Abstract: Despite the well-known importance of physical activity (PA) in the maintenance of physical, cognitive, and emotional health through the later adult years,1–3 older adults remain the least active age group in the United States.3–6 Less than a third of older adults in the United States report meeting recommended PA levels in national surveys,4 and accelerometer-measured PA levels provide an even more alarming statistic (<4%).7 Not only is inactivity a major contributor to the growing burden of non-communicable diseases in the United States and worldwide,8 but it also has major implications for the ever-increasing health care costs attributed to these diseases.9–11 With medical expenditures already being highest among older adults12 and the proportion of the United States population aged 65 and older expected to double over the next four decades,13 promoting PA among older adults is an important public health, clinical, and economic issue deserving greater attention.
In recognition of this looming problem, some health plans have begun to offer their older beneficiaries free or low-cost access to community-based PA programs. For example, some Medicare Advantage members can participate in two nationally disseminated, community-based PA programs free of charge: 1) Silver Sneakers (SS), which covers membership to conditioning classes, exercise equipment, and other amenities of local participating fitness centers; and 2) EnhanceFitness (EF), an evidence-based group exercise program designed specifically to fit the needs of older adults.14,15 Studies have shown that participation in these programs has the potential to decrease (or at least attenuate the rate of increase in) total annual health care expenditures in both the general population16,17 and in patients with diabetes.18,19 However, these reductions in health care costs, mostly attributed to fewer hospital admissions and lower in-patient care costs, are generally observed among users only after continued use for more than one year17 or with attendance of more than once a week for the EF program16,18 and more than twice a week for the SS program.17,19 Notably, past reports have found that only about 25% of eligible members are actually enrolled in either EF or SS, and even fewer utilize the programs regularly (at least once a month) or continue with the programs in subsequent years.17
No known studies have examined barriers to the utilization of these two PA programs among eligible older adults in the context of a health care setting. The aforementioned studies on EF and SS programs were based on administrative and accounting data and were not able to determine if non-participants were active in other ways (eg, not interested in the programs) nor able to assess the potential psychological, social, environmental, and organizational impediments and enablers to program participation. One study did investigate underutilization of similar kinds of PA programs and services offered to independent residents of a Maryland retirement community.20 Those participants described the ideal PA program as convenient, easily accessible (in location and cost), enjoyable, social, and run by knowledgeable staff. That study did not address whether the current programs lacked these characteristics or what the specific barriers to existing programs and services were. A review of 15 qualitative and 29 quantitative studies on barriers and motivators to general PA among older adults indicated that health concerns were the most prominent factor influencing PA engagement.21 Another review of prospective and intervention studies noted that health status was an important determinant of initiation and maintenance of PA among older adults.22 Apart from health impediments and motivators, other prominent factors associated with general PA have included fear of injury or pain, self-motivation, lack of time, enjoyment of PA, social support, neighborhood conditions, weather, expense, accessibility and convenience of classes and facilities, and characteristics related to self-efficacy, such as confidence, expectations, perceived support, and affective responses related to PA.20–23
The objective of this study was to gain further insight into barriers to and facilitators of both general PA and participation in PA programs, such as the EF and SS programs. Qualitative methods were chosen to obtain a patient-centered perspective. Moreover, we aimed to gain a better understanding of participants’ perceptions of the role of health care systems in supporting and encouraging PA. Our goal was to generate a set of recommendations for potential organizational-level changes that may promote increased PA among older adults.