Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Citations
27 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...Habermas takes the discourse as a way of democratization and establishing of civil society (Habermas, 1996)....
[...]
27 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...Unlocking the iron cage—public administration in the deliberative democratic theory of Jürgen Habermas. Administration & Society, 36, 38–61. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage. Kilker, E. (1984). Max Weber and the possibilities for democracy....
[...]
...From both perspectives it is acknowledged that the increasing complexity of our modern society has implications for the exercise of Herrschaft and individual freedom (Habermas, 1996; Weber, 1922/1978)....
[...]
...Although the main concepts and arguments are still being developed, public-values approaches reject Weber’s ideal type of bureaucracy based on a set of assumptions drawn from the works of, inter alia, Barzelay (1992), Moore (1995), Fox and Miller (1995), and Habermas (1996)....
[...]
...Rather, it results in opportunistic or unreflective ways of reconciling value complexes without the guidance of reasonable criteria” (Habermas, 1996, p. 436)....
[...]
...Unlocking the iron cage—public administration in the deliberative democratic theory of Jürgen Habermas. Administration & Society, 36, 38–61. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector....
[...]
27 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...See Habermas 1996, Cohen and Arato 1992, Somers 2008, Alexander 2006a, Warren 2001, Elster 1998....
[...]
...Fourth, combining the second and third points gives new life to Habermas’s (2001) argument that the source of solidarity and shared norms need not be only ‘cultural’ (in the sense of a particularized sense of we-ness) but could also be the learning effect of the spread of information and increased interaction....
[...]
...This civic or communicative (Habermas 1996) mode of action is as such distinct from the pursuit of political power, profits or the reproduction of primary ties and identities that characterize social action in the state, market and community.2 At the heart of any conception of civil society is the…...
[...]
...Their leverage is, in Habermas’ famous trope, the force of the better argument. Of course, all civil society organizations need resources, which means money, but their legitimacy rests on articulating and pursuing goals that are not driven by the pursuit of economic returns. Indeed, if the civil society organizer, the journalist, the scholar or the advocate is shown to not be working for the cause or the aggrieved community they claim to speak for, but rather because they seek profit or power, they invariably lose much if not all of their credibility. At a broader level, this logic of legitimacy as rooted in the communicative/argumentative structures of the public sphere is precisely why so much effort—both in terms of building formal legal barriers and strong professional or normative codes of conduct—goes into ensuring that non-profits are indeed non-profits, that universities are dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge, and that media are not just mouthpieces of the state or corporations. It is in this sense that the sociological view breaks with the liberal view by recognizing that market power is as great a threat to civil society as state power.4 Even more so, some would argue, because as Habermas notes (2001), state power can be democratized;...
[...]
...This civic or communicative (Habermas 1996) mode of action is as such distinct from the pursuit of political power, profits or the reproduction of primary ties and identities that characterize social action in the state, market and community....
[...]
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...Particular language usage results in specific interpretational patterns for the comprehension of social issues, relations and identities (Habermas, 1999); as a consequence of the long-term repetition of certain stances or ideology, the media may have a lasting influence over the audience....
[...]
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...…of deliberation are far from conclusive (Carpini, Cook, & Jacobs, 2004), the many approaches to deliberation, for example, Barber (1984), Habermas (1996), Elster (1998), Fishkin (1997), and Chambers (2003), have all a common denominator: the relevance of communication in detriment of…...
[...]
References
4,002 citations
1,526 citations
1,338 citations
936 citations
911 citations