scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Quantitative evidence is provided to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of MM and an MRD-negative status after treatment for newly diagnosed MM is associated with long-term survival.
Abstract: Importance Numerous studies have evaluated the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Most studies were small and varied in terms of patient population, treatment, and MRD assessment methods. Objective To evaluate the utility of MRD detection in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Data Sources A Medline search was conducted for articles published in English between January 1990 and January 2016. Study Selection Eligible studies reported MRD status and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in 20 or more patients following treatment. Among 405 articles identified, 21 met the initial eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis Information on patient characteristics, treatment, MRD assessment, and outcomes were extracted using a standard form. Main Outcomes and Measures The impact of MRD status on PFS and OS was assessed by pooling data from relevant trials. Data were adjusted to allow for different proportions of patients with MRD in different studies, and analyzed using the Peto method. Forest plots were created based on Cox model analysis. Other prespecified research questions were addressed qualitatively. Results Fourteen studies (n = 1273) provided data on the impact of MRD on PFS, and 12 studies (n = 1100) on OS. Results were reported specifically in patients who had achieved conventional complete response (CR) in 5 studies for PFS (n = 574) and 6 studies for OS (n = 616). An MRD-negative status was associated with significantly better PFS overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.36-0.48; P P P P Conclusions and Relevance Minimal residual disease-negative status after treatment for newly diagnosed MM is associated with long-term survival. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of MM.

Summary (1 min read)

Jump to: [Article:] and [Reuse]

Article:

  • Munshi, NC, Avet-Loiseau, H, Rawstron, AC et al. (8 more authors) (2017) Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.
  • This is an author produced version of a paper published in JAMA Oncology.
  • Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.

Reuse

  • Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved.
  • The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing.
  • The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item.
  • Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

This is a repository copy of Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior
Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.
White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:
http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/108927/
Version: Supplemental Material
Article:
Munshi, NC, Avet-Loiseau, H, Rawstron, AC et al. (8 more authors) (2017) Association of
Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple
Myeloma: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncology, 3 (1). pp. 28-35. ISSN 2374-2437
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160
© 2016, American Medical Association. This is an author produced version of a paper
published in JAMA Oncology. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving
policy.
eprints@whiterose.ac.uk
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/
Reuse
Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright
exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy
solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The
publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White
Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder,
users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.
Takedown
If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by
emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.

Study
First author & year
Hazard ratio
Overall hazard ratio: 0.57
95% CI: .46–.71,
P = .0000004
0 1 2 3 4
Total
Rawstron 2002
Ferrero 2014
Bakkus 2004
Dal Bo 2013
Paiva 2011 (CR)
Paiva 2008
Korthals 2012
Korthals 2013
Swedin 1998 (CR)
Rawstron 2013
Ludwig 2015 (CR)
Fukumoto 2016
2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (years)
MRD-negative
N = 660
χ
2
1
= 134.4
P < .00001
MRD-positive
N = 613
% PFS
20
40
60
80
100
Numbers at risk:
MRD –VE: 457 214 70 12 1
MRD +VE: 308 113 28 4 1
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (years)
MRD-negative
N = 599
χ
2
1
= 25.27
P = .0000005
MRD-positive
N = 501
Cumulative % Surviving
20
40
60
80
100
Numbers at risk:
508 359 139 26 4
390 250 105 17 5
0
Hazard ratio for PFS
Hazard ratio for OS
Study
First author & year
Hazard ratio
Overall hazard ratio: 0.41
95% CI: .36–.48,
P < .0001
0 .5 1 1.5 2
Total
Rawstron 2002
San Miguel 2002
Ferrero 2014
Bakkus 2004
Dal Bo 2013
Paiva 2011
Paiva 2008
Korthals 2012
Korthals 2013
Swedin 1998 (CR)
Rawstron 2013
Roussel 2014
Fukumoto 2016
Sarasquete 2005
A B
C D
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to distinguish between metabolically active and inactive disease, this technique is now the preferred functional imaging modality to evaluate and to monitor the effect of therapy on myeloma-cell metabolism.
Abstract: The International Myeloma Working Group consensus aimed to provide recommendations for the optimal use of 18fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders, including smouldering multiple myeloma and solitary plasmacytoma. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be considered a valuable tool for the work-up of patients with both newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma because it assesses bone damage with relatively high sensitivity and specificity, and detects extramedullary sites of proliferating clonal plasma cells while providing important prognostic information. The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT is mandatory to confirm a suspected diagnosis of solitary plasmacytoma, provided that whole-body MRI is unable to be performed, and to distinguish between smouldering and active multiple myeloma, if whole-body X-ray (WBXR) is negative and whole-body MRI is unavailable. Based on the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to distinguish between metabolically active and inactive disease, this technique is now the preferred functional imaging modality to evaluate and to monitor the effect of therapy on myeloma-cell metabolism. Changes in FDG avidity can provide an earlier evaluation of response to therapy compared to MRI scans, and can predict outcomes, particularly for patients who are eligible to receive autologous stem-cell transplantation. 18F-FDG PET/CT can be coupled with sensitive bone marrow-based techniques to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) inside and outside the bone marrow, helping to identify those patients who are defined as having imaging MRD negativity.

338 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This mini-review will focus on currently available techniques and data on MRD testing and their potential future applications.
Abstract: In the last years, the life expectancy of multiple myeloma (MM) patients has substantially improved thanks to the availability of many new drugs. Our ability to induce deep responses has improved as well, and the treatment goal in patients tolerating treatment moved from the delay of progression to the induction of the deepest possible response. As a result of these advances, a great scientific effort has been made to redefine response monitoring, resulting in the development and validation of high-sensitivity techniques to detect minimal residual disease (MRD). In 2016, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated MM response categories defining MRD-negative responses both in the bone marrow (assessed by next-generation flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing) and outside the bone marrow. MRD is an important factor independently predicting prognosis during MM treatment. Moreover, using novel combination therapies, MRD-negative status can be achieved in a fairly high percentage of patients. However, many questions regarding the clinical use of MRD status remain unanswered. MRD monitoring can guide treatment intensity, although well-designed clinical trials are needed to demonstrate this potential. This mini-review will focus on currently available techniques and data on MRD testing and their potential future applications.

254 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Feb 2020-Leukemia
TL;DR: Clinical data outline the potential for BCMA-targeted therapies to improve the treatment landscape for MM and suggest that these therapies may hold promise for deep and durable responses and support further investigation in earlier lines of treatment, including newly diagnosed MM.
Abstract: Despite considerable advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to current therapies or have a short duration of response. Furthermore, these treatments can have notable morbidity and are not uniformly tolerated in all patients. As there is no cure for MM, patients eventually become resistant to therapies, leading to development of relapsed/refractory MM. Therefore, an unmet need exists for MM treatments with novel mechanisms of action that can provide durable responses, evade resistance to prior therapies, and/or are better tolerated. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is preferentially expressed by mature B lymphocytes, and its overexpression and activation are associated with MM in preclinical models and humans, supporting its potential utility as a therapeutic target for MM. Moreover, the use of BCMA as a biomarker for MM is supported by its prognostic value, correlation with clinical status, and its ability to be used in traditionally difficult-to-monitor patient populations. Here, we review three common treatment modalities used to target BCMA in the treatment of MM: bispecific antibody constructs, antibody–drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cell therapy. We provide an overview of preliminary clinical data from trials using these therapies, including the BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) immuno-oncology therapy AMG 420, the antibody–drug conjugate GSK2857916, and several CAR T-cell therapeutic agents including bb2121, NIH CAR-BCMA, and LCAR-B38M. Notable antimyeloma activity and high minimal residual disease negativity rates have been observed with several of these treatments. These clinical data outline the potential for BCMA-targeted therapies to improve the treatment landscape for MM. Importantly, clinical results to date suggest that these therapies may hold promise for deep and durable responses and support further investigation in earlier lines of treatment, including newly diagnosed MM.

220 citations


Cites background from "Association of Minimal Residual Dis..."

  • ...The use of MRD endpoints in clinical studies of hematologic malignancies has been increasing over time, and achieving MRD negativity is associated with better clinical outcomes [42, 44]....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A general parametric approach is presented, which utilizes efficient score statistics and Fisher's information, and relates this to different methods suggested by previous authors.
Abstract: Meta-analysis provides a systematic and quantitative approach to the summary of results from randomized studies. Whilst many authors have published actual meta-analyses concerning specific therapeutic questions, less has been published about comprehensive methodology. This article presents a general parametric approach, which utilizes efficient score statistics and Fisher's information, and relates this to different methods suggested by previous authors. Normally distributed, binary, ordinal and survival data are considered. Both the fixed effects and random effects model for treatments are described.

728 citations


"Association of Minimal Residual Dis..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...Hazard ratio forest plots were then generated using the inverse variance weighting method, as described in detail by Whitehead and Whitehead.(11) Cox proportional hazards Key Points...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
15 May 2014-Blood
TL;DR: The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in multiple myeloma patients using a sequencing-based platform in bone marrow samples from 133 MM patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) after front-line therapy was assessed.

370 citations

Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. 

Numbers at risk:MRD –VE: 457 214 70 12 1MRD +VE: 308 113 28 4 10 2 4 6 8 10 12Time (years)MRD-negativeN = 599χ2 1 = 25.27 P = .0000005MRD-positiveN = 501C u mu lati v e %S u rviv ing20406080100Numbers at risk:508 359 139 26 4390 250 105 17 50Hazard ratio for PFSHazard ratio for OSStudyFirst author & yearHazard ratioOverall hazard ratio: 0.4195% CI: .36–.48,P < .00010 .5 1 1.5 2TotalRawstron 2002San Miguel 2002Ferrero 2014Bakkus 2004Dal Bo 2013Paiva 2011Paiva 2008Korthals 2012Korthals 2013Swedin 1998 (CR)Rawstron 2013Roussel 2014Fukumoto 2016Sarasquete 2005A BC D