Best Practices Research Summary
Citations
4 citations
Cites background from "Best Practices Research Summary"
...It is simply the degree to which a particular technology’s capabilities are matched with the expected learning outcomes and supported by fitting pedagogy that will determine the impact that technology has on learning and achievement (Clark, 2010)....
[...]
...As expressed by Clark (2010), integrating technology in meaningful ways involves matching instructional tools with curricular goals, desired student outcomes and instructional practice. Choosing the “right” tool for a learning task requires not only familiarity with the kinds of tools available, but also depends upon an understanding of how those tools can support the development of desired knowledge and skills. As with any tool selected for any purpose, the choice of what technology to use and how to use it must be guided by a set of beliefs-a vision-for how learning is best supported. Though technology integration is foreseen as a way of attaining meaningful learning on the part of the digital natives, there were several studies marking the disadvantages of technology integration. One of which was noted by Schmidt in Veitch (2010) who voiced a concern that people might be losing deep-reading skills, as they spend less time reading long-form literature passages. This probably has an effect on cognition and reading, although no one really knows what that does. Gasser and Palfrey (2009) identified multitasking...
[...]
...As expressed by Clark (2010), integrating technology in meaningful ways involves matching instructional tools with curricular goals, desired student outcomes and instructional practice....
[...]
...It is well-established by researches that integrating technology into the curriculum and instruction will bring about significant student achievement and therefore deepunderstanding of concepts (Clark, 2010)....
[...]
...As expressed by Clark (2010), integrating technology in meaningful ways involves matching instructional tools with curricular goals, desired student outcomes and instructional practice. Choosing the “right” tool for a learning task requires not only familiarity with the kinds of tools available, but also depends upon an understanding of how those tools can support the development of desired knowledge and skills. As with any tool selected for any purpose, the choice of what technology to use and how to use it must be guided by a set of beliefs-a vision-for how learning is best supported. Though technology integration is foreseen as a way of attaining meaningful learning on the part of the digital natives, there were several studies marking the disadvantages of technology integration. One of which was noted by Schmidt in Veitch (2010) who voiced a concern that people might be losing deep-reading skills, as they spend less time reading long-form literature passages....
[...]
Cites background from "Best Practices Research Summary"
...Integrating technology into the curriculum and instruction bring about significant student achievement, deep understanding of concepts and positive impact on student (Clark, 2010)....
[...]
References
748 citations
171 citations
91 citations
"Best Practices Research Summary" refers background in this paper
...Alternatively, students and can learn "with" computers—where technology provides a flexible tool that can be applied to a variety of goals in the learning process and can promote the development higher order thinking, creativity and research skills (Reeves, 1999; Ringstaff & Kelley, 2002)....
[...]
69 citations
Additional excerpts
...(Wiske, Sick, and Wirsig, 2001)....
[...]
41 citations