Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency
Citations
4 citations
4 citations
4 citations
Cites background from "Capital-labor substitution and econ..."
...…other) function predicting income on the left-hand side, being methodologically backed by a very loose theoretical concept such as the SMAC framework (Arrow et al., 1961; Lu and Fletcher, 1968), seems to be the only option to test a conjecture such as Olson’s in a way which is compatible with…...
[...]
...…allows us to compare the results with nearly all the most frequently used production functions under the umbrella of CES (constant elasticity of substitution) (Arrow et al., 1961) and its Lu-Fletcher extended version (a type of VES, variable elasticity of substitution; Lu and Fletcher, 1968)....
[...]
4 citations
4 citations
Cites background or methods from "Capital-labor substitution and econ..."
...The seminal contribution in this respect is Arrow et al. (1961), who derive the CES function and suggest one way of estimating the elasticity of substitution under the additional assumption of perfect competition. A more recent contribution is provided by Duffy and Papageorgiou (2000), who uses panel data on 82 countries over 28 years to estimate a CES specification....
[...]
...For instance, assuming a more general CES (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) technology allows for endogenous growth (see for instance Jones and Manuelli (1990)) for some parameter values and multiple stable equilibrium configurations with respect to the labor share for others (see Azariadis (1996)). Also, in a recent paper Kauppi et al. (2004) establish a relationship between wages and the capital-labor share by assuming a CES production function coupled with imperfections in both labor and product markets....
[...]
...The seminal contribution in this respect is Arrow et al. (1961), who derive the CES function and suggest one way of estimating the elasticity of substitution under the additional assumption of perfect competition....
[...]
...This development has partly been due to the empirical observation that factor shares have not remained constant (see for example Bentolila and Saint-Paul (2003)) casting doubts on the validity of the popular Cobb-Douglas specification(1). More importantly, the revival of growth theory during the last decade (see Quah (1996) and Solow (1994)) makes the issue topical since different functional specifications can lead to different and richer theoretical results. For instance, assuming a more general CES (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) technology allows for endogenous growth (see for instance Jones and Manuelli (1990)) for some parameter values and multiple stable equilibrium configurations with respect to the labor share for others (see Azariadis (1996))....
[...]
...(16)Arrow et al. (1961) show that b in the regression yt = a + bwt + t provides an estimate of the elasticity of substitution when labor and product markets are competitive....
[...]
References
10,850 citations
3,961 citations
1,031 citations