Journal Article•
Binding the Electronic Book: Design Features for Bibliophiles.
01 Jan 2007-Visible Language (Sharon H. Poggenpohl. Available from: Rhode Island School of Design. 2 College Street, Providence, RI 02903. Tel: 401-454-6570; Fax: 401-454-6117; Web site: http://trex.id.iit.edu/visiblelanguage/Directory.html)-Vol. 41, Iss: 1, pp 50-69
TL;DR: An electronic book design called the Bi Sheng is proposed, which attempts to accommodate the significant features of conventional books while adding functionality derived from the electronic form of the text.
Abstract: This paper proposes a design for the electronic book based on discussions with frequent book readers. We adopted a conceptual framework for this project consisting of a spectrum of possible designs, with the conventional bound book at one difference pole, and the laptop computer at the other; the design activity then consisted of appropriately locating the new electronic book somewhere on this spectrum. Our data collection consisted of a web-based survey and two focus groups, all of which used a set of questions based on five human factors, to collect information on the opinions and practices common to graduate students in English and other frequent readers. Our purpose was to identify features considered crucial by frequent book readers. We addressed the goal of incorporating these features by developing an electronic book design called the Bi Sheng, which attempts to accommodate the significant features of conventional books while adding functionality derived from the electronic form of the text. INTRODUCTION The electronic book and electronic book reader have not yet been widely adopted by the majority of frequent book readers. This paper addresses the question of what an electronic book might look like that would appeal to this demographic. We ran a study with frequent book readers, in an attempt to gauge their reaction to existing e-books and e-readers, in order to identify what elements they consider crucial in the reading experience. We found that frequent readers would reasonably wish to retain the familiarity and benefits of regular book-reading that they have enjoyed, but would be interested in a technology that added still more benefits. In response, we propose a new design for the electronic book, the Bi Sheng,' which will combine the pleasure of book-reading with the flexibility of the e-book and e-book reader. Although he aptly concluded, in 1992, that manipulating electronic text was still more difficult than manipulating paper, Andrew Dillon also proposed that there might be better ways to organize information. However, by the time the second edition of Designing Usable Electronic Text (2004) appeared, Dillon's assessment on paper preference and usability had not really changed. He claimed that research still "suggests that paper is by far the preferred medium for reading" and that transferring texts to the "electronic medium is insufficient and often detrimental to use" (p. 4). The book is not a limiting form, he suggested; one could argue for "paper being the liberator as at least the reader always has access to the full text" (p. 117). Proposing a way to shape the electronic text for greater Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Dillon suggests the TIME framework (task, information, text and ergonomie variables) in an attempt to work with readers' tendency to impress structure on information (p. 126). For the purpose of our study, we look to a skill which is learned early and is easily transferable - text manipulation (p. 139). Manipulating paper and pages is a crucial and familiar aspect of interaction with a text; any attempt to create an electronic book for the frequent reader must, in some form, reproduce this (p. 179). Because electronic texts, especially e-books and e-book readers, have yet to provide the visual and tactile affordances provided by paper texts (e.g., the two dimensions of the electronic book give no indication of text size, content quality, age or usage (p. 125), an electronic book which provides those elements would serve as a mid-point between the useful familiarity of the paper text and the potential of the electronic. The Bi Sheng would provide what Dillon (2003) calls for: an e-book reader with a "richer sense of user experience, one that allows for aesthetics as much as efficiency" (p. 68). AVERSION HISTORY In the year 2000, D.T. Max looked back at the already cooled e-book industry, recollecting in "1994, when I first reported on the proposed electronic-book industry, I drank a lot of cappuccino with pony-tailed men who quoted Marshall McLuhan. …
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: This bibliography has been written to inform the INKE research group on physical aspects of digital scholarly reading to inform an integrated approach in the development of new research environments.
Abstract: In the development of new research environments, hardware has often been neglected. E-readers have (reasonably) successfully been developed for leisurely reading, but reading with the goal of writing demands a different approach. This bibliography has been written to inform the INKE research group on physical aspects of digital scholarly reading. It consists of two parts: a hardware section, including a description of commercial e-readers as well as an overview of academically developed digital reading devices and a software section, also including commercially available packages next to academically developed reading environments which allow for flexible manipulation of text and other modalities; as well as reflections on digital scholarly reading. Combined, the two sections inform an integrated approach in the development of new research environments.
18 citations
16 Jun 2009
TL;DR: The conceptual and theoretical foundations for work undertaken by the Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) research group are presented, which aim to contribute to the development of new digital information and knowledge environments that build on past textual practices.
Abstract: In this paper, we present the conceptual and theoretical foundations for work undertaken by the Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) research group, a large international, interdisciplinary research team studying reading and texts, both digital and printed. The INKE team is comprised of researchers and stakeholders at the forefronts of fields relating to textual studies, user experience, interface design, and information management. We aim to contribute to the development of new digital information and knowledge environments that build on past textual practices. In this piece, we discuss our research questions, methods, aims and research objectives, the rationale behind our work and its expected significance.
16 citations
01 Jan 2015
TL;DR: Diffusion of E-textbooks in K-12 Education: A Delphi Study by Sheila Cartwright.
Abstract: Diffusion of E-textbooks in K-12 Education: A Delphi Study by Sheila Cartwright MS, University of West Georgia, 2002 BS, New York University, 1975 AAS, Borough of Manhattan Community College, 1973 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Education
2 citations
Cites background from "Binding the Electronic Book: Design..."
...Ruecker and Uszkalo (2007) also stated that many of the issues related to design features that were presented in this study regarding highlighting, navigation, layout, bookmarking, title page, table of contents, two-page layouts, and search ability have been addressed in current generations of…...
[...]
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: E-Books: Ten Questions asks readers to consider whether they would like to be a teacher or a student, and some suggest that the former is more beneficial than the latter.
Abstract: Title: E-Books: Ten Questions Authors: Rao, Y S
1 citations
References
More filters
01 Dec 2001-Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Information Et De Bibliotheconomie
TL;DR: The present paper reviews the general usability framework that has dominated discussion in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI) and finds it wanting and an alternative view of the important determinants of user experience of interactive devices is presented.
Abstract: The present paper reviews the general usability framework that has dominated discussion in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI) and finds it wanting. An alternative view of the important determinants of user experience of interactive devices is presented with examples. Systematizing Interaction Evaluation Evaluations of information technology for human use may take many forms, from consumer reactions to screens (on a small scale) to studies of widespread adoption of technology (on a large scale). The classic human-computer interaction (HCI) approach to evaluation has focused on usability and this term is become routinely used to describe a quality of information technology that must be taken seriously in design. Most new applications are tested for usability at some stage in their design and it is common for usability to be trumpeted in marketing campaigns and advertising as a distinguishing index of product quality. While such prominence represents a victory for the usercentered design movement, it is clear that usability alone, at least as it is currently conceived, is insufficient for ensuring high quality user experiences with a new technology. Usability defined Historically, usability (of an application) has moved from a concern with features of an interface to address aspects of the interaction expressed in terms of human action. While multiple definitions still exist, the nearest to an agreed standard is the ISO 9241-derived definition of usability as the effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction with which specified users can achieve specified goals in particular environments.
167 citations
19 May 2003
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the life cycle burdens and impacts of a college student reading 40 scholarly textbooks and the equivalent amount of digitized information (53.6-MB) using a dedicated e-book reading device.
Abstract: This paper presents the findings of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) of two different book options-electronic and print. This study compared the life-cycle burdens and impacts of a college student reading 40 scholarly textbooks and the equivalent amount of digitized information (53.6-MB) using a dedicated e-book reading device. Total primary energy, material and water requirements, air and water pollutant emissions, and solid wastes for each system were evaluated. By comparing these two book options, this study provides industry, consumers, and policy makers with valuable information necessary to make environmentally informed decisions regarding e-book technologies.
56 citations
TL;DR: The first quarter of 2004 saw the largest number of e-book purchases ever with more than$3 million in sales as discussed by the authors. But, the number of books purchased in this period was limited.
Abstract: Some considered 2000 the year of the e-book, and due tothe dot-com bust, that could have been the format’s highwater mark. However, the first quarter of 2004 saw thegreatest number of e-book purchases ever with more than$3 million in sales. A 2002 consumer survey found that67 percent of respondents wanted to read e-books; 62 percent wanted access to e-books through a library.Unfortunately, the large amount of information writtenon e-books has begun to develop myths around their use,functionality, and cost. The author suggests that thesemyths may interfere with the role of libraries in helpingto determine the future of the medium and access to it.Rather than fixate on the pros and cons of current versions of e-book technology, it is important for librarians tostay engaged and help clarify the role of digital documents in the modern library.
27 citations
TL;DR: This article explored the changing social function of commodities in the United States by exploring the conditions of possibility of electronic books, or "ebooks", by juxtaposing the history of priors.
Abstract: This article explores the changing social function of commodities in the United States by exploring the conditions of possibility of electronic books, or “ebooks.” By juxtaposing the history of pri...
11 citations
25 Jul 2004
TL;DR: This work proposes adapting information retrieval techniques for the purpose of discovering these structures of large complex books, and sketches three distinctive visualizations for presenting these structures to the e-Book reader.
Abstract: Current e-Book browsers provide minimal support for comprehending the organization, narrative structure, and themes, of large complex books. In order to build an understanding of such books, readers should be provided with user interfaces that present, and relate, the organizational, narrative and thematic structures. We propose adapting information retrieval techniques for the purpose of discovering these structures, and sketch three distinctive visualizations for presenting these structures to the e-Book reader. These visualizations are presented within an initial design for an e-Book browser.
10 citations