Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency
Citations
7 citations
Cites result from "Capital-labor substitution and econ..."
...This value is close to the original 0.57 estimated by Arrow et al. (1961)....
[...]
7 citations
7 citations
Cites background or methods from "Capital-labor substitution and econ..."
...Thus, from agent 1s perspective we have the following dynamics of the ltered drift (and variance) and disagreement of the dynamic linear economy (7) and (8): dm(t) = a m(t) dt+ i (t) dW i Y (t) ; and (21) d (t) = (t) (t) dt+ (t) dW 1 Y (t) (22) = ( (t) (t)) (t) dt+ (t) dW 2 Y (t) ; (23) where (t) = B (1)A aA (1)B 2 (t)AB 1 ; (24) (t) = B (1)A 1 (t) 2 (t) AB (1); and (25) i (t) = i (t)AB (1): (26) In order to specify dm(t), d (t) ; we need to specify the matrix-triplet f (t) ; (t) ; (t)g24....
[...]
...The conditional Gaussian lter for the linear dynamic economy (7) and (8) follows from theorems 12....
[...]
...From now on we use the following symbols for the generalized binomial coe¢ cients53: Fn (~x; ~y) := ~y( 1)(n+1) 1 n ~x ~y 1 n 1 and Fn (~x) := ( 1)(n+1) 1 n ~x n 1 : Proposition 3 (Equilibrium Characterization): Given the assumptions above, the agent s optimal consumptions54 are equal to bk1 (t) = " 1 1X n=1 Fn n &k ~ k (t) n k2 # 1f~ k(t)>Zkg + 1X n=1 Fn (n&k) ~ k (t) n k1 1f~ k(t)<Zkg; and (76) bk2 (t) = 1X n=1 Fn n &k ~ k (t) n k2 1f~ k(t)>Zkg + " 1 1X n=1 Fn (n&k) ~ k (t) n k1 # 1f~ k(t)<Zkg: (77) The representative agent s state price densities for each good are k (t) = 1X n=0 Fn n &k ; k1 ~ 1 k (t) 1 n k2 ~ 2 k (t) n k2 1f~ k(t)>Zkg + 1X n=0 Fn n&k; k 2 ~ 1 k (t) n k1 ~ 2 k (t) 1 n k1 1f~ k(t)<Zkg; (78) where Zk = (&k 1)&k 1 & &k k k1 is the radius for absolute convergence of the series....
[...]
...From (62) we can conclude that (T ) (t) = (T ) (t) and the dynamic of the stochastic weight- ing yields tod (T ) (T ) = d (T ) (T ) : The relative price follows from the absolute convergence of bm1 (t) and b m 2 (t) by applying p (t) = @ @ 2 U( 2(t); (t)) @ @ 1 V ( 1(t); (t)) ; see also Basak (2005) for similar considerations....
[...]
...Proof of Proposition 16 (Moment-Generating Function): From (73) we get132 ~ i k (u) ~ i k (t) l (u) l (t) = exp ( i (u t)) k (u) k (t) [ ki+(1 ki ) ki ] k (u) k (t) (1 ki ) ki l (u) l (t) ; k; l = 1; 2: (403) 132See also Radon-Nikodym Density Processs, in section 3....
[...]
7 citations
Additional excerpts
...CES A x A i r i n i i r t r i = , > 0, 0 , 0 < 1, =1 ∑ ≥ ≠ for all (1)...
[...]
7 citations
References
10,850 citations
3,961 citations
1,031 citations