scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

"Best for the family": researching families and business.

01 Jan 2001-Family & Community History (Routledge)-Vol. 4, Iss: 1, pp 31-44
TL;DR: A study of one firm is used to argue that the stereotype conceals significant questions about firms, families and the relations between them, and some recent historical work on family firms is outlined.
Abstract: For most of us, the term ‘family firm’ summons images of an old-established and perhaps rather conservative business that has been passed down through the generations. This article starts by using a study of one firm to argue that the stereotype conceals significant questions about firms, families and the relations between them. It goes on to outline some recent historical work on family firms by looking, in turn, at research on the incidence and character of family business, on the strategies and performance of companies, and on the family dimension in enterprise. It stresses the importance of the small-scale and the local in this research and notes that historians are now using a range of sources familiar to local and community historians to develop this field.

Summary (1 min read)

Jump to:  and [Introduction]

Introduction

  • The ‘family firm’ may be a poor measure of family business.
  • Historians are now widening the field by exploring the incidence of different types of firms, by setting performance in comparative perspective, by investigating business from the point of view of individuals and their families.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Open Research Online
The Open University’s repository of research publications
and other research outputs
’Best for the family’: researching families and business
Journal Item
How to cite:
Mackie, Robin (2001). ’Best for the family’: researching families and business. Family and Community History, 4(1)
pp. 31–44.
For guidance on citations see FAQs.
c
2001 FACHRS
Version: Accepted Manuscript
Link(s) to article on publisher’s website:
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1179/fch.2001.4.1.004
http://www.fachrs.com/pages/journal/journal_of_fachrs_archive.htm#May 2001
Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright
owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies
page.
oro.open.ac.uk

1
‘Best for the family’: researching families and business
Robin Mackie
Department of History of Science and Technology
Faculty of Arts
The Open University
Walton Hall
Milton Keynes
MK7 6AA
Tel: 01908-652544
Email: r.l.mackie@open.ac.uk
Biographical Note
Robin Mackie is a researcher at the Open University. He is at present working on a project on
the social history of chemistry in Britain. He is also interested in family and business history.
Address: Department of History of Science and Technology, The Open University, Walton
Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA. Email: r.l.mackie@open.ac.uk.

2
‘Best for the family’: researching families and business
Abstract
For most of us, the term ‘family firm’ summons images of an old-established and perhaps rather
conservative business that has been passed down through the generations. This article starts by
using a study of one firm to argue that the stereotype conceals significant questions about firms,
families and the relations between them. It goes on to outline some recent historical work on
family firms by looking, in turn, at research on the incidence and character of family business,
on the strategies and performance of companies, and on the family dimension in enterprise. It
stresses the importance of the small-scale and the local in this research and notes that historians
are now using a range of sources familiar to local and community historians to develop this
field.

3
During the winter of 1996, the discreet world of Edinburgh’s business establishment
was shaken by a very public battle for the future of the transport and business services group,
Christian Salvesen plc. The cause of the conflict was a proposal from the board to hive off the
company’s most successful subsidiary. Sir Gerald Elliott, a former chief executive and chairman
of the company and still a substantial shareholder, denounced the proposal as ‘lunacy done to
satisfy some speculative fat-cat shareholders in the City and questioned whether ‘the board is
fit to carry on’ (Scotsman 26 Nov 1996; Financial Times 26 Nov 1996). The reply from the
current chairman, Sir Alick Rankin, was equally scathing. ‘Gerald is a nice chap, but not only is
he not up to date with the way the City works, he is deeply resentful of it . . . All he’s doing is
creating a degree of uncertainty in the mind of the shareholder’ (The Times 4 Dec 1996).
For journalists, the key to the story was the structure of Christian Salvesen’s
shareholding. The company had been floated as a public company in 1985, but over 200
members of the extended Salvesen family –- including Sir Gerald -- retained more than 30% of
the shares. An offer to buy the company in the summer of 1996 had collapsed when it failed to
win the support of family shareholders (The Times 7 Aug 1996). As a result the share price had
slumped. Institutional investors were less than delighted; the November proposals to demerge
the company (and raise a special dividend) were widely seen as their ‘payback time’. Despite
attempts to reassure shareholders, the board was unable to quell Sir Gerald’s rebellion. The
showdown came at an extraordinary general meeting the following March: 31% of shareholders
–- including most of the private ones –- voted with Sir Gerald. The institutional investors,
however, backed the board. Sir Gerald’s camp might claim the result was a ‘moral victory’, but
it was well short of a real one. The Scotsman concluded: ‘this is the unromantic and realistic
world of business where value is all’ (14 Mar 1997).

4
The story attracted a considerable amount of comment, both in the Scottish and the
London press: ‘Family at War’ proclaimed The Scotsman, ‘Grandees do Battle for the Soul of
Christian Salvesen’, The Times. Most articles presented it as a clash between the old and the
new (Scotsman 4 Dec 1996; The Times 4 Dec 1996; Financial Times 18 Dec 1996). Much was
made of the contrast between Sir Gerald Elliott, 72, who had a distinguished record of public
service in Scotland and had worked for the company for 40 years, and the younger and brasher
Sir Alick Rankin, who was not a Salvesen, but, as chairman of Scottish and Newcastle
Breweries, was as much at home in the City as in Edinburgh. The clash was presented as one of
generations, of styles, and, not least, of business goals. The traditions of a historic family firm, it
was widely suggested, were being forced to give way to the demands of modern business.
‘Family firms’ were part of the old and journalists relied on the label to create an image
in the minds of their readers. What is indeed striking is that better-informed commentators were
at pains to point out complexities. Sir Gerald, after all, had been chairman at the time the
company was floated and had recruited both the current chief executive and Sir Alick himself.
By 1996, no Salvesens worked for the company; two, however, still sat on the board, which
was, apparently, united behind the demerger proposal. Nor was it clear how family shareholders
viewed Sir Geralds campaign. Some, it was rumoured, were less than happy with the
company’s rather lacklustre performance; all stood to benefit from the extra dividend. When
one family member spoke of collectively assessing whether ‘these proposals are the best for the
family’, it was by no means clear all would place the same value on preserving the company’s
unity (Scotsman 4 Dec 1996).
By coincidence, shortly before these events, work was completed on a history of the
family, the Slekten Salvesen (Salvesen 1995). ‘Slektenis a Norwegian word most easily
translated as clan, and the book traces the family back to the 1550s and the small town of
Mandal in southern Norway. Ten sides, however, cover the first nine generations with the bulk
of the book, some 320 pages, devoted to the period after 1800. A brief profile is provided of all

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors explains the transitions in industrial leadership from Britain to the United States and, most recently, to Japan in terms of the changing business investment strategies and organizational structures in these nations, and criticizes economists for failing to understand these historical changes.
Abstract: This book explains the transitions in twentieth-century industrial leadership from Britain to the United States and, most recently, to Japan, in terms of the changing business investment strategies and organizational structures in these nations. The author criticizes economists for failing to understand these historical changes. The book shows that this intellectual failure is not inherent in the discipline of economics; there are important traditions in economic thought that the mainstream of the economics profession has simply ignored.

519 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors developed a taxonomy of characteristics hypothesized to influence intergenerational transfer in family-owned businesses and integrated these dimensions with prominent turnover and socialization theories to propose a successor retention process model.

75 citations

DissertationDOI
18 Nov 2019
TL;DR: Koch et al. as discussed by the authors presented kinship collation, a social history tool that can reveal the sense of community as experienced by past individuals from the mapping of their networks with related people across landscapes, social institutions and economic activity.
Abstract: This thesis presents kinship collation a social history tool that can reveal the sense of community as experienced by past individuals from the mapping of their networks with related people across landscapes, social institutions and economic activity. The tool was developed from a doctoral project that worked from the interdisciplinary scholarly space created by modern, digitised genealogical endeavour and synergises methodological theories with processes that can repurpose the British-sphere record base of enumeration returns and population records.The thesis challenges the longstanding belief that British data does not carry information on the kinship behaviours of nineteenth-century actors; instead, it reveals that the data has been intentionally and unintentionally hidden. It has taken the development of improved accessibility, enhanced visualisation and data management technology combined with a specific theorisation of kinship to reveal the varied kinship connectivity that ran through society influenced in form by socioeconomic currents. The thesis, therefore, asserts that British orthodoxy on kinship has fallen behind the theoretical discussions on the nature of kinship as mutuality and reciprocity between actors as it manifests in European cultures. The discourse follows an anthropological argument that not all relatives, even close ones are automatically kin, aligned to a hypothesis that kinship is not limited to the private world of the domestic co-residency.The importance of kinship collation to map the lived community and identify kinship is amplified from a Scottish region; the sprawl of kinship is tracked as it was sustained across continents, over many decades and passed between generations. The networks are analysed for indicators of social forces that operated through the structures of the modern world, democracy, liberal values and capitalist structures and as individual social capital that stabilised women and men in their situations.

15 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The aim is to draw attention to disparate studies in these fields and to encourage further small-scale research that challenges the privileged position so frequently accorded to aggregate evidence accumulated by focusing on the national level, rather than the family and community level.
Abstract: For most individuals, financial survival depends upon luck, matching income to expenditure, paid work and the mobilization of resources via a series of links acquired through kinship, neighbourliness, friendship, ethnicity, religion or shared interests. This is a guide to some of the secondary sources that discuss external resources; friendly societies, building societies, life insurance, businesses and the co-operative movement and the relationship of each of these to families. The aim is draw attention to disparate studies in these fields and to encourage further small-scale research that challenges the privileged position so frequently accorded to aggregate evidence accumulated by focusing on the national level, rather than the family and community level.

1 citations


""Best for the family": researching ..." refers background in this paper

  • ...At this level, strategies are better understood in terms of family survival as recently surveyed in this journal by Dan Weinbren (1999)....

    [...]

Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

This article starts by using a study of one firm to argue that the stereotype conceals significant questions about firms, families and the relations between them. It stresses the importance of the small-scale and the local in this research and notes that historians are now using a range of sources familiar to local and community historians to develop this field. 

M. (1998) ‘"A bit of an entrepreneur”: a study of a small business in rural S. W. Scotland, 1881-1996’, CD-ROM (CDR0057) in Faulkner and Finnegan. 

M. (1984) ‘Merchant banking in the English class structure: ownership, solidarity and kinship in the City of London, 1850-1960’, British Journal of Sociology, 35, 3: 333-61.