Search or ask a question
Pricing
Login
Sign up
Home
Notebook
BETA
Profile
Citation booster
Literature Review
Copilot
Citation generator
Paraphraser
AI Detector
Chrome Extension
Talk with us
Use on ChatGPT
All figures (17)
Table 3. Fiber characteristics (data provided by the manufacturer).
Table 4. Compressive strength and residual flexural tensile strengths.
Table 1. Constitutive models in European guidelines.
Fig. 7. Test setup.
Fig. 11. (a) fib Model Code 2010 and (b) assumption made for some cases.
Table 2. Characteristics of the constitutive models from guidelines.
Fig. 10. Failure mechanism of: a) 4-point bending test (unnotched specimen) and b) 3-point bending test (notched specimen).
Fig. 1. Constitutive models (σ-ε) for the characterization of the tensile behavior of FRC [20, 22, 23].
Fig. 2. Constitituve models (σ-w) for the tensile behavior of FRC [24-27].
Table 7. PF_0.50: Load values for displacements of 6 mm, 15 mm and 45 mm (in kN).
Fig. 9. (a) Discretization of the slab and (b) generic moment-curvature diagram.
Fig. 4. Simplified constitutive laws (σ-w): a) Rigid-plastic and b) linear-elastic.
Fig. 3. Constitutive models (σ-w) for the tensile response of FRC [28 and 15].
Fig. 8. (a) Sectional discretization; (b) FRC and (c) steel bar constitutive equations
Fig. 5. Definition of the parameter “y” for a) sections with traditional reinforcement and b) section without traditional reinforcement.
Fig. 12. Experimental P-δ curve and prediction for slab RC.
Table 5. RC slab: Load values for displacements of 6 mm, 15 mm and 45 mm (in kN).
Journal Article
•
DOI
•
Application of constitutive models in European codes to RC–FRC
[...]
Ana Blanco
1
,
Pablo Pujadas
1
,
Albert de la Fuente
1
,
Sergio H.P. Cavalaro
1
,
Antonio Aguado
1
- Show less
+1 more
•
Institutions (1)
Polytechnic University of Catalonia
1
01 Mar 2013
-
Construction and Building Materials