scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Findings suggest patterns of mHealth use may inform how to target mHealth interventions to enhance reach and facilitate healthy behaviors, with notable contrasts between those who do and do not use devices to track goals.
Abstract
Background: Multiple types of mobile health (mHealth) technologies are available, such as smartphone health apps, fitness trackers, and digital medical devices. However, despite their availability, some individuals do not own, do not realize they own, or own but do not use these technologies. Others may use mHealth devices, but their use varies in tracking health, behaviors, and goals. Examining patterns of mHealth use at the population level can advance our understanding of technology use for health and behavioral tracking. Moreover, investigating sociodemographic and health-related correlates of these patterns can provide direction to researchers about how to target mHealth interventions for diverse audiences. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify patterns of mHealth use for health and behavioral tracking in the US adult population and to characterize the population according to those patterns. Methods: We combined data from the 2017 and 2018 National Cancer Institute Health Information National Trends Survey (N=6789) to characterize respondents according to 5 mutually exclusive reported patterns of mHealth use for health and behavioral tracking: (1) mHealth nonowners and nonusers report not owning or using devices to track health, behaviors, or goals; (2) supertrackers track health or behaviors and goals using a smartphone or tablet plus other devices (eg, Fitbit); (3) app trackers use only a smartphone or tablet; (4) device trackers use only nonsmartphone or nontablet devices and do not track goals; and (5) nontrackers report having smartphone or tablet health apps but do not track health, behaviors, or goals. Results: Being in the mHealth nonowners and nonusers category (vs all mHealth owners and users) is associated with males, older age, lower income, and not being a health information seeker. Among mHealth owners and users, characteristics of device trackers and supertrackers were most distinctive. Compared with supertrackers, device trackers have higher odds of being male (odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI 1.55-3.19), older age (vs 18-34 years; 50-64 years: OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.52-5.30; 65+ years: OR 6.28, 95% CI 3.35-11.79), have an annual household income of US $20,000 to US $49,999 (vs US $75,000+: OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.36-3.91), and have a chronic condition (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.14-2.49). Device trackers also have higher odds of not being health information seekers than supertrackers (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.66-5.33). Conclusions: Findings revealed distinctive sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of the population by pattern of mHealth use, with notable contrasts between those who do and do not use devices to track goals. Several characteristics of individuals who track health or behaviors but not goals (device trackers) are similar to those of mHealth nonowners and nonusers. Our results suggest patterns of mHealth use may inform how to target mHealth interventions to enhance reach and facilitate healthy behaviors.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The need for feminist intersectionality in digital health.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that digital health is rarely designed from a gender equity perspective, and that lower access and exclusion from app design, gender imbalance in digital health leadership, and harmful gender stereotypes are among the factors that can worsen women's health.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient generated health data: Benefits and challenges.

TL;DR: Patient Generated Health Data (PGHD) is defined as data generated by and from patients as mentioned in this paper and is a powerful tool in delivering safe, effective, patient centered, efficient and equitable care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Chinese Patients' Intention to Use Different Types of Internet Hospitals: Cross-sectional Study on Virtual Visits

TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper examined patients' intention to use virtual visits, as well as virtual visits delivered by different sponsorship types of internet hospitals, and identified determinants of patients' intentions of using virtual visits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating Asthma Mobile Apps to Improve Asthma Self-Management: User Ratings and Sentiment Analysis of Publicly Available Apps.

TL;DR: The study results demonstrate that asthma app quality, maintenance, and updates vary widely across apps and platforms and may call into question the long-term engagement with asthma apps, a crucial factor for determining their potential to improve asthma self-management and asthma clinical outcomes.
References
More filters
Journal Article

Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation

TL;DR: The authors summarize 35 years of empirical research on goal-setting theory, describing the core findings of the theory, the mechanisms by which goals operate, moderators of goal effects, the relation of goals and satisfaction, and the role of goals as mediators of incentives.
Journal ArticleDOI

Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize 35 years of empirical research on goal-setting theory and describe the core findings of the theory, the mechanisms by which goals operate, moderators of goal effects, the relation of goals and satisfaction, and the role of goals as mediators of incentives.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey

TL;DR: It is suggested that app developers need to better address consumer concerns, such as cost and high data entry burden, and that clinical trials are necessary to test the efficacy of health apps to broaden their appeal and adoption.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.

TL;DR: This review aimed to synthesise literature on engagement to identify key conceptualisations and to develop an integrative conceptual framework involving potential direct and indirect influences on engagement and relationships between engagement and intervention effectiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review.

TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic review examined the efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adults in a randomized controlled trial and found that multi-component interventions appear to be more effective than stand-alone app interventions.
Related Papers (5)