Abstract: For a hundred years it was known that motile bacteria are attracted to a variety of small organic molecules. However, few scientists were interested in bacterial chemotaxis, probably because they were unwilling to believe that these lowly organisms possessed any capability for information processing or could exhibit even simple forms of behavior. Despite evidence to the contrary, it was generally assumed that chemotaxis and metabolism were hopelessly entwined. Bacteria simply congregated where the food was; after all, that was where growth rates were fastest. Julius Adler broke this prejudice. Undaunted by peer pressure, Adler set out to uncover the molecular basis for bacterial chemotaxis and, in particular, to test rigorously the perceived connection between this phenomenon and metabolism. First he modified a method developed by Pfeffer in the 1880s to permit a quantitative analysis of chemotaxis with Escherichia coli, an experimentally tractable organism. Basically this method involves inserting a capillary containing an attractant solution into a suspension of bacteria and then counting the cells that swim into the tube after a defined incubation period. Legend has it that he searched the sewers of Madison, Wis., to find an intelligent strain of E. coli. Domesticated strains, which are used to a life of luxury, had become either stupid or paralyzed. The paper is written in a beautifully clear, Socratic style; questions are posed and answers are provided. With this quantitative assay, Adler presented five lines of evidence demonstrating that bacteria have chemoreceptors for attractants: (i) some metabolites fail to attract, (ii) some attractants cannot be metabolized, (iii) attractants can be detected even when cells are flooded with metabolites, (iv) competition is observed with structurally related attractants, and (v) mutants defective in chemotaxis can still metabolize the molecule in question. Moreover, using attractant competition and mutant analysis, he went on to identify at least five different chemoreceptors. Appropriately enough, the paper ends with a section entitled “Implications for neurobiology and behavioral biology.” Adler's elegantly simple experiments demonstrated that bacteria such as E. coli can sense and process environmental information with surprising sophistication. Now many scientists were “attracted” to chemotaxis, and the field grew exponentially. What is remarkable is the diversity of these scientific converts. They include mathematicians and physicists, biochemists and structural biologists, geneticists and molecular biologists, and neurobiologists. Despite the fact that the components of E. coli's “brain” have been identified and analyzed in great detail, important questions remain, including the basis for the large range of ligand sensitivity and the mechanisms of signal amplification and adaptation. Because these questions are fundamental to any sensory system, it is likely that bacterial chemotaxis will remain at the forefront of this important research field. Julius Adler spawned an enormously productive enterprise. THOMAS J. SILHAVY