Bundle Gerbes for Chern-Simons and Wess-Zumino-Witten Theories
Summary (2 min read)
1. Introduction
- Quillen introduced the determinant line bundle of Cauchy-Riemann operators on a Hermitian vector bundle coupled to unitary connections over a Riemann surface.
- Briefly speaking, a degree p Deligne characteristic class for principal G-bundles with connection is an assignment to any principal G-bundle with connection over M of a class in the degree p Deligne cohomology group Hp(M,Dp) satisfying a certain functorial property.
- The authors will define three dimensional Chern-Simons gauge theories CS(G) as degree 3 Deligne cohomology valued characteristic classes for principal G-bundles with connection, but will later show that there is a global differential geometric structure, the Chern-Simons bundle 2-gerbe, associated to each Chern-Simons gauge theory.
- Next in the hierarchy, H2(M,D2) is the space of stable isomorphism classes of bundle gerbes with connection and curving, whose holonomy is defined for any 2-dimensional closed sub-manifold and whose characteristic class in H3(M,Z) is given by the Dixmier-Douady class of the underlying bundle gerbe.
- With the understanding of (2.3), the authors often identify a Deligne class with the corresponding Cheeger-Simons differential character.
3. From Chern-Simons to Wess-Zumino-Witten
- Dijkgraaf and Witten discuss a correspondence map between three dimensional Chern-Simons gauge theories and Wess-Zumino-Witten models associated to the compact Lie group G from the topological actions viewpoint, which naturally involves the transgression map τ : H4(BG,Z) → H3(G,Z).
- To classify the exponentiated Chern-Simons action in three dimensional ChernSimons gauge theories, the authors propose the following mathematical definitions of a three dimensional Chern-Simons gauge theory and a Wess-Zumino-Witten model.
- The next proposition shows that the map Ψ descends to the natural transgression map from H4(BG,Z) to H3(G,Z) and hence Ψ refines the Dijkgraaf-Witten correspondence.
- First it is now well understood how, given a WZW model, the authors can define an associated bundle gerbe over the group G, as WZW (G) = H2(G,D2) is the space of stable isomorphism classes of bundle gerbes with connection and curving [12, 38].
4. Bundle 2-gerbes
- A bundle 2-gerbe with connection and curving, defines a degree 3 Deligne class in H3(M,D3).
- For an exception, the authors denote by EG [] the associated simplicial manifold {EG[n]} for the universal bundle π : EG→ BG,.
- Changing to the trivialisation representing the bundle gerbe product for Q, the authors find that the extra terms involving δ(J) all cancel (in the sense of having canonical trivialisations), hence the associator line bundles for P and Q are the same, so the bundle 2-gerbe product for Q is well defined.
- Analogous to the fact that H2(M,D2) classifies stable equivalence classes of bundle gerbes with connection and curving, the authors have the following proposition, whose complete proof can be found in [34].
5. Multiplicative bundle gerbes
- The simplicial manifold BG associated to the classifying space of G is constructed in [19], where the total space of the universal G-bundle EG also has a simplicial manifold structure.
- Xn which are compatible with the face and degeneracy operators for X. Brylinski and McLaughlin in [10] explain how one may inductively construct such a family of coverings by first starting with an arbitrary cover U0 of X0 and then choosing a common refinement U1 of the induced covers d−10 (U 0) and d−11 (U 0) of X1.
- As an immediate consequence of Proposition 5.3, the authors see that isomorphism classes of simplicial bundle gerbes on BG are classified by the simplicial Čech cohomology group H3(BG, U(1)).
6. The Chern-Simons bundle 2-gerbe
- The authors will construct a Chern-Simons bundle 2-gerbe over BG such that the proof of the main theorem (Theorem 5.9) follows.
- Alternatively, the authors could choose a smooth finite dimensional n-connected approximation Moreover the bundle gerbe G over G is equipped with a connection and curving with the bundle gerbe curvature given by ωφ.
- The theorem of Cheeger and Simons given above defines a unique differential character satisfying certain conditions, thus it uniquely defines a class in Deligne cohomology and an equivalence class of bundle 2-gerbes with connection and curving, so the authors must show that the corresponding Deligne class associated to the Chern-Simons bundle 2-gerbe satisfies the required conditions.
7. Multiplicative Wess-Zumino-Witten models
- The authors study the Wess-Zumino-Witten models in the image of the correspondence from CS(G) to WZW (G).
- Recall their correspondence map in Definition 3.3 and their integration map (2.4).
- The authors constructed Ψ from a canonical G-bundle over S1 ×G in Definition 3.3 such that the bundle gerbe holonomy for the multiplicative bundle gerbe G with connection and curving over G, being in the image of Ψ, corresponds to the bundle 2-gerbe holonomy for the Chern-Simons bundle 2-gerbe Q over S1 ×G as follows.
- In particular, for non-simply connected compact semi-simple Lie group G, the authors know that the Wess-Zumino-Witten model on G is only multiplicative at certain levels.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
285 citations
Cites background from "Bundle Gerbes for Chern-Simons and ..."
...Another possibility is that the concept of Lie 2-group needs to be broadened to handle this case—perhaps along lines suggested by Brylinksi’s paper on multiplicative gerbes [16, 17 ]....
[...]
139 citations
136 citations
133 citations
102 citations
References
2,298 citations
1,103 citations
1,018 citations
"Bundle Gerbes for Chern-Simons and ..." refers background in this paper
...Recall that the Cheeger-Simons group of differential characters of degree p in [16], Ȟ(M,U(1)), is defined to be the space of pairs, (χ, ω) consisting of a homomorphism χ : Zp(M,Z) → U(1) where Zp(M,Z) is the group of smooth p-cycles, and an imaginary-valued closed (p+1)-form ω on M with periods in 2πiZ such that for any smooth (p+1) chain σ...
[...]
...Recall [16] that associated with each principal G-bundle P with connection A Cheeger and Simons constructed a differential character SΦ,φ(P,A) ∈ Ȟ (3)(M,U(1)), where Φ ∈ I(2)(G) is a G-invariant polynomial on its Lie algebra and φ ∈ H(4)(BG,Z) is a characteristic class corresponding to Φ under the Chern-Weil homomorphism....
[...]
...In [16] Cheeger and Simons show that each (Φ, φ) ∈ A(G,Z) defines a differential character valued characteristic class of degree 2k−1, whose value on a principal G-bundle P over M with connection A is denoted by SΦ,φ(P,A) ∈ Ȟ (M,U(1)) (Cf....
[...]
978 citations
"Bundle Gerbes for Chern-Simons and ..." refers background in this paper
...Gerbes first began to enter the picture with J-L Brylinski [6] and Breen [5]....
[...]
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What is the choice of a finite dimensional principal G-bundle?
Given a principal G-bundle P with a connection A over M and an integer n > max{5, dimM}, there is a choice of nconnected finite dimensional principal G-bundle En with a connection
Q3. What is the corresponding left-invariant closed 3-form on BG?
The corresponding left-invariant closed 3-form ωφ on G is an integer multiple of the standard 3-form < θ, [θ, θ] > where θ is the left-invariant MaurerCartan form on G and < , > is the symmetric bilinear form on the Lie algebra of G defined by Φ ∈ I2(G).
Q4. What is the holonomy of the bundle gerbe G over 0?
The authors can construct a flat G-bundle over Σ0,3 ×Σ with boundary orientation given in such a way that the usual holonomies for flat G-bundle are σ1, σ2 and σ1 · σ2 respectively.
Q5. What is the proof of the definition of a Deligne characteristic class?
Note that the characteristic classes only depend on the underlying topological principal G-bundle, in order to define a Deligne cohomology valued characteristic class, the authors will restrict ourselves to differentiable principal G-bundles.
Q6. What is the space of 2-morphisms between two stable isomorphisms?
Note that the space of 2-morphisms between two stable isomorphisms is one-to-one corresponding to the space of line bundles over M .Consider the face operators πi : X [n] → X [n−1] on the simplicial manifold X• ={Xn = X [n+1]}.
Q7. What is the holonomy of the so-called B field?
It implies that for the transgressive Wess-Zumino-Witten models, the so-called B field satisfies a certain integrality condition.
Q8. What is the definition of a three dimensional Chern-Simons gauge theory?
The authors make the following definitions:(1) A three dimensional Chern-Simons gauge theory with gauge group G is defined to be a Deligne characteristic class of degree 3 for a principal Gbundle with connection.
Q9. what is the proof of a class of principal G-bundles?
The proof is: given a characteristic class c, the authors have, of course, c(EG) ∈ H∗(BG,Z) and conversely if ξ ∈ H∗(BG,Z) is given, then defining cξ(P ) = f∗(ξ) for any classifying map f : M → BG gives rise to a characteristic class for the isomorphism class of principal G-bundles defined by the classifying map f .
Q10. What is the definition of a bundle gerbe on a simplicial manifold?
The authors begin with the definition of a simplicial bundle gerbe as in [44] on a simplicial manifold X• = {Xn}n≥0 with face operators di : Xn+1 → Xn (i = 0, 1, · · · , n+ 1).
Q11. What is the equivalence class of a bundle 2-gerbe with connection and?
Recall that for a connection on a line bundle over M , a gauge transformation is given by a smooth function M → U(1), and an extended gauge transformation for a bundle gerbe with connection and curving is given by a line bundle with connection over M .
Q12. What is the relevance of the Chern-Simons gauge theory?
The relevance of Chern-Simons gauge theory has been noted by many authors, starting with Ramadas-Singer-Weitsman [43] and recently Dupont-Johansen [20], who used gauge covariance of the Chern-Simons functional to give a geometric2000 Mathematics Subject Classification.
Q13. What is the commutative diagram of a homotopy class?
This commutative diagram gives rise to a homotopy class of maps ψ̂ : G→ K(Z, 3) which determines a classcψ ∈ H 3(G,Z) ∼= [G,K(Z, 3)].
Q14. What is the role of Deligne cohomology in topological field theories?
The role of Deligne cohomology as an ingredient in topological field theories goes back to [27] and the authors add a new feature in section 2 by using Deligne cohomologyvalued characteristic classes for principal G-bundles with connection.