scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Antiseptic mouthwash for gonorrhoea prevention (OMEGA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The OMEGA trial as mentioned in this paper compared the efficacy of Listerine and Biotene mouthwashes for preventing gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men (MSM).
Abstract
Summary Background To address the increasing incidence of gonorrhoea and antimicrobial resistance, we compared the efficacy of Listerine and Biotene mouthwashes for preventing gonorrhoea among men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods The OMEGA trial was a multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind randomised controlled trial among MSM, done at three urban sexual health clinics and one general practice clinic in Australia. Men were eligible if they were diagnosed with oropharyngeal gonorrhoea by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) in the previous 30 days or were aged 16–24 years. They were randomly assigned to receive Listerine (intervention) or Biotene (control) via a computer-generated sequence (1:1 ratio, block size of four). Participants, clinicians, data collectors, data analysts, and outcome adjudicators were masked to the interventions after assignment. Participants were instructed to rinse and gargle with 20 mL of mouthwash for 60 s at least once daily for 12 weeks. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected by research nurses every 6 weeks, and participants provided saliva samples every 3 weeks, to be tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae with NAAT and quantitative PCR. The primary outcome was proportion of MSM diagnosed with oropharyngeal N gonorrhoeae infection at any point over the 12-week period, defined as a positive result for either oropharyngeal swabs or saliva samples by NAAT, and the cumulative incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea at the week 12 visit. A modified intention-to-treat analysis for the primary outcome was done that included men who provided at least one follow-up specimen over the 12-week study period. The trial was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000247471). Findings Between March 30, 2016, and Oct 26, 2018, 786 MSM were screened and 256 were excluded. 264 MSM were randomly assigned to the Biotene group and 266 to the Listerine group. The analysis population included 227 (86%) men in the Biotene group and 219 (82%) in the Listerine group. Oropharyngeal gonorrhoea was detected in ten (4%) of 227 of MSM in the Biotene group and in 15 (7%) of 219 in the Listerine group (adjusted risk difference 2·5%, 95% CI −1·8 to 6·8). The cumulative incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea at the week 12 visit did not differ between the two mouthwash groups (adjusted risk difference 3·1%, 95% CI −1·4 to 7·7). Interpretation Listerine did not reduce the incidence of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea compared with Biotene. However, previous research suggests that mouthwash might reduce the infectivity of oropharyngeal gonorrhoea; therefore, further studies of mouthwash examining its inhibitory effect on N gonorrhoeae are warranted to determine if it has a potential role for the prevention of transmission. Funding Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Anti-Virulence Therapeutic Approaches for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

TL;DR: A review highlighting the growing research interest in developing anti-virulence therapies (AVTs) which are directed towards inhibiting virulence factors to prevent infection is presented in this paper, where it is hypothesized that this will impart a smaller selective pressure for the emergence of resistance in the pathogen and in the microbiome, thus avoiding AMR development to the antiinfective.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead

TL;DR: Overall, this Commission aims to enhance the understanding of some of the key challenges facing the field of STI treatment and control, and outlines new approaches to improve the clinical management of STIs and public health.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratios from complex survey data.

TL;DR: This paper shows how model-adjusted risks, risk differences, and risk ratio estimates can be obtained directly from logistic regression models in the complex sample survey setting to yield population-based inferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Computing Adjusted Risk Ratios and Risk Differences in Stata

TL;DR: In this article, a post-estimation command, adjrr, is proposed to calculate adjusted risk ratios and adjusted risk differences after running a logit or probit model with a binary, a multinomial, or an ordered outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

World Health Organization Global Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (WHO GASP): review of new data and evidence to inform international collaborative actions and research efforts

TL;DR: The World Health Organization GASP data from 67 countries in 2015-16 is described, confirmed gonorrhoea treatment failures with ceftriaxone with or without azithromycin or doxycycline, and international collaborative actions and research efforts essential for the effective management and control of gonor rhoea are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Community-level changes in condom use and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia: results of repeated behavioural surveillance in 2013-17.

TL;DR: A rapid increase in PrEP use by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney was accompanied by an equally rapid decrease in consistent condom use, and other jurisdictions should consider the potential for community-level increases in CAIC when modelling the introduction of PrEP and in monitoring its effect.
Related Papers (5)