Asset Liquidity and Mutual Fund Management Fees: Evidence from Closed-End Mutual Funds
TL;DR: In this article, the authors assess whether the liquidity of a closed-end mutual fund's investments is related to the management fee charged by the fund's investment advisor and find a significantly positive relationship between the percentage of level 3 assets (the least liquid securities) and management fees.
Abstract: In this study, we assess whether the liquidity of a closed-end mutual fund’s investments (measured based on the fund’s fair value disclosures) is related to the management fee charged by the fund’s investment advisor. We posit that there will be incremental effort on the part of the advisor to identify and analyze less liquid investments, and that fund investors would be willing to pay for these incremental costs to access less-liquid segments of the market. Consistent with this expectation, we find a significantly positive relationship between the percentage of level 3 assets (the least liquid securities) and management fees. However, we do not find a significant relationship between level 2 securities (which are more liquid than level 3, but less liquid than level 1) and management fees. Overall, our results suggest that investments in the least liquid securities result in higher management fees.
Citations
More filters
01 May 2018
3 citations
31 Mar 2019
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the efficiency of mutual funds due to their substantial role in the growth of economy and found that a significant boost has been noticed in efficiency of the initial year but it decreased afterward.
Abstract: Mutual funds have a significant role as an institutional investor to allocate funds in an efficient way. Therefore, this study examines efficiency of mutual funds due to their substantial role in the growth of economy. Technical Efficiency (TE), Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE), and Scale Efficiency (SE) of mutual funds are examined over the period of 2011 to 2016 by following Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results showed a TE of 70.6%, PTE of 73%, and SE of 96.3% in mutual funds of Pakistan. A significant boost has been noticed in the efficiency of the initial year but it decreased afterward. Decreasing return to scale is found 52.40% whereas, increasing return to scale are found 17.41%. There were only 30.19% mutual funds which are working on right scale. It suggests that regulators need to closely monitor mutual funds since unplanned growth in size of mutual funds will damage the overall efficiency since the decreasing return to scale are
3 citations
Cites methods from "Asset Liquidity and Mutual Fund Man..."
...Total assets are also considered important input variable in the current study by following previous literature (Cullinan & Zheng, 2012)....
[...]
References
More filters
TL;DR: The authors argue that the separation of decision and risk-bearing functions observed in large corporations is common to other organizations such as large professional partnerships, financial mutuals, and nonprofits. But they do not consider the role of decision agents in these organizations.
Abstract: ABSENT fiat, the form of organization that survives in an activity is the one that delivers the product demanded by customers at the lowest price while covering costs.1 Our goal is to explain the survival of organizations characterized by separation of "ownership" and "control"-a problem that has bothered students of corporations from Adam Smith to Berle and Means and Jensen and Meckling.2 In more precise language, we are concerned with the survival of organizations in which important decision agents do not bear a substantial share of the wealth effects of their decisions. We argue that the separation of decision and risk-bearing functions observed in large corporations is common to other organizations such as large professional partnerships, financial mutuals, and nonprofits. We contend that separation of decision and risk-bearing functions survives in these organizations in part because of the benefits of specialization of
14,045 citations
TL;DR: Jensen and Fama as mentioned in this paper developed a set of propositions that explaim the special features of the residual claims of different organizational forms as efficient approaches to controlling agency problems and explained the survival of organizational forms in specific activities.
Abstract: Social and economic activities, like religion, entertainment, education, research, and the production of other goods and services, are carried on by different types of organizations, for example, corporations, proprietorships, partnerships, mutuals and nonprofits. There is competition among organizational forms for survival. The form of organization that survives in an activity is the one that delivers the product demanded by customers at the lowest price while covering costs. The characteristics of residual claims are important both in distinguishing organizations from one another and in explaining the survival of organizational forms in specific activities. This paper develops a set of propositions that explaim the special features of the residual claims of different organizational forms as efficient approaches to controlling agency problems. © M. C. Jensen and E. F. Fama, 1983 Michael C. Jensen, Foundations of Organizational Strategy Chapter 6, Harvard University Press, 1998. Journal of Law & Economics, Vol XXVI (June 1983) This document is available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) Electronic Library at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/paper.taf?ABSTRACT_ID=94032 AGENCY PROBLEMS AND RESIDUAL CLAIMS
3,594 citations
TL;DR: A number of solutions to this problem have been proposed, most revolving around bonding mechanisms as mentioned in this paper, however, consumers must react to the delivery of less-than-promised quality.
Abstract: U NLESS quality is apparent at the point of sale, the market must find ways to ensure the delivery of high-quality products; otherwise, producers have incentives to sell low-quality goods at high-quality prices, thereby assuring a degenerate equilibrium.1 Various solutions to this problem have been proposed, most revolving around bonding mechanisms.2 For bonds to work, however, consumers must react to the delivery of less-than-promised quality.3 In general, the faster consumers detect and react to delivery of low-quality products, the more efficient the market is in delivering high-quality products.4 Despite its prominence in the theoretical literature, direct evidence of consumer response to less-than-promised quality is rarely measured. This is a shortcoming presumably attributable to the difficulty of measuring both the difference between expected and actual product quality and
1,110 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a statistically significant indirect cost in the form of a negative relation between a fund's abnormal return and investor flows was found, and the common finding of negative return performance at open-end mutual funds is attributable to the costs of liquidity-motivated trading.
758 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a new method of testing asset pricing models that relies on using quantities rather than prices or returns, and derive a simple test statistic that allows them to infer, from a set of candidate models, the model that is closest to the true risk model.
727 citations