Assessment of the Suitability of Fog Computing in the Context of Internet of Things
TL;DR: Results show that as the number of applications demanding real-time service increases, the fog computing paradigm outperforms traditional cloud computing.
Abstract: This work performs a rigorous, comparative analysis of the fog computing paradigm and the conventional cloud computing paradigm in the context of the Internet of Things (IoT), by mathematically formulating the parameters and characteristics of fog computing—one of the first attempts of its kind. With the rapid increase in the number of Internet-connected devices, the increased demand of real-time, low-latency services is proving to be challenging for the traditional cloud computing framework. Also, our irreplaceable dependency on cloud computing demands the cloud data centers (DCs) always to be up and running which exhausts huge amount of power and yield tons of carbon dioxide ( $\text{CO}_2$ ) gas. In this work, we assess the applicability of the newly proposed fog computing paradigm to serve the demands of the latency-sensitive applications in the context of IoT. We model the fog computing paradigm by mathematically characterizing the fog computing network in terms of power consumption, service latency, $\text{CO}_2$ emission, and cost, and evaluating its performance for an environment with high number of Internet-connected devices demanding real-time service. A case study is performed with traffic generated from the $100$ highest populated cities being served by eight geographically distributed DCs. Results show that as the number of applications demanding real-time service increases, the fog computing paradigm outperforms traditional cloud computing. For an environment with $50$ percent applications requesting for instantaneous, real-time services, the overall service latency for fog computing is noted to decrease by $50.09$ percent. However, it is mentionworthy that for an environment with less percentage of applications demanding for low-latency services, fog computing is observed to be an overhead compared to the traditional cloud computing. Therefore, the work shows that in the context of IoT, with high number of latency-sensitive applications fog computing outperforms cloud computing.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a simulator, called iFogSim, to model IoT and fog environments and measure the impact of resource management techniques in latency, network congestion, energy consumption, and cost.
Abstract: Summary
Internet of Things (IoT) aims to bring every object (eg, smart cameras, wearable, environmental sensors, home appliances, and vehicles) online, hence generating massive volume of data that can overwhelm storage systems and data analytics applications. Cloud computing offers services at the infrastructure level that can scale to IoT storage and processing requirements. However, there are applications such as health monitoring and emergency response that require low latency, and delay that is caused by transferring data to the cloud and then back to the application can seriously impact their performances. To overcome this limitation, Fog computing paradigm has been proposed, where cloud services are extended to the edge of the network to decrease the latency and network congestion. To realize the full potential of Fog and IoT paradigms for real-time analytics, several challenges need to be addressed. The first and most critical problem is designing resource management techniques that determine which modules of analytics applications are pushed to each edge device to minimize the latency and maximize the throughput. To this end, we need an evaluation platform that enables the quantification of performance of resource management policies on an IoT or Fog computing infrastructure in a repeatable manner. In this paper we propose a simulator, called iFogSim, to model IoT and Fog environments and measure the impact of resource management techniques in latency, network congestion, energy consumption, and cost. We describe two case studies to demonstrate modeling of an IoT environment and comparison of resource management policies. Moreover, scalability of the simulation toolkit of RAM consumption and execution time is verified under different circumstances.
1,085 citations
TL;DR: This paper provides a tutorial on fog computing and its related computing paradigms, including their similarities and differences, and provides a taxonomy of research topics in fog computing.
783 citations
Cites background from "Assessment of the Suitability of Fo..."
...A three-layer general logical architecture for fog computing is introduced in [88] and [89]....
[...]
TL;DR: In this paper, the challenges in fog computing acting as an intermediate layer between IoT devices/sensors and cloud datacentres and review the current developments in this field are discussed.
Abstract: In recent years, the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices/sensors has increased to a great extent. To support the computational demand of real-time latency-sensitive applications of largely geo-distributed IoT devices/sensors, a new computing paradigm named "Fog computing" has been introduced. Generally, Fog computing resides closer to the IoT devices/sensors and extends the Cloud-based computing, storage and networking facilities. In this chapter, we comprehensively analyse the challenges in Fogs acting as an intermediate layer between IoT devices/ sensors and Cloud datacentres and review the current developments in this field. We present a taxonomy of Fog computing according to the identified challenges and its key features.We also map the existing works to the taxonomy in order to identify current research gaps in the area of Fog computing. Moreover, based on the observations, we propose future directions for research.
669 citations
TL;DR: This work forms the computation offloading decision, resource allocation and content caching strategy as an optimization problem, considering the total revenue of the network, and develops an alternating direction method of multipliers-based algorithm to solve the optimization problem.
Abstract: Mobile edge computing has risen as a promising technology for augmenting the computational capabilities of mobile devices Meanwhile, in-network caching has become a natural trend of the solution of handling exponentially increasing Internet traffic The important issues in these two networking paradigms are computation offloading and content caching strategies, respectively In order to jointly tackle these issues in wireless cellular networks with mobile edge computing, we formulate the computation offloading decision, resource allocation and content caching strategy as an optimization problem, considering the total revenue of the network Furthermore, we transform the original problem into a convex problem and then decompose it in order to solve it in a distributed and efficient way Finally, with recent advances in distributed convex optimization, we develop an alternating direction method of multipliers-based algorithm to solve the optimization problem The effectiveness of the proposed scheme is demonstrated by simulation results with different system parameters
611 citations
TL;DR: Fog computing is not a substitute for cloud computing but a powerful complement as discussed by the authors, which enables processing at the edge while still offering the possibility to interact with the cloud. But it still faces several challenges, such as the distance between the cloud and the end devices.
Abstract: Cloud computing with its three key facets (i.e., Infrastructure-as-a-Service, Platform-as-a-Service, and Software-as-a-Service) and its inherent advantages (e.g., elasticity and scalability) still faces several challenges. The distance between the cloud and the end devices might be an issue for latency-sensitive applications such as disaster management and content delivery applications. Service level agreements (SLAs) may also impose processing at locations where the cloud provider does not have data centers. Fog computing is a novel paradigm to address such issues. It enables provisioning resources and services outside the cloud, at the edge of the network, closer to end devices, or eventually, at locations stipulated by SLAs. Fog computing is not a substitute for cloud computing but a powerful complement. It enables processing at the edge while still offering the possibility to interact with the cloud. This paper presents a comprehensive survey on fog computing. It critically reviews the state of the art in the light of a concise set of evaluation criteria. We cover both the architectures and the algorithms that make fog systems. Challenges and research directions are also introduced. In addition, the lessons learned are reviewed and the prospects are discussed in terms of the key role fog is likely to play in emerging technologies such as tactile Internet.
598 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a cloud centric vision for worldwide implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) and present a Cloud implementation using Aneka, which is based on interaction of private and public Clouds, and conclude their IoT vision by expanding on the need for convergence of WSN, the Internet and distributed computing directed at technological research community.
9,593 citations
17 Aug 2012
TL;DR: This paper argues that the above characteristics make the Fog the appropriate platform for a number of critical Internet of Things services and applications, namely, Connected Vehicle, Smart Grid, Smart Cities, and, in general, Wireless Sensors and Actuators Networks (WSANs).
Abstract: Fog Computing extends the Cloud Computing paradigm to the edge of the network, thus enabling a new breed of applications and services. Defining characteristics of the Fog are: a) Low latency and location awareness; b) Wide-spread geographical distribution; c) Mobility; d) Very large number of nodes, e) Predominant role of wireless access, f) Strong presence of streaming and real time applications, g) Heterogeneity. In this paper we argue that the above characteristics make the Fog the appropriate platform for a number of critical Internet of Things (IoT) services and applications, namely, Connected Vehicle, Smart Grid, Smart Cities, and, in general, Wireless Sensors and Actuators Networks (WSANs).
4,440 citations
01 Jan 2019
TL;DR: This chapter argues that the above characteristics make the Fog the appropriate platform for a number of critical internet of things services and applications, namely connected vehicle, smart grid, smart cities, and in general, wireless sensors and actuators networks (WSANs).
Abstract: Fog computing extends the cloud computing paradigm to the edge of the network, thus enabling a new breed of applications and services. Defining characteristics of the Fog are 1) low latency and location awareness, 2) widespread geographical distribution, 3) mobility, 4) very large number of nodes, 5) predominant role of wireless access, 6) strong presence of streaming and real time applications, and 7) heterogeneity. In this chapter, the authors argue that the above characteristics make the Fog the appropriate platform for a number of critical internet of things (IoT) services and applications, namely connected vehicle, smart grid, smart cities, and in general, wireless sensors and actuators networks (WSANs).
2,384 citations
"Assessment of the Suitability of Fo..." refers background in this paper
...In [42], the authors defined the characteristics of the paradigm in terms of latency, location awareness, geographical distribution, mobility, heterogeneity, and the predominant access to wireless devices....
[...]
TL;DR: A framework for the realization of smart cities through the Internet of Things (IoT), which encompasses the complete urban information system, from the sensory level and networking support structure through to data management and Cloud-based integration of respective systems and services, and forms a transformational part of the existing cyber-physical system.
Abstract: Increasing population density in urban centers demands adequate provision of services and infrastructure to meet the needs of city inhabitants, encompassing residents, workers, and visitors. The utilization of information and communications technologies to achieve this objective presents an opportunity for the development of smart cities, where city management and citizens are given access to a wealth of real-time information about the urban environment upon which to base decisions, actions, and future planning. This paper presents a framework for the realization of smart cities through the Internet of Things (IoT). The framework encompasses the complete urban information system, from the sensory level and networking support structure through to data management and Cloud-based integration of respective systems and services, and forms a transformational part of the existing cyber-physical system. This IoT vision for a smart city is applied to a noise mapping case study to illustrate a new method for existing operations that can be adapted for the enhancement and delivery of important city services.
1,178 citations
"Assessment of the Suitability of Fo..." refers background in this paper
...Thus, by 2020, it is estimated that a large number of applications will be required to be processed and served through the technology of IoT [14], [15]....
[...]
TL;DR: OpenNebula as mentioned in this paper is an open source, virtual infrastructure manager that deploys virtualized services on both a local pool of resources and external IaaS clouds, providing features not found in other cloud software or virtualization-based data center management software.
Abstract: One of the many definitions of "cloud" is that of an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) system, in which IT infrastructure is deployed in a provider's data center as virtual machines. With IaaS clouds' growing popularity, tools and technologies are emerging that can transform an organization's existing infrastructure into a private or hybrid cloud. OpenNebula is an open source, virtual infrastructure manager that deploys virtualized services on both a local pool of resources and external IaaS clouds. Haizea, a resource lease manager, can act as a scheduling back end for OpenNebula, providing features not found in other cloud software or virtualization-based data center management software.
1,068 citations
Additional excerpts
...A good number of works [24]–[28] on cloud computing illustrates the detailed underlying process behind the provisioning of cloud services....
[...]