scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

BCOR-CCNB3-Fusion Positive Sarcomas: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of 36 cases with Comparison to Morphologic Spectrum and Clinical Behavior of other Round Cell Sarcomas

TL;DR: In this article, the authors collected 36 molecularly confirmed BCOR-CCNB3 sarcoma (BCS) cases for a detailed histologic and immunohistochemical analysis.
Abstract: BCOR-CCNB3 sarcoma (BCS) is a recently defined genetic entity among undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, which was initially classified as and treated similarly to the Ewing sarcoma (ES) family of tumors. In contrast to ES, BCS shows consistent BCOR overexpression, and preliminary evidence suggests that these tumors share morphologic features with other tumors harboring BCOR genetic alterations, including BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD) and BCOR-MAML3. To further investigate the pathologic features, clinical behavior, and their relationship to other round cell sarcomas, we collected 36 molecularly confirmed BCSs for a detailed histologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Four of the cases were also analyzed by RNA sequencing (RNAseq). An additional case with BCOR overexpression but negative CCNB3 abnormality showed a novel KMT2D-BCOR fusion by targeted RNAseq. The patients ranged in age from 2 to 44 years old (mean and median, 15), with striking male predominance (M:F=31:5). The tumor locations were slightly more common in bone (n=20) than soft tissue (n=14), with rare visceral (kidney, n=2) involvement. Histologically, BCS showed a spectrum of round to spindle cells with variable cellularity, monomorphic nuclei and fine chromatin pattern, delicate capillary network, and varying amounts of myxoid or collagenous stroma. The morphologic features and immunoprofile showed considerable overlap with other round cell sarcomas with BCOR oncogenic upregulation, that is, BCOR-MAML3 and BCOR ITD. Follow-up available in 22 patients showed a 5-year overall survival of 72%, which was relatively similar to ES (79%, P=0.738) and significantly better than CIC-DUX4 sarcomas (43%, P=0.005) control groups. Local recurrences occurred in 6 patients and distant metastases (lung, soft tissue/bone, pancreas) in 4. Seven of 9 cases treated with an ES chemotherapy regimen with evaluable histologic response showed >60% necrosis in posttherapy resections. Unsupervised clustering by RNAseq data revealed that tumors with BCOR genetic alterations, including BCOR-CCNB3, BCOR-MAML3, and BCOR ITD, formed a tight genomic group distinct from ES and CIC-rearranged sarcomas.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The recent publication of the new WHO classification of Soft Tissue Tumours and Bone represents a major step toward improved standardization of diagnosis, stimulating pathologists, geneticists and clinicians to join efforts to translate novel pathologic findings into more effective treatments.
Abstract: Mesenchymal tumours represent one of the most challenging field of diagnostic pathology and refinement of classification schemes plays a key role in improving the quality of pathologic diagnosis and, as a consequence, of therapeutic options. The recent publication of the new WHO classification of Soft Tissue Tumours and Bone represents a major step toward improved standardization of diagnosis. Importantly, the 2020 WHO classification has been opened to expert clinicians that have further contributed to underline the key value of pathologic diagnosis as a rationale for proper treatment. Several relevant advances have been introduced. In the attempt to improve the prediction of clinical behaviour of solitary fibrous tumour, a risk assessment scheme has been implemented. NTRK-rearranged soft tissue tumours are now listed as an "emerging entity" also in consideration of the recent therapeutic developments in terms of NTRK inhibition. This decision has been source of a passionate debate regarding the definition of "tumour entity" as well as the consequences of a "pathology agnostic" approach to precision oncology. In consideration of their distinct clinicopathologic features, undifferentiated round cell sarcomas are now kept separate from Ewing sarcoma and subclassified, according to the underlying gene rearrangements, into three main subgroups (CIC, BCLR and not ETS fused sarcomas) Importantly, In order to avoid potential confusion, tumour entities such as gastrointestinal stroma tumours are addressed homogenously across the different WHO fascicles. Pathologic diagnosis represents the integration of morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics and is a key element of clinical decision making. The WHO classification is as a key instrument to promote multidisciplinarity, stimulating pathologists, geneticists and clinicians to join efforts aimed to translate novel pathologic findings into more effective treatments.

205 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The 5th Edition of the 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone provides an updated classification scheme and essential diagnostic criteria for soft tissue tumors and newly recognized entities and subtypes of existing tumor types, several reclassified tumors, and newly defined molecular and genetic data have been incorporated.
Abstract: Soft tissue tumors are a relatively rare and diagnostically challenging group of neoplasms that can have varying lines of differentiation. Accurate diagnosis is important for appropriate treatment and prognostication. In the 8 years since the publication of the 4th Edition of World Health Organization (WHO) classification of soft tissue tumors, significant advances have been made in our understanding of soft tissue tumor molecular biology and diagnostic criteria. The 5th Edition of the 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone incorporated these changes. Classification of tumors, in general, but particularly in soft tissue tumors, is increasingly based on the molecular characteristics of tumor types. Understanding tumor molecular genetics improves diagnostic accuracy for tumors that have been difficult to classify on the basis of morphology alone, or that have overlapping morphologic features. In many large hospitals in the United States and Europe, molecular tests on soft tissue tumors are a routine part of diagnosis. Therefore, surgical pathologists should be familiar with newly emerging molecular genetic techniques in clinical settings. In the near future, molecular tests, particularly in soft tissue tumor diagnosis, will become as routine during diagnosis as immunohistochemistry is currently. This new edition provides an updated classification scheme and essential diagnostic criteria for soft tissue tumors. Newly recognized entities and subtypes of existing tumor types, several reclassified tumors, and newly defined molecular and genetic data have been incorporated. Herein, we summarize the updates in the WHO 5th Edition, focusing on major changes in each category of soft tissue tumor, and the newly described tumor entities and subtypes.

153 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Ewing's Sarcoma Ewing's sarcoma, an aggressive cancer of bone and soft tissue, primarily affects children and young adults, and a t(11;22) translocation is noted in 85 to 90% of cases as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Ewing’s Sarcoma Ewing’s sarcoma, an aggressive cancer of bone and soft tissue, primarily affects children and young adults. A t(11;22) translocation is noted in 85 to 90% of cases. Management inclu...

114 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A granular diagnostic approach to Ewing sarcoma and Ewing-like sarcomas is justified by significant differences in terms of both response to chemotherapy and overall survival, and a molecular diagnostic approach based on NGS technology should be considered.
Abstract: Ewing sarcoma (ES) and Ewing-like sarcomas are highly aggressive round cell mesenchymal neoplasms, most often occurring in children and young adults. The identification of novel molecular alterations has greatly contributed to a profound reappraisal of classification, to the extent that the category of undifferentiated round cell sarcoma has significantly shrunk. In fact, in addition to Ewing sarcoma, we currently recognize three main categories: round cell sarcomas with EWSR1 gene fusion with non-ETS family members, CIC-rearranged sarcomas, and BCOR-rearranged sarcomas. Interestingly, despite significant morphologic overlap, most of these entities tend to exhibit morphologic features predictive of the underlying molecular alteration. Ewing sarcoma is the prototype of round cell sarcoma whereas in CIC sarcomas, focal pleomorphism and epithelioid morphology can predominate. BCOR sarcomas often exhibit a spindled neoplastic cell population. NFATC2 sarcoma may exhibit remarkable epithelioid features, and PATZ1 sarcomas often feature a sclerotic background. The differential diagnosis for these tumors is rather broad, and among round cell sarcomas includes alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, poorly differentiated round cell synovial sarcoma, small cell osteosarcoma, and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. A combination of morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings allows accurate classification in most cases. A granular diagnostic approach to Ewing sarcoma and Ewing-like sarcomas is justified by significant differences in terms of both response to chemotherapy and overall survival. As all these entities are in part defined by specific fusion genes, a molecular diagnostic approach based on NGS technology should be considered. In consideration of the extreme rarity of many of these tumor entities, referral to expert rare cancer centers or to rare cancer networks represents the best strategy in order to minimize diagnostic inaccuracy, and allow proper patient management.

102 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review provides a comprehensive summary of BCOR’s involvement in oncology, illustrating that various BCOR aberrations, such as the internal tandem duplications of the PCGF Ub-like fold discriminator domain and different gene fusions, represent driver elements of various sarcomas.
Abstract: BCOR is a gene that encodes for an epigenetic regulator involved in the specification of cell differentiation and body structure development and takes part in the noncanonical polycomb repressive complex 1. This review provides a comprehensive summary of BCOR's involvement in oncology, illustrating that various BCOR aberrations, such as the internal tandem duplications of the PCGF Ub-like fold discriminator domain and different gene fusions (mainly BCOR-CCNB3, BCOR-MAML3 and ZC3H7B-BCOR), represent driver elements of various sarcomas such as clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, primitive mesenchymal myxoid tumor of infancy, small round blue cell sarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma and histologically heterogeneous CNS neoplasms group with similar genomic methylation patterns known as CNS-HGNET-BCOR. Furthermore, other BCOR alterations (often loss of function mutations) recur in a large variety of mesenchymal, epithelial, neural and hematological tumors, suggesting a central role in cancer evolution.

100 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An expanding collection of sequences that are directly regulated by Hox proteins provides information on the specificity of target-gene activation, which might allow the successful prediction of novel Hox-response genes.
Abstract: With their power to shape animal morphology, few genes have captured the imagination of biologists as the evolutionarily conserved members of the Hox clusters have done. Recent research has provided new insight into how Hox proteins cause morphological diversity at the organismal and evolutionary levels. Furthermore, an expanding collection of sequences that are directly regulated by Hox proteins provides information on the specificity of target-gene activation, which might allow the successful prediction of novel Hox-response genes. Finally, the recent discovery of microRNA genes within the Hox gene clusters indicates yet another level of control by Hox genes in development and evolution.

825 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive proteomic and genomic analysis uncovered six major groups of PRC1 complexes, each containing a distinct PCGF subunit, a RING1A/B ubiquitin ligase, and a unique set of associated polypeptides.

753 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Dominik Sturm1, Dominik Sturm2, Brent A. Orr3, Umut H. Toprak2, Volker Hovestadt2, David T.W. Jones2, David Capper2, David Capper1, Martin Sill2, Ivo Buchhalter2, Paul A. Northcott2, Irina Leis1, Marina Ryzhova, Christian Koelsche1, Christian Koelsche2, Elke Pfaff2, Elke Pfaff1, Sariah Allen3, Gnanaprakash Balasubramanian2, Barbara C. Worst2, Barbara C. Worst1, Kristian W. Pajtler2, Sebastian Brabetz2, Pascal Johann2, Pascal Johann1, Felix Sahm2, Felix Sahm1, Jüri Reimand4, Jüri Reimand5, Alan Mackay6, Diana Carvalho6, Marc Remke5, Joanna J. Phillips7, Arie Perry7, Cynthia Cowdrey7, Rachid Drissi8, Maryam Fouladi8, Felice Giangaspero9, Maria Łastowska10, Wiesława Grajkowska10, Wolfram Scheurlen11, Torsten Pietsch12, Christian Hagel13, Johannes Gojo14, Daniela Lötsch14, Walter Berger14, Irene Slavc14, Christine Haberler14, Anne Jouvet15, Stefan Holm16, Silvia Hofer, Marco Prinz17, Catherine Keohane18, Iris Fried19, Christian Mawrin20, David Scheie21, Bret C. Mobley22, Matthew Schniederjan, Mariarita Santi23, Anna Maria Buccoliero11, Sonika Dahiya24, Christof M. Kramm25, André O. von Bueren25, Katja von Hoff13, Stefan Rutkowski13, Christel Herold-Mende1, Michael C. Frühwald26, Till Milde1, Till Milde2, Martin Hasselblatt27, Pieter Wesseling28, Pieter Wesseling29, Jochen Rößler30, Ulrich Schüller31, Martin Ebinger, Jens Schittenhelm32, Stephan Frank33, Rainer Grobholz, Istvan Vajtai, Volkmar Hans, Reinhard Schneppenheim13, Karel Zitterbart34, V. Peter Collins35, Eleonora Aronica36, Pascale Varlet, Stéphanie Puget37, Christelle Dufour38, Jacques Grill38, Dominique Figarella-Branger39, Marietta Wolter40, Martin U. Schuhmann32, Tarek Shalaby11, Michael A. Grotzer11, Timothy E. Van Meter41, Camelia M. Monoranu42, Jörg Felsberg40, Guido Reifenberger40, Matija Snuderl43, Lynn Ann Forrester43, Jan Koster36, Rogier Versteeg36, Richard Volckmann36, Peter van Sluis36, Stephan Wolf2, Tom Mikkelsen44, Amar Gajjar3, Kenneth Aldape45, Andrew S. Moore46, Michael D. Taylor5, Chris Jones6, Nada Jabado47, Matthias A. Karajannis43, Roland Eils, Matthias Schlesner2, Peter Lichter2, Andreas von Deimling2, Andreas von Deimling1, Stefan M. Pfister2, Stefan M. Pfister1, David W. Ellison3, Andrey Korshunov1, Andrey Korshunov2, Marcel Kool2 
25 Feb 2016-Cell
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that a significant proportion of institutionally diagnosed CNS-PNETs display molecular profiles indistinguishable from those of various other well-defined CNS tumor entities, facilitating diagnosis and appropriate therapy for patients with these tumors.

648 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The specificity of the B CL-6/BCoR interaction suggests that BCoR may have a role in BCL-6-associated lymphomas and specific class I and II histone deacetylases (HDACs) interact in vivo with B coR, suggesting that B CoR may functionally link these two classes of HDACs.
Abstract: BCL-6 encodes a POZ/zinc finger transcriptional repressor that is required for germinal center formation and may influence apoptosis. Aberrant expression of BCL-6 due to chromosomal translocations is implicated in certain subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The POZ domains of BCL-6 and several other POZ proteins interact with corepressors N-CoR and SMRT. Here we identify and characterize a novel corepressor BCoR (BCL-6 interacting corepressor), which is expressed ubiquitously in human tissues. BCoR can function as a corepressor when tethered to DNA and, when overexpressed, can potentiate BCL-6 repression. Specific class I and II histone deacetylases (HDACs) interact in vivo with BCoR, suggesting that BCoR may functionally link these two classes of HDACs. Strikingly, BCoR interacts selectively with the POZ domain of BCL-6 but not with eight other POZ proteins tested, including PLZF. Additionally, interactions between the BCL-6 POZ domain and SMRT, N-CoR, and BCoR are mutually exclusive. The specificity of the BCL-6/BCoR interaction suggests that BCoR may have a role in BCL-6-associated lymphomas.

440 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The intrachromosomal X-chromosome fusion described here represents a new subtype of bone Sarcoma caused by a newly identified gene fusion mechanism and it is shown that CCNB3 immunohistochemistry is a powerful diagnostic marker for this subgroup of sarcoma.
Abstract: The identification of subtype-specific translocations has revolutionized the diagnostics of sarcoma and has provided new insight into oncogenesis. We used RNA-seq to investigate samples from individuals diagnosed with small round cell tumors of bone, possibly Ewing sarcoma, but which lacked the canonical EWSR1-ETS translocation. A new fusion was observed between BCOR (encoding the BCL6 co-repressor) and CCNB3 (encoding the testis-specific cyclin B3) on the X chromosome. RNA-seq results were confirmed by RT-PCR and through cloning of the tumor-specific genomic translocation breakpoints. In total, 24 BCOR-CCNB3-positive tumors were identified among a series of 594 sarcoma cases. Gene profiling experiments indicated that BCOR-CCNB3-positive cases are biologically distinct from other sarcomas, particularly Ewing sarcoma. Finally, we show that CCNB3 immunohistochemistry is a powerful diagnostic marker for this subgroup of sarcoma and that overexpression of BCOR-CCNB3 or of truncated CCNB3 activates S phase in NIH3T3 cells. Thus, the intrachromosomal X-chromosome fusion described here represents a new subtype of bone sarcoma caused by a newly identified gene fusion mechanism.

386 citations

Related Papers (5)