scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry

12 Apr 2005-
TL;DR: Travis as mentioned in this paper proposes organizing the criminal justice system around five principles of reentry to encourage change and spur innovation, and argues that the impact of returning prisoners on families and communities has been largely overlooked.
Abstract: As our justice system has embarked upon one of our time's greatest social experiments?responding to crime by expanding prisons?we have forgotten the iron law of imprisonment: they all come back. In 2002, more than 630,000 individuals left federal and state prisons. Thirty years ago, only 150,000 did. In the intense political debate over America's punishment policies, the impact of these returning prisoners on families and communities has been largely overlooked. In But They All Come Back, Jeremy Travis continues his pioneering work on the new realities of punishment in America vis-a-vis public safety, families and children, work, housing, public health, civic identity, and community capacity. Travis proposes organizing the criminal justice system around five principles of reentry to encourage change and spur innovation.
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2016
TL;DR: This paper found that young males, poor, uneducated, and unemployed had a greater tendency to commit crimes and be convicted of them and the propensity to commit crime was strongest between the ages of 21 and 25.
Abstract: Chapter 6 described the work of Quetelet to establish the regularities of crime in the early nineteenth century. Studying the incidence of criminal acts before the courts from 1826 to 1829, he found that young males, poor, uneducated, and unemployed had a greater tendency to commit crimes and be convicted of them. The propensity to commit crimes, he found, was strongest between the ages of 21 and 25.

9 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Initial empirical evidence is provided for the importance of leisure in offender rehabilitation and successful offender reentry and the role of leisure education programming as a supportive offender rehabilitation strategy.
Abstract: This study examined the statistical relationship between offender rehabilitation and leisure functioning of Oregon prisoners ( N = 281) soon to reenter society. The strong positive correlation between leisure functioning and rehabilitation is an important finding of the study. Perception of freedom and intrinsic motivation in leisure, as independent variables, were significantly related to rehabilitation even when controlling for the influence of demographic and important forensic variables. This study provides initial empirical evidence for the importance of leisure in offender rehabilitation and successful offender reentry. The role of leisure education programming as a supportive offender rehabilitation strategy is also discussed.

9 citations


Cites background from "But They All Come Back: Facing the ..."

  • ...According to Travis (2005),...

    [...]

  • ...Between two thirds and three quarters of all prisoners struggle with substance-abuse problems (American Public Health Association, 2010; Petersilia, 2003; Reentry Policy Council, 2006; Travis, 2005), and just more than half (i....

    [...]

  • ...Between two thirds and three quarters of all prisoners struggle with substance-abuse problems (American Public Health Association, 2010; Petersilia, 2003; Reentry Policy Council, 2006; Travis, 2005), and just more than half (i.e., 55...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe how several "shadow carceral innovations" in the school and community mark some young people as "dangerous", "high risk", or "unsafe" and show how these experiences are measured and judged across a variety of institutions.
Abstract: The rate of detention for juveniles in the United States (US) is half what it was 20 years ago, and arrest rates have declined as well. Scholars, however, have illuminated more subtle processes of criminalization, such as through school disciplinary practices and civil penalties for low-level infractions in the community. Recognizing the presence and importance of such “shadow measures” helps us to understand how the carceral state penetrates deeper into the lives of (young) people, even in the midst of emerging reforms that would seem to dull the sharpest edges of the US criminal justice system. In this article, we delineate some of the ways that “shadow measures” help to sustain and legitimate deep economic, social, and justice system inequalities in the present-day US. Specifically, we describe how several “shadow carceral innovations” in the school and community mark some young people as “dangerous,” “high-risk,” or “unsafe,” and show how these experiences are measured and judged across a variety of institutions. Ultimately, we argue that these “shadow measures” structure the day-to-day lives of youth outside the workforce and the cellblock, functioning as a key mechanism for maintaining inequality in the second decade of this century.

9 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a pre-release behavioral health services appear to improve treatment access for substance use disorder (SUD) patients after prison, however, a dearth of evidence suggests that these services may be ineffective.
Abstract: Accessing substance use disorder (SUD) treatment after prison is a challenging process for released inmates. Pre-release behavioral health services appear to improve treatment access. However, a de...

9 citations


Cites background from "But They All Come Back: Facing the ..."

  • ...…are likely to experience a combination of social and personal issues such as financial difficulties, employment, education and housing access, family and relationship issues, health concerns (both mental and physical), and stigma due to their ex-offender status (Petersilia, 2003; Travis, 2005)....

    [...]

  • ...…manifest in legislation or regulations that exclude former prisoners from key resources such as certain welfare assistance programs, Section 8 housing, some careers (due to licensing rules around criminal records), and access to educational grants for low-income individuals (Travis, 2005)....

    [...]

  • ...Travis (2005) argues that prisoners face “invisible punishments” after reentry....

    [...]

  • ...The difficulties inherent in reentry can be mitigated by how criminal justice agencies handle this transition phase for people with SUDs (Petersilia, 2003; Prendergast, 2009; Taxman et al., 2003; Travis, 2005)....

    [...]