Caltech faint galaxy redshift survey. VIII. Analysis of the field J0053+1234
Summary (1 min read)
Introduction
- You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it.
- This study indicates that self-evaluation personality characteristics play a key role in predicting HIW, and are more important than traditionally investigated factors associated with the home and workplace environments.
- The second aim of this study is to compare the impact on work-home interference of dispositional variables with that of situational variables, and ascertain which explains a greater amount of variance in interference.
Perfectionism
- Perfectionism has been defined as “an extreme or excessive striving for perfection, as in one’s work” (Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, 1988, p. 873).
- Adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism do not appear to be opposite poles on a single continuum, but separate and largely independent factors (Slaney et al., 2001; Stumpf & Parker, 2000).
- Self-efficacy beliefs influence which stimuli people choose to pay attention to, whether people appraise the situations in which they find themselves as positive or negative, and whether they remember past situations as having been positive, neutral, or negative (Bandura, 1997).
- As role stressors occur in the organizational and home environment, it is reasonable to assume on the basis of the plasticity hypothesis that individuals with low self-esteem would be more affected by these stressors than those with high self-esteem.
- Employees who perceive their organization’s culture to be supportive of them have reported lower levels of generalized work-home interference (Allen, 2001), WIH (Kirchmeyer & Cohen, 1999; Thompson et al., 1999), and HIW (Friedman & Greenhaus, 2000).
Sample
- Participants were drawn from two organizations in England: a local government council and a higher-education institution.
- Two hundred and thirty-one surveys were returned, yielding a response rate of 29%.
- Eight surveys were excluded from the final analyses due to missing responses, generating an effective sample size of 223.
- Participant ages ranged from 17 to 68, with an average age of just over 41 years.
- The average number of adult dependents for these respondents was 1.33.
Measures
- Work-home interference was measured with the 18 items from Carlson, Kacmar, & Williams’ (2000) multidimensional measure of work-family conflict.
- The dispositional variables under investigation in this study accounted for significantly more variance beyond the situational variables in HIW ( R2 = .15, p < .001).
- The general tendency of maladaptive perfectionists to critically evaluate their performance (Frost et al., 1990) renders them prone to making negative evaluations of their efforts to achieve low levels of work-home interference.
- The second aim of this study was to explore whether the dispositional or the situational characteristics under investigation were responsible for explaining the greatest amount of variance in work-home interference.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
2,117 citations
686 citations
398 citations
377 citations
334 citations
References
3,553 citations
3,368 citations
2,237 citations
1,867 citations
1,738 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What is the standard method for age-dating a (fairly young) galaxy?
The standard method for age-dating a (fairly) young galaxy involves assuming that the near-ultraviolet spectral energy distribution is not severely a†ected by extinction (see ° 3.4) and is dominated by stars near the main-sequence turno† of the most recent signiÐcant burst of star formation.
Q3. How many spectral bands are introduced in the vacuum ultraviolet?
The authors also introduce two new spectral bands, P and Q, at rest frequencies log l\\ 15, 15.1 in the vacuum ultraviolet, which are directly observed in most cases.
Q4. How many galaxies have redshifts in the no-evolution model?
The authors Ðnd that, in the no-evolution model, 43 galaxies are predicted to have 0.8\\ z\\ 1.3 and 69 galaxies are expected in the same range under the passive-evolution model, whereas, excluding two AGNs, only 24 galaxies have redshifts in this interval.
Q5. What did Lin et al. (1996b) analyze?
Lin et al. (1996b) analyzed the Las Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS; Shectman et al. 1996) to show that the nonÈemission-line galaxies show more clustering power over a wide range of scales than do the emission-line galaxies.
Q6. What is the alternative to the near-ultraviolet age dating technique?
An alternative to the near-ultraviolet age dating technique is to perform a more sophisticated population synthesis based on the entire observed spectral energy distribution of each galaxy.
Q7. What is the power-law index for a starburst?
Since their deÐnition of is the power-law index between rest frameaUVB and Q (2380 and there may be substantial contribu-A ), tions from older stars at B, the authors use the power-law indexdeÐned from their rest frame SEDs between U and Q instead.
Q8. How many bright galaxies have been assigned a spectral type of C rather?
Roughly 30% of the brightest galaxies in the peaks have been assigned a spectral type of C rather than of A, and the spectral class of the brightest galaxy itself switches from A to C (see Table 2) in the higher redshift peaks.
Q9. What is the probability of producing multiple redshift peaks using clusters of galaxies?
The projected surface density of galaxies in the redshift peaks is much smaller than that in the cores of typical rich clusters, although it is probably not very di†erent when compared to the peripheral regions.
Q10. How do the authors determine the extinction of strong emission-line galaxies?
After using their SEDs to deduce the ultraviolet extinction for strong emission-line galaxies with zD 1.2 in ° 3.4, the authors then discuss the overall distribution of galaxies in redshift and comoving volume.
Q11. How is the z 0.8 shape of the 4000 break visible?
While faint absorptionline galaxies in this regime are more problematic, the characteristic shape of the 4000 break is still visible for suchA galaxies with z\\ 0.8, at least to RD 24 mag, corresponding to (R[K) [ 4 mag at the survey limit.
Q12. How does the global luminosity function compare to the Schechter form?
In addition to discovering these correlations, the authors conÐrm that the global luminosity function out to zD 0.8, at least, exhibits no more than mild luminosity evolution and only modest density evolution and is consistent with the Schechter form.