptive statistics and associations between patient characteristics, cancer subtypes, treatments, and vaccine response were assessed using Fisher Exact test or Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum test. The majority of patients (74%) were minorities. Seventy patients (60%) received Pfizer, 36 patients (31%) Moderna, and 10 patients (9%) J&J. We observed a high-rate of seropositivity (86%) with 16 pts (14%) having a negative Spike IgG. Of the 86 minority patients included, 94% Blacks (30/32) and 87% (39/45) Hispanics showed seropositivity. The factors that contributed to significantly lower seroconversion rates included patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (p=0.005), those who received cytotoxic chemotherapy (p=0.002), IVIG (p=0.01), CAR-T cell therapy (p=0.00002), and CD20 monoclonal antibodies (Ab) (p=0.0000008). Plasma cell neoplasms (p=0.02), immunomodulatory agents (p=0.01), and proteasome inhibitors (p=0.01) had significantly higher seroconversion rates, and those with a history of prior COVID-19 (11%, 12/106) had significantly higher antibody titers (p=0.0003). The positivity rate was 86% (37 seropositive, 6 seronegative) for autologous HSCT and 75% (3 seropositive, 1 seronegative) for allogeneic HSCT. No life-threatening AE were observed. We show high seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in non-White patients with hematologic malignancies treated with a wide spectrum of therapeutic modalities. Vaccination is safe, effective, and should be encouraged in most patients with hematologic malignancies. Our minorities based study could be employed as an educational tool to dispel myths and provide data driven evidence to overcome vaccine hesitancy.

3 citations

Posted ContentDOI
19 Jun 2021-bioRxiv
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the mRNA vaccine-induced antibody responses against the referent WIV04 (Wuhan) strain, circulating variants, and human endemic coronaviruses in 168 naive and previously infected people at three-time points.
Abstract: With the advance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the outlook for overcoming the global COVID-19 pandemic has improved. However, understanding of immunity and protection offered by the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against circulating variants of concern (VOC) is rapidly evolving. We investigated the mRNA vaccine-induced antibody responses against the referent WIV04 (Wuhan) strain, circulating variants, and human endemic coronaviruses in 168 naive and previously infected people at three-time points. Samples were collected prior to vaccination, after the first and after the second doses of one of the two available mRNA-based vaccines. After full vaccination, both naive and previously infected participants developed comparable robust SARS-CoV-2 specific spike IgG levels, modest IgM and IgA binding antibodies, and varying degrees of HCoV cross-reactive antibodies. However, the strength and frequency of neutralizing antibodies produced in naive people were significantly lower than in the previously infected group. We also found that 1/3rd of previously infected people had undetectable neutralizing antibodies after the first vaccine dose; 40% of this group developed neutralizing antibodies after the second dose. In all subjects neutralizing antibodies produced against the B.1.351 and P.1 variants were weaker than those produced against the reference and B.1.1.7 strains. Our findings provide support for future booster vaccinations modified to be active against the circulating variants.

2 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older and safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines.
Abstract: Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a world...

10,274 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The mRNA-1273 vaccine as discussed by the authors is a lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19.
Abstract: Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.).

2,721 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
18 Jun 2020-Nature
TL;DR: Most convalescent plasma samples obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity, and rare but recurring RBD-specific antibodies with potent antiviral activity were found in all individuals tested, suggesting that a vaccine designed to elicit such antibodies could be broadly effective.
Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infected millions of people and claimed hundreds of thousands of lives Virus entry into cells depends on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) Although there is no vaccine, it is likely that antibodies will be essential for protection However, little is known about the human antibody response to SARS-CoV-21-5 Here we report on 149 COVID-19 convalescent individuals Plasmas collected an average of 39 days after the onset of symptoms had variable half-maximal pseudovirus neutralizing titres: less than 1:50 in 33% and below 1:1,000 in 79%, while only 1% showed titres above 1:5,000 Antibody sequencing revealed expanded clones of RBD-specific memory B cells expressing closely related antibodies in different individuals Despite low plasma titres, antibodies to three distinct epitopes on RBD neutralized at half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) as low as single digit nanograms per millitre Thus, most convalescent plasmas obtained from individuals who recover from COVID-19 do not contain high levels of neutralizing activity Nevertheless, rare but recurring RBD-specific antibodies with potent antiviral activity were found in all individuals tested, suggesting that a vaccine designed to elicit such antibodies could be broadly effective

1,675 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Sep 2020-Nature
TL;DR: The development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is reviewed, including an overview of the development process, the different types of vaccine candidate, and data from animal studies as well as phase I and II clinical trials in humans.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in late 2019 in China and is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To mitigate the effects of the virus on public health, the economy and society, a vaccine is urgently needed. Here I review the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Development was initiated when the genetic sequence of the virus became available in early January 2020, and has moved at an unprecedented speed: a phase I trial started in March 2020 and there are currently more than 180 vaccines at various stages of development. Data from phase I and phase II trials are already available for several vaccine candidates, and many have moved into phase III trials. The data available so far suggest that effective and safe vaccines might become available within months, rather than years. The development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is reviewed, including an overview of the development process, the different types of vaccine candidate, and data from animal studies as well as phase I and II clinical trials in humans.

1,515 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
04 Dec 2020-Science
TL;DR: The vast majority of infected individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 experience robust immunoglobulin G antibody responses against the viral spike protein, and titers are relatively stable for at least a period of about 5 months and that anti-spike binding titers significantly correlate with neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic with millions infected and more than 1 million fatalities. Questions regarding the robustness, functionality, and longevity of the antibody response to the virus remain unanswered. Here, on the basis of a dataset of 30,082 individuals screened at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City, we report that the vast majority of infected individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 experience robust immunoglobulin G antibody responses against the viral spike protein. We also show that titers are relatively stable for at least a period of about 5 months and that anti-spike binding titers significantly correlate with neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2. Our data suggest that more than 90% of seroconverters make detectable neutralizing antibody responses. These titers remain relatively stable for several months after infection.

974 citations

Related Papers (5)