scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer statistics, 2017

01 Jan 2017-CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (American Cancer Society)-Vol. 67, Iss: 1, pp 7-30
TL;DR: The American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2017, 1,688,780 new cancer cases and 600,920 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. For all sites combined, the cancer incidence rate is 20% higher in men than in women, while the cancer death rate is 40% higher. However, sex disparities vary by cancer type. For example, thyroid cancer incidence rates are 3-fold higher in women than in men (21 vs 7 per 100,000 population), despite equivalent death rates (0.5 per 100,000 population), largely reflecting sex differences in the "epidemic of diagnosis." Over the past decade of available data, the overall cancer incidence rate (2004-2013) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% annually in men, while the cancer death rate (2005-2014) declined by about 1.5% annually in both men and women. From 1991 to 2014, the overall cancer death rate dropped 25%, translating to approximately 2,143,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the cancer death rate was 15% higher in blacks than in whites in 2014, increasing access to care as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may expedite the narrowing racial gap; from 2010 to 2015, the proportion of blacks who were uninsured halved, from 21% to 11%, as it did for Hispanics (31% to 16%). Gains in coverage for traditionally underserved Americans will facilitate the broader application of existing cancer control knowledge across every segment of the population. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall CRC incidence in individuals ages ≥50 years declined from 2009 to 2013 in every state except Arkansas, with the decrease exceeding 5% annually in 7 states; however, rectal tumor incidence in those ages 50 to 64 years was stable in most states.
Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the United States. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society provides an update of CRC incidence, survival, and mortality rates and trends. Incidence data through 2013 were provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, the National Program of Cancer Registries, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data through 2014 were provided by the National Center for Health Statistics. CRC incidence rates are highest in Alaska Natives and blacks and lowest in Asian/Pacific Islanders, and they are 30% to 40% higher in men than in women. Recent temporal patterns are generally similar by race and sex, but differ by age. Between 2000 and 2013, incidence rates in adults aged ≥50 years declined by 32%, with the drop largest for distal tumors in people aged ≥65 years (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.48-0.52) and smallest for rectal tumors in ages 50 to 64 years (male IRR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96; female IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08). Overall CRC incidence in individuals ages ≥50 years declined from 2009 to 2013 in every state except Arkansas, with the decrease exceeding 5% annually in 7 states; however, rectal tumor incidence in those ages 50 to 64 years was stable in most states. Among adults aged <50 years, CRC incidence rates increased by 22% from 2000 to 2013, driven solely by tumors in the distal colon (IRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.13-1.35) and rectum (IRR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31). Similar to incidence patterns, CRC death rates decreased by 34% among individuals aged ≥50 years during 2000 through 2014, but increased by 13% in those aged <50 years. Progress against CRC can be accelerated by increasing initiation of screening at age 50 years (average risk) or earlier (eg, family history of CRC/advanced adenomas) and eliminating disparities in high-quality treatment. In addition, research is needed to elucidate causes for increasing CRC in young adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:177-193. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

3,220 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
23 Feb 2018-Science
TL;DR: A blood test that combines protein and DNA markers may allow earlier detection of eight common cancer types through assessment of the levels of circulating proteins and mutations in cell-free DNA.
Abstract: Earlier detection is key to reducing cancer deaths. Here, we describe a blood test that can detect eight common cancer types through assessment of the levels of circulating proteins and mutations in cell-free DNA. We applied this test, called CancerSEEK, to 1005 patients with nonmetastatic, clinically detected cancers of the ovary, liver, stomach, pancreas, esophagus, colorectum, lung, or breast. CancerSEEK tests were positive in a median of 70% of the eight cancer types. The sensitivities ranged from 69 to 98% for the detection of five cancer types (ovary, liver, stomach, pancreas, and esophagus) for which there are no screening tests available for average-risk individuals. The specificity of CancerSEEK was greater than 99%: only 7 of 812 healthy controls scored positive. In addition, CancerSEEK localized the cancer to a small number of anatomic sites in a median of 83% of the patients.

1,719 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A. Gordon Robertson1, Jaegil Kim2, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie3, Joaquim Bellmunt4  +167 moreInstitutions (16)
19 Oct 2017-Cell
TL;DR: An analysis of 412 muscle-invasive bladder cancers characterized by multiple TCGA analytical platforms identified 5 expression subtypes that may stratify response to different treatments and identified a poor-survival "neuronal" subtype in which the majority of tumors lacked small cell or neuroendocrine histology.

1,638 citations


Cites background from "Cancer statistics, 2017"

  • ...In the United States, there will be an estimated 79,000 new cases and 17,000 deaths in 2017 (Siegel et al., 2017)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An overview of female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening, suggests improving access to care for all populations could eliminate the racial disparity in breast cancer mortality and accelerate the reduction in deaths nationwide.
Abstract: In this article, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening. Approximately 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,610 breast cancer deaths are expected to occur among US women in 2017. From 2005 to 2014, overall breast cancer incidence rates increased among Asian/Pacific Islander (1.7% per year), non-Hispanic black (NHB) (0.4% per year), and Hispanic (0.3% per year) women but were stable in non-Hispanic white (NHW) and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The increasing trends were driven by increases in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, which increased among all racial/ethnic groups, whereas rates of hormone receptor-negative breast cancers decreased. From 1989 to 2015, breast cancer death rates decreased by 39%, which translates to 322,600 averted breast cancer deaths in the United States. During 2006 to 2015, death rates decreased in all racial/ethnic groups, including AI/ANs. However, NHB women continued to have higher breast cancer death rates than NHW women, with rates 39% higher (mortality rate ratio [MRR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.43) in NHB women in 2015, although the disparity has ceased to widen since 2011. By state, excess death rates in black women ranged from 20% in Nevada (MRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.42) to 66% in Louisiana (MRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.54, 1.79). Notably, breast cancer death rates were not significantly different in NHB and NHW women in 7 states, perhaps reflecting an elimination of disparities and/or a lack of statistical power. Improving access to care for all populations could eliminate the racial disparity in breast cancer mortality and accelerate the reduction in deaths from this malignancy nationwide. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:439-448. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

1,257 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Christopher Abbosh1, Nicolai Juul Birkbak2, Nicolai Juul Birkbak1, Gareth A. Wilson2, Gareth A. Wilson1, Mariam Jamal-Hanjani1, Tudor Constantin3, Raheleh Salari3, John Le Quesne4, David A. Moore4, Selvaraju Veeriah1, Rachel Rosenthal1, Teresa Marafioti1, Eser Kirkizlar3, Thomas B.K. Watkins1, Thomas B.K. Watkins2, Nicholas McGranahan2, Nicholas McGranahan1, Sophia Ward1, Sophia Ward2, Luke Martinson4, Joan Riley4, Francesco Fraioli1, Maise Al Bakir2, Eva Grönroos2, Francisco Zambrana1, Raymondo Endozo1, Wenya Linda Bi5, Wenya Linda Bi6, Fiona M. Fennessy5, Fiona M. Fennessy6, Nicole Sponer3, Diana Johnson1, Joanne Laycock1, Seema Shafi1, Justyna Czyzewska-Khan1, Andrew Rowan2, Tim Chambers2, Nik Matthews2, Nik Matthews7, Samra Turajlic8, Samra Turajlic2, Crispin T. Hiley1, Crispin T. Hiley2, Siow Ming Lee1, Martin Forster1, Tanya Ahmad1, Mary Falzon1, Elaine Borg1, David Lawrence1, Martin Hayward1, Shyam Kolvekar1, Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos1, Sam M. Janes1, Ricky Thakrar1, Asia Ahmed1, Fiona H Blackhall9, Yvonne Summers, Dina Hafez3, Ashwini Naik3, Apratim Ganguly3, Stephanie Kareht3, Rajesh Shah, Leena Dennis Joseph, Anne Marie Quinn, Phil Crosbie, Babu Naidu10, Gary Middleton10, Gerald Langman, Simon Trotter, Marianne Nicolson11, Hardy Remmen11, Keith M. Kerr11, Mahendran Chetty11, Lesley Gomersall11, Dean A. Fennell4, Apostolos Nakas12, Sridhar Rathinam12, Girija Anand13, Sajid Khan14, Peter Russell15, Veni Ezhil16, Babikir Ismail17, Melanie Irvin-Sellers17, Vineet Prakash17, Jason F. Lester18, Malgorzata Kornaszewska19, Richard Attanoos19, Haydn Adams18, Helen E. Davies18, Dahmane Oukrif1, Ayse U. Akarca1, John A. Hartley1, Helen Lowe1, Sara Lock20, Natasha Iles1, Harriet Bell1, Yenting Ngai1, Greg Elgar2, Zoltan Szallasi21, Zoltan Szallasi22, Zoltan Szallasi23, Roland F. Schwarz24, Javier Herrero1, Aengus Stewart2, Sergio A. Quezada1, Karl S. Peggs1, Peter Van Loo25, Peter Van Loo2, Caroline Dive9, Caroline Dive1, C. Jimmy Lin3, Matthew Rabinowitz3, Hugo J.W.L. Aerts6, Hugo J.W.L. Aerts5, Allan Hackshaw1, Jacqui Shaw4, Bernhard Zimmermann3, Charles Swanton2, Charles Swanton1 
25 May 2017-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that phylogenetic ct DNA profiling tracks the subclonal nature of lung cancer relapse and metastasis, providing a new approach for ctDNA-driven therapeutic studies.
Abstract: The early detection of relapse following primary surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer and the characterization of emerging subclones, which seed metastatic sites, might offer new therapeutic approaches for limiting tumour recurrence. The ability to track the evolutionary dynamics of early-stage lung cancer non-invasively in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has not yet been demonstrated. Here we use a tumour-specific phylogenetic approach to profile the ctDNA of the first 100 TRACERx (Tracking Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Evolution Through Therapy (Rx)) study participants, including one patient who was also recruited to the PEACE (Posthumous Evaluation of Advanced Cancer Environment) post-mortem study. We identify independent predictors of ctDNA release and analyse the tumour-volume detection limit. Through blinded profiling of postoperative plasma, we observe evidence of adjuvant chemotherapy resistance and identify patients who are very likely to experience recurrence of their lung cancer. Finally, we show that phylogenetic ctDNA profiling tracks the subclonal nature of lung cancer relapse and metastasis, providing a new approach for ctDNA-driven therapeutic studies.

1,179 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall cancer incidence trends are stable in women, but declining by 3.1% per year in men, much of which is because of recent rapid declines in prostate cancer diagnoses, and brain cancer has surpassed leukemia as the leading cause of cancer death among children and adolescents.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the National Cancer Institute (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER] Program), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (National Program of Cancer Registries), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2016, 1,685,210 new cancer cases and 595,690 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Overall cancer incidence trends (13 oldest SEER registries) are stable in women, but declining by 3.1% per year in men (from 2009-2012), much of which is because of recent rapid declines in prostate cancer diagnoses. The cancer death rate has dropped by 23% since 1991, translating to more than 1.7 million deaths averted through 2012. Despite this progress, death rates are increasing for cancers of the liver, pancreas, and uterine corpus, and cancer is now the leading cause of death in 21 states, primarily due to exceptionally large reductions in death from heart disease. Among children and adolescents (aged birth-19 years), brain cancer has surpassed leukemia as the leading cause of cancer death because of the dramatic therapeutic advances against leukemia. Accelerating progress against cancer requires both increased national investment in cancer research and the application of existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population.

14,664 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The reduction in overall cancer death rates since 1990 in men and 1991 in women translates to the avoidance of about 1,024,400 deaths from cancer, which can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population, with an emphasis on those groups in the lowest socioeconomic bracket.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths expected in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival based on incidence data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics. A total of 1,638,910 new cancer cases and 577,190 deaths from cancer are projected to occur in the United States in 2012. During the most recent 5 years for which there are data (2004-2008), overall cancer incidence rates declined slightly in men (by 0.6% per year) and were stable in women, while cancer death rates decreased by 1.8% per year in men and by 1.6% per year in women. Over the past 10 years of available data (1999-2008), cancer death rates have declined by more than 1% per year in men and women of every racial/ethnic group with the exception of American Indians/Alaska Natives, among whom rates have remained stable. The most rapid declines in death rates occurred among African American and Hispanic men (2.4% and 2.3% per year, respectively). Death rates continue to decline for all 4 major cancer sites (lung, colorectum, breast, and prostate), with lung cancer accounting for almost 40% of the total decline in men and breast cancer accounting for 34% of the total decline in women. The reduction in overall cancer death rates since 1990 in men and 1991 in women translates to the avoidance of about 1,024,400 deaths from cancer. Further progress can be accelerated by applying existing cancer control knowledge across all segments of the population, with an emphasis on those groups in the lowest socioeconomic bracket.

10,630 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer, as compared with the radiography group, and the rate of death from any cause was reduced.
Abstract: Background The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer. Methods From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U.S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009. Results The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P=0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P=0.02). Conclusions Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; National Lung Screening Trial ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385.).

7,710 citations

01 Jan 2006

7,442 citations


"Cancer statistics, 2017" refers background or methods in this paper

  • ...For example, comparing patients diagnosed in the mid-1970s with those diagnosed during 2006 to 2012, the 5-year relative survival rate has increased from 41% to 71% for acute lymphocytic leukemia and from 22% to 66% for chronic myeloid leukemia.(9) Most patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors experience near normal life expectancy, particularly those diagnosed before age 65 years, based on a recent review of clinical trial data....

    [...]

  • ...Some of the statistical information presented herein was adapted from data previously published in the SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2013.(9) NAACCR compiles and reports incidence data from 1995 onward for cancer registries that participate in the SEER program and/or the NPCR....

    [...]

01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: The scientific evidence is incontrovertible: inhaling tobacco smoke, particularly from cigarettes, is deadly.
Abstract: The scientific evidence is incontrovertible: inhaling tobacco smoke, particularly from cigarettes, is deadly. Since the first Surgeon General’s Report in 1964, evidence has linked smoking to diseases of nearly all organs of the body. • In the United States, smoking causes 87 percent of lung cancer deaths, 32 percent of coronary heart disease deaths, and 79 percent of all cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

5,061 citations

Trending Questions (3)
Which are the current statistics for cancer?

The current statistics for cancer in the United States in 2017 are projected to be 1,688,780 new cancer cases and 600,920 cancer deaths.

Cancer servic statistic

The paper provides statistics on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival in the United States. It estimates that in 2017, there will be 1,688,780 new cancer cases and 600,920 cancer deaths in the country.

Cancer statistics, 2016,CA Cancer J Clin.

The provided paper is about cancer statistics in the United States. However, there is no information about cancer statistics in 2016 in the paper.