Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.
Summary (1 min read)
Article:
- Munshi, NC, Avet-Loiseau, H, Rawstron, AC et al. (8 more authors) (2017) Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.
- This is an author produced version of a paper published in JAMA Oncology.
- Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Reuse
- Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved.
- The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing.
- The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item.
- Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
338 citations
278 citations
254 citations
220 citations
Cites background from "Association of Minimal Residual Dis..."
...The use of MRD endpoints in clinical studies of hematologic malignancies has been increasing over time, and achieving MRD negativity is associated with better clinical outcomes [42, 44]....
[...]
217 citations
References
854 citations
728 citations
"Association of Minimal Residual Dis..." refers methods in this paper
...Hazard ratio forest plots were then generated using the inverse variance weighting method, as described in detail by Whitehead and Whitehead.(11) Cox proportional hazards Key Points...
[...]
430 citations
390 citations
370 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Q2. What is the risk of a mrd?
Numbers at risk:MRD –VE: 457 214 70 12 1MRD +VE: 308 113 28 4 10 2 4 6 8 10 12Time (years)MRD-negativeN = 599χ2 1 = 25.27 P = .0000005MRD-positiveN = 501C u mu lati v e %S u rviv ing20406080100Numbers at risk:508 359 139 26 4390 250 105 17 50Hazard ratio for PFSHazard ratio for OSStudyFirst author & yearHazard ratioOverall hazard ratio: 0.4195% CI: .36–.48,P < .00010 .5 1 1.5 2TotalRawstron 2002San Miguel 2002Ferrero 2014Bakkus 2004Dal Bo 2013Paiva 2011Paiva 2008Korthals 2012Korthals 2013Swedin 1998 (CR)Rawstron 2013Roussel 2014Fukumoto 2016Sarasquete 2005A BC D