Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Citations
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...Where Machiavelli previously advocated a single will at the heart of a political community, communicative theorists - notably Arendt (1958, 1986) and Habermas (1977; 1984; 1990; 1996) - argue for a collective will, a form of power derived from collective engagement with a foundation of achieved…...
[...]
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...This finding is based on evidence 150 Habermas (1996) notes that there are groups in society that are less driven on account of economic reason, but are instead more interested in ideological objectives....
[...]
...273 Through the works of Habermas (1975, 1985, 1996), then, it can be said that the tough- on-crime legislation developed (to a degree) on the basis of public interest, desire, and consent as opposed to solely reflecting the interests of the Conservative Party as well as other interest groups....
[...]
...…from Issue 1 are reflected in the works of Alvi (2012); Becker (1963); Caputo and Vallée (2007); Chambliss and Seidman (1971); DeKeseredy (2011); Feeley and Simon (1992), Garland (1996, 2001), Habermas (1975, 1985, 1996, 2006); Hall et al. (2013), O’Malley (1999), and Wortley et al. (2008)....
[...]
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...There have been several ongoing discussions about the concept of deliberative democracy (Ferdinand, 2000; Fung, 2006; Habermas, 1984, 1989, 1996)....
[...]
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...Habermas (1996) suggested that neo-liberalism has led to widespread destruction of the life world....
[...]
26 citations
Cites background from "Between Facts and Norms: Contributi..."
...…that no concrete interpretation of or agreement on a constitutional norm (Geltung) is identical with universal validity (Gültigkeit), dissent can no longer be delegitimized; critics of the dominant interpretation can always make validity claims that ‘overshoot every context’ (Habermas, 1996: 21)....
[...]
...The same is true of how it will be formulated in the constitution and which political institutions and policies it will require.13 A claim to (universal) validity can only be raised and accepted from within a particular context (Habermas, 1996: 18–21)....
[...]
References
4,002 citations
1,526 citations
1,338 citations
936 citations
911 citations