scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Building a middle-range theory of Transformative Social Innovation; theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses

23 Dec 2017-Vol. 2, Iss: 1, pp 59-77
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that there is a need for new theory on transformative social innovation that is able to provide empowering insights to practice, especially in terms of how social innovation interacts with transformative change processes.
Abstract: This paper argues that there is currently a need for new theory on transformative social innovation that is able to provide empowering insights to practice, especially in terms of how social innovation interacts with transformative change processes. It identifies three ‘pitfalls’ that such theory-building needs to confront, and presents middle-range theory development, together with a focus on social relations and the processes of social innovation, as three elements of a theory-building strategy that responds to these pitfalls. In describing the implementation of this strategy in successive iterations between empirical case study research and integrative analysis, critical reflections are drawn on each of the three elements of the theory-building strategy. Taken together, these reflections underline the importance of maintaining a reflexive approach in developing new knowledge and theory on new social innovation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.5

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conceptualize social innovation as changing social relations, involving new ways of doing, knowing, framing and organizing, and theorize transformative social innovation (TSI) as the process of SI challenging, altering, or replacing dominant institutions in a specific social-material context.

96 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Sep 2019-Futures
TL;DR: In this paper, a tripartite framework is used to analyse and discuss the content, construction and role of the NoC of four initiatives: Ashoka, the Global Ecovillage Network, RIPESS and Shareable.

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the mechanisms of empowerment from a social psychology perspective are conceptualized from both a public and academic discussion on empowerment and social innovation by conceptualizing the mechanisms and mechanisms of social innovation.
Abstract: This paper contributes to public and academic discussions on empowerment and social innovation by conceptualizing the mechanisms of empowerment from a social psychology perspective, and emp...

75 citations


Cites background or methods from "Building a middle-range theory of T..."

  • ...…paper builds on self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) and intrinsic motivation research (Thomas & Velthouse, 1990) to elaborate six dimensions of psychological empowerment: (1) relatedness, (2) autonomy, (3) competence, (4) impact, (5) meaning, and (6) resilience (Haxeltine et al., 2017)....

    [...]

  • ...Data analysis was on the one hand done deductively, using the sensitizing concepts as code, and on the other hand inductively to allow for additional insights to emerge (Haxeltine et al., 2017)....

    [...]

  • ...CONTACT Flor Avelino avelino@drift.eur.nl DRIFT/Transition Academy, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Haxeltine et al., 2017)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review essay proposes a broadened social innovation understanding to open up the normative complexity of the concept and understand it as an analytical entry point for socio-material intertwinement.
Abstract: Social innovation is an important dimension of current transformations in energy systems. It can refer to alternative business models, novel policy instruments, financing schemes, participatory governance approaches to energy questions, or new discourses. Its significance for energy systems is often considered in narrow instrumentalist terms, reducing it to a tool serving particular policy objectives. Grounding the concept in social science and humanities insights, this review essay proposes a broadened social innovation understanding. We propose 1) to open up the normative complexity of the concept; 2) to appreciate the multi-actor nature of social innovation; 3) to understand it as an analytical entry point for socio-material intertwinement; and, 4) to understand social innovation as premised on experimentalism-based intervention logics. The proposed social innovation understandings provide a broader imagination and strategizing of structural changes in energy systems.

51 citations


Cites background from "Building a middle-range theory of T..."

  • ...Such a relational understanding of social innovation acknowledges its distributed, co-produced diffusion [57] while not neglecting the particular agency of those actors shaping a certain social innovation [120]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, social innovation is on the rise as a mode of governance through which to address societal challenges, seeking to empower SI initiatives, researchers and policy makers are concerned with the develo...
Abstract: Social innovation is on the rise as a mode of governance through which to address societal challenges. Seeking to empower SI initiatives, researchers and policy makers are concerned with the develo...

51 citations


Cites background or methods from "Building a middle-range theory of T..."

  • ...Deliberately grounding the SI analysis in Social Science and Humanities insights (Moulaert et al. 2017) and seeking to remain attentive to the complexity of distributed SI agency (Pel et al. 2017), the typology rather informs reflexive practice (Haxeltine et al. 2017b)....

    [...]

  • ...Within the context of a four-year research project on transformative social innovation (Haxeltine et al. 2017b; TRANSIT 2018), we have analysed and compared 20 transnational networks of social innovation initiatives....

    [...]

  • ...This includes the communication infrastructures through which SI concepts are mediated and spread (Cf. Haxeltine et al. 2017a; Pel and Backhaus 2018)....

    [...]

  • ...Involving new ways of doing, organizing, framing and knowing (Avelino et al. 2019), it refers to a wide range of developments such as Ecovillages, Time Banks, sharing schemes, science shops and makerspaces (Haxeltine et al. 2017a)....

    [...]

  • ...Informed by various relational and network-oriented theoretical perspectives in sociology, innovation theory, and governance scholarship, amongst others (Pel et al. 2017; Haxeltine et al. 2017a), “SI ecosystems” are differentiated along the empowerment processes that constitute them....

    [...]

Trending Questions (1)
How hard is it to change your social?

This paper argues that there is currently a need for new theory on transformative social innovation that is able to provide empowering insights to practice, especially in terms of how social innovation interacts with transformative change processes.