scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine-root trait variation

TL;DR: This study reveals both the large variation in fine-root traits encountered globally and the relevance of several key plant functional types and soil and climate variables for explaining a substantial part of this variation.
Abstract: 1.Ecosystem functioning relies heavily on belowground processes, which are largely regulated by plant fine-roots and their functional traits. However, our knowledge of fine-root trait distribution relies to date on local- and regional-scale studies with limited numbers of species, growth forms and environmental variation. 2.We compiled a worldwide fine-root trait dataset, featuring 1115 species from contrasting climatic areas, phylogeny and growth forms to test a series of hypotheses pertaining to the influence of plant functional types, soil and climate variables, and the degree of manipulation of plant growing conditions on species fine-root trait variation. Most particularly, we tested the competing hypotheses that fine-root traits typical of faster return on investment would be most strongly associated with conditions of limiting versus favourable soil resource availability. We accounted for both data source and species phylogenetic relatedness. 3.We demonstrate that (1) Climate conditions promoting soil fertility relate negatively to fine-root traits favouring fast soil resource acquisition, with a particularly strong positive effect of temperature on fine-root diameter and negative effect on specific root length (SRL), and a negative effect of rainfall on root nitrogen concentration; (2) Soil bulk density strongly influences species fine-root morphology, by favouring thicker, denser fine-roots; (3) Fine-roots from herbaceous species are on average finer and have higher SRL than those of woody species, and N2-fixing capacity positively relates to root nitrogen; (4) Plants growing in pots have higher SRL than those grown in the field. 4.Synthesis. This study reveals both the large variation in fine-root traits encountered globally and the relevance of several key plant functional types and soil and climate variables for explaining a substantial part of this variation. Climate, particularly temperature, and plant functional types were the two strongest predictors of fine-root trait variation. High trait variation occurred at local scales, suggesting that wide-ranging belowground resource economics strategies are viable within most climatic areas and soil conditions.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Version postprint
Comment citer ce document :
Freschet, G., Valverde-Barrantes , O. J., Tucker, Craine, J., McCormack, M. L., Violle, Fort,
F., Blackwood, Urban-Mead, Iversen, C. M., Bonis, A., Comas , L. H., Cornelissen, J. H. C.,
Dong, Guo, D., Hobbie , S. E., Holdaway, R., Kembel, S., Makita , N., Onipchenko , V. G.,
Picon-Cochard, C., Reich, P. B., De la Riva , E. G., Smith , S. W., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tjoelker,
M. G., Wardle, D. A., Roumet (2017). Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of
global fine-root trait variation. Journal of Ecology, 105 (5), 1182-1196. , DOI : 10.1111/1365-2745.12769
Accepted Article
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not
been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may
lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12769
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
DR. GRÉGOIRE THOMAS FRESCHET (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-8830-3860)
Received Date : 09-Dec-2016
Revised Date : 23-Feb-2017
Accepted Date : 28-Feb-2017
Article type : Standard Papers
Handling Editor: James Cahill
Title: Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine-root trait variation
Type of article: Standard Papers
Short title: Global variation in fine-root traits
Authors’ names and addresses:
Grégoire T. Freschet
1*
, Oscar J. Valverde-Barrantes
2†
, Caroline M. Tucker
1
, Joseph M.
Craine
3
, M. Luke McCormack
4
, Cyrille Violle
1
, Florian Fort
1,5
, Christopher B. Blackwood
2
,
Katherine R. Urban-Mead
1
, Colleen M. Iversen
6
, Anne Bonis
7
, Louise H. Comas
8
, Johannes
H. C. Cornelissen
9
, Ming Dong
10
, Dali Guo
11
, Sarah E. Hobbie
12
, Robert J. Holdaway
13
,
Steven W. Kembel
14
, Naoki Makita
15
, Vladimir G. Onipchenko
16
, Catherine Picon-
Cochard
17
, Peter B. Reich
18, 19
, Enrique G. de la Riva
20
, Stuart W. Smith
21
, Nadejda A.
Soudzilovskaia
22
, Mark G. Tjoelker
19
, David A. Wardle
23
, Catherine Roumet
1
1
Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175 (CNRS Université de
Montpellier Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier EPHE), 1919 route de Mende,
Montpellier 34293, France
2
Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA
3
Jonah Ventures, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA

Version postprint
Comment citer ce document :
Freschet, G., Valverde-Barrantes , O. J., Tucker, Craine, J., McCormack, M. L., Violle, Fort,
F., Blackwood, Urban-Mead, Iversen, C. M., Bonis, A., Comas , L. H., Cornelissen, J. H. C.,
Dong, Guo, D., Hobbie , S. E., Holdaway, R., Kembel, S., Makita , N., Onipchenko , V. G.,
Picon-Cochard, C., Reich, P. B., De la Riva , E. G., Smith , S. W., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tjoelker,
M. G., Wardle, D. A., Roumet (2017). Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of
global fine-root trait variation. Journal of Ecology, 105 (5), 1182-1196. , DOI : 10.1111/1365-2745.12769
Accepted Article
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
4
Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN
55108, USA
5
INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR, Centre de recherche de Toulouse, CS 52627, 31326 Castanet-
Tolosan Cedex, France
6
Climate Change Science Institute and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
7
UMR 6553 ECOBIO: Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Evolution, CNRS-University of Rennes 1,
OSU Rennes, France
8
USDA-ARS Water Management Research Unit, 2150 Centre Avenue, Bldg D Suite 320,
Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
9
Systems Ecology, Department of Ecological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan
1085, Amsterdam 1081 HV, the Netherlands
10
Key Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of
Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
11
Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic
Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,
China
12
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
55108, USA
13
Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
14
Département des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal,
Québec, Canada
15
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
16
Department of Geobotany, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State Lomonosov University,
119234 Moscow, Russia

Version postprint
Comment citer ce document :
Freschet, G., Valverde-Barrantes , O. J., Tucker, Craine, J., McCormack, M. L., Violle, Fort,
F., Blackwood, Urban-Mead, Iversen, C. M., Bonis, A., Comas , L. H., Cornelissen, J. H. C.,
Dong, Guo, D., Hobbie , S. E., Holdaway, R., Kembel, S., Makita , N., Onipchenko , V. G.,
Picon-Cochard, C., Reich, P. B., De la Riva , E. G., Smith , S. W., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tjoelker,
M. G., Wardle, D. A., Roumet (2017). Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of
global fine-root trait variation. Journal of Ecology, 105 (5), 1182-1196. , DOI : 10.1111/1365-2745.12769
Accepted Article
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
17
INRA, UR874, Grassland Ecosystem Research Team, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63039
Clermont-Ferrand, France
18
Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
19
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797,
Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
20
Área de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
21
Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491
Trondheim, Norway
22
Conservation Biology Department, Institute of Environmental Sciences, CML, Leiden
University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands
23
Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural
Sciences, SE901-83 Umea, Sweden
Present address: International Center for Tropical Botany, Department of Biological
Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, OE 243 Miami, FL 33199,
USA
* Correspondence:
Grégoire T. Freschet; Address: Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, 1919 route de
Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. Phone: 0033 (0)467613340; Fax:
0033(0)467613336; Email: gregoire.freschet@cefe.cnrs.fr

Version postprint
Comment citer ce document :
Freschet, G., Valverde-Barrantes , O. J., Tucker, Craine, J., McCormack, M. L., Violle, Fort,
F., Blackwood, Urban-Mead, Iversen, C. M., Bonis, A., Comas , L. H., Cornelissen, J. H. C.,
Dong, Guo, D., Hobbie , S. E., Holdaway, R., Kembel, S., Makita , N., Onipchenko , V. G.,
Picon-Cochard, C., Reich, P. B., De la Riva , E. G., Smith , S. W., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tjoelker,
M. G., Wardle, D. A., Roumet (2017). Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of
global fine-root trait variation. Journal of Ecology, 105 (5), 1182-1196. , DOI : 10.1111/1365-2745.12769
Accepted Article
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
1. Ecosystem functioning relies heavily on belowground processes, which are largely
regulated by plant fine-roots and their functional traits. However, our knowledge of fine-root
trait distribution relies to date on local- and regional-scale studies with limited numbers of
species, growth forms and environmental variation.
2. We compiled a worldwide fine-root trait dataset, featuring 1115 species from contrasting
climatic areas, phylogeny and growth forms to test a series of hypotheses pertaining to the
influence of plant functional types, soil and climate variables, and the degree of manipulation
of plant growing conditions on species fine-root trait variation. Most particularly, we tested
the competing hypotheses that fine-root traits typical of faster return on investment would be
most strongly associated with conditions of limiting versus favourable soil resource
availability. We accounted for both data source and species phylogenetic relatedness.
3. We demonstrate that (1) Climate conditions promoting soil fertility relate negatively to
fine-root traits favouring fast soil resource acquisition, with a particularly strong positive
effect of temperature on fine-root diameter and negative effect on specific root length (SRL),
and a negative effect of rainfall on root nitrogen concentration; (2) Soil bulk density strongly
influences species fine-root morphology, by favouring thicker, denser fine-roots; (3) Fine-
roots from herbaceous species are on average finer and have higher SRL than those of woody
species, and N
2
-fixing capacity positively relates to root nitrogen; (4) Plants growing in pots
have higher SRL than those grown in the field.
4. Synthesis. This study reveals both the large variation in fine-root traits encountered
globally and the relevance of several key plant functional types and soil and climate variables
for explaining a substantial part of this variation. Climate, particularly temperature, and plant
functional types were the two strongest predictors of fine-root trait variation. High trait

Version postprint
Comment citer ce document :
Freschet, G., Valverde-Barrantes , O. J., Tucker, Craine, J., McCormack, M. L., Violle, Fort,
F., Blackwood, Urban-Mead, Iversen, C. M., Bonis, A., Comas , L. H., Cornelissen, J. H. C.,
Dong, Guo, D., Hobbie , S. E., Holdaway, R., Kembel, S., Makita , N., Onipchenko , V. G.,
Picon-Cochard, C., Reich, P. B., De la Riva , E. G., Smith , S. W., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tjoelker,
M. G., Wardle, D. A., Roumet (2017). Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of
global fine-root trait variation. Journal of Ecology, 105 (5), 1182-1196. , DOI : 10.1111/1365-2745.12769
Accepted Article
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
variation occurred at local scales, suggesting that wide-ranging belowground resource
economics strategies are viable within most climatic areas and soil conditions.
Keywords: database; fine roots; functional biogeography; functional traits; N
2
-fixation;
phylogeny; plant growth form; plant resource economics; root function; soil properties
Introduction
Fine roots perform essential functions for plants including nutrient and water acquisition
(Waisel et al. 2002) and influence a broad spectrum of ecological processes, from net primary
production (Cadotte et al. 2009) to nutrient cycling (Freschet et al. 2013b; Hobbie 2015) and
soil formation (Iversen 2010; Clemmensen et al. 2013; Bardgett et al. 2014). The influence of
fine roots on these plant and ecosystem processes is largely mediated by their morphological,
chemical and physiological traits (Bardgett et al. 2014). Similarly, differences in fine-root
traits among species are thought to represent their evolutionary history and adaptations to a
wide range of biotic and abiotic factors (Kembel & Cahill 2011; Comas et al. 2012).
As evidenced by a number of global syntheses on these topics, a considerable number of
studies have explored the variation in ecosystem root biomass (e.g. Jackson et al. 1997), their
vertical distribution in soils (Schenk & Jackson 2002), their fluctuations in productivity (Vogt
et al. 1995) and turnover (Gill & Jackson 2000). Accounts of variation in morphological or
chemical fine-root traits across ecosystems are also relatively common (e.g. Jackson et al.
1997; Iversen et al. 2015). However, to accurately determine the drivers of fine-root trait
distribution, we need to focus most particularly on their variation at the level of species and
plant individuals (e.g. Laughlin 2014; Violle et al. 2014), similar to what has been performed
for leaf traits (e.g. Wright et al. 2005b; Maire et al. 2015). Current accounts of species fine-
root trait variation are to date most often limited to the regional scale, focus either on woody

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A holistic view of the belowground economy is taken and it is shown that root-mycorrhizal collaboration can short circuit a one-dimensional economic spectrum, providing an entire space of economic possibilities.
Abstract: Plant economics run on carbon and nutrients instead of money. Leaf strategies aboveground span an economic spectrum from "live fast and die young" to "slow and steady," but the economy defined by root strategies belowground remains unclear. Here, we take a holistic view of the belowground economy and show that root-mycorrhizal collaboration can short circuit a one-dimensional economic spectrum, providing an entire space of economic possibilities. Root trait data from 1810 species across the globe confirm a classical fast-slow "conservation" gradient but show that most variation is explained by an orthogonal "collaboration" gradient, ranging from "do-it-yourself" resource uptake to "outsourcing" of resource uptake to mycorrhizal fungi. This broadened "root economics space" provides a solid foundation for predictive understanding of belowground responses to changing environmental conditions.

268 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that below-ground traits with widest importance in plant and ecosystem functioning are not those most commonly measured, and advocate that establishing causal hierarchical links among root traits will provide a hypothesis-based framework to identify the most parsimonious sets of traits with strongest influence on the functions, and to link genotypes to plant andcosystem functioning.
Abstract: The effects of plants on the biosphere, atmosphere and geosphere are key determinants of terrestrial ecosystem functioning. However, despite substantial progress made regarding plant belowground components, we are still only beginning to explore the complex relationships between root traits and functions. Drawing on the literature in plant physiology, ecophysiology, ecology, agronomy and soil science, we reviewed 24 aspects of plant and ecosystem functioning and their relationships with a number of root system traits, including aspects of architecture, physiology, morphology, anatomy, chemistry, biomechanics and biotic interactions. Based on this assessment, we critically evaluated the current strengths and gaps in our knowledge, and identify future research challenges in the field of root ecology. Most importantly, we found that belowground traits with the broadest importance in plant and ecosystem functioning are not those most commonly measured. Also, the estimation of trait relative importance for functioning requires us to consider a more comprehensive range of functionally relevant traits from a diverse range of species, across environments and over time series. We also advocate that establishing causal hierarchical links among root traits will provide a hypothesis-based framework to identify the most parsimonious sets of traits with the strongest links on functions, and to link genotypes to plant and ecosystem functioning.

205 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the root density, mycorrhizal association and rhizodeposition contribute to microaggregation of soil organic matter (SOM) in the soil.
Abstract: Plant roots contribute substantially to the formation of stable soil organic matter (SOM), and there is evidence that species differ in their contribution to SOM stabilization. However, it remains unclear what specific root traits contribute to the three SOM stabilization mechanisms: recalcitrance against decomposition, occlusion in soil aggregates and interaction with soil minerals and metals. This is likely because research is highly fragmented and hampered by disciplinary barriers. By reviewing both plant functional ecology and soil science literature, we identified 18 different traits: architectural, morphological, physiological, symbiotic and chemical root characteristics, influencing the three SOM stabilization mechanisms. We found that traits increasing root recalcitrance promote short term stabilization by slowing decomposition, but that traits reducing recalcitrance contribute to long term stabilization by reaction of microbial products with mineral surfaces. Root length density, mycorrhizal association and rhizodeposition contribute to microaggregation. These and other traits, such as hemicellulose, soluble compounds, and high root branching index, favor macroaggregation. For stabilization by minerals and metals, those root traits promoting higher microbial activity: root nitrogen, hemicellulose and soluble compound concentrations are fundamental, while polyphenols, and litter Al and Mn also contribute to complexification and stabilization. Root depth distribution is the most important trait to control root C storage and stabilization in the subsoil; once roots have reached deeper soil layers, other traits, such as rhizodeposition and root chemistry, influence interaction with minerals and metals. Both mycorrhizal presence and root suberin promote SOC stabilization by means of all three mechanisms, indicating that these are important targets for continued work. Surprisingly, morphological traits commonly measured, namely specific root length and root diameter, poorly relate to stabilization mechanisms. Alternative traits such as chemical composition of the different root orders, root apex characteristics, quantity and quality of rhizodeposits as well as mycorrhizal fungal traits, should be further investigated. For future research, this review highlights the need to evaluate root decomposition and root-C stabilization concomitantly over the long-term, considering simultaneously root litter quality, estimated by root traits, the microbial products and properties of the soil matrix. The information accrued in this review can be used to evaluate the potential of plant species and cultivars to promote SOM stabilization, based on their root traits.

182 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A major aim of this guide is to help break down barriers between the many subdisciplines of root ecology and ecophysiology, broaden researchers’ views on the multiple aspects of root study and create favourable conditions for the inception of comprehensive experiments on the role of roots in plant and ecosystem functioning.
Abstract: In the context of a recent massive increase in research on plant root functions and their impact on the environment, root ecologists currently face many important challenges to keep on generating cutting-edge, meaningful and integrated knowledge. Consideration of the below-ground components in plant and ecosystem studies has been consistently called for in recent decades, but methodology is disparate and sometimes inappropriate. This handbook, based on the collective effort of a large team of experts, will improve trait comparisons across studies and integration of information across databases by providing standardised methods and controlled vocabularies. It is meant to be used not only as starting point by students and scientists who desire working on below-ground ecosystems, but also by experts for consolidating and broadening their views on multiple aspects of root ecology. Beyond the classical compilation of measurement protocols, we have synthesised recommendations from the literature to provide key background knowledge useful for: (1) defining below-ground plant entities and giving keys for their meaningful dissection, classification and naming beyond the classical fine-root vs coarse-root approach; (2) considering the specificity of root research to produce sound laboratory and field data; (3) describing typical, but overlooked steps for studying roots (e.g. root handling, cleaning and storage); and (4) gathering metadata necessary for the interpretation of results and their reuse. Most importantly, all root traits have been introduced with some degree of ecological context that will be a foundation for understanding their ecological meaning, their typical use and uncertainties, and some methodological and conceptual perspectives for future research. Considering all of this, we urge readers not to solely extract protocol recommendations for trait measurements from this work, but to take a moment to read and reflect on the extensive information contained in this broader guide to root ecology, including sections I-VII and the many introductions to each section and root trait description. Finally, it is critical to understand that a major aim of this guide is to help break down barriers between the many subdisciplines of root ecology and ecophysiology, broaden researchers' views on the multiple aspects of root study and create favourable conditions for the inception of comprehensive experiments on the role of roots in plant and ecosystem functioning.

156 citations

Posted ContentDOI
17 Jan 2020-bioRxiv
TL;DR: It is shown that root-mycorrhizal collaboration can short circuit a one-dimensional economic spectrum, providing an entire space of economic possibilities forRoot economics, ranging from ‘do-it-yourself’ resource acquisition to ‘outsourcing’ to mycorrhIZal partners.
Abstract: Plant economics run on carbon and nutrients instead of money. Leaf strategies aboveground span an economic spectrum from ‘live fast and die young’ to ‘slow and steady’, but the economy defined by root strategies belowground remains unclear. Here we take a holistic view of the belowground economy, and show that root-mycorrhizal collaboration can short circuit a one-dimensional economic spectrum, providing an entire space of economic possibilities. Root trait data from 1,781 species across the globe confirm a classical fast-slow ‘conservation’ gradient but show that most variation is explained by an orthogonal ‘collaboration’ gradient, ranging from ‘do-it-yourself’ resource uptake to ‘outsourcing’ of resource uptake to mycorrhizal fungi. This broadened ‘root economics space’ provides a solid foundation for predictive understanding of belowground responses to changing environmental conditions. One Sentence Summary Collaboration broadens the ‘root economics space’ ranging from ‘do-it-yourself’ resource acquisition to ‘outsourcing’ to mycorrhizal partners.

155 citations

References
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: Copyright (©) 1999–2012 R Foundation for Statistical Computing; permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and permission notice are preserved on all copies.
Abstract: Copyright (©) 1999–2012 R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all copies. Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission notice identical to this one. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that this permission notice may be stated in a translation approved by the R Core Team.

272,030 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a model is described in an lmer call by a formula, in this case including both fixed-and random-effects terms, and the formula and data together determine a numerical representation of the model from which the profiled deviance or the profeatured REML criterion can be evaluated as a function of some of model parameters.
Abstract: Maximum likelihood or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates of the parameters in linear mixed-effects models can be determined using the lmer function in the lme4 package for R. As for most model-fitting functions in R, the model is described in an lmer call by a formula, in this case including both fixed- and random-effects terms. The formula and data together determine a numerical representation of the model from which the profiled deviance or the profiled REML criterion can be evaluated as a function of some of the model parameters. The appropriate criterion is optimized, using one of the constrained optimization functions in R, to provide the parameter estimates. We describe the structure of the model, the steps in evaluating the profiled deviance or REML criterion, and the structure of classes or types that represents such a model. Sufficient detail is included to allow specialization of these structures by users who wish to write functions to fit specialized linear mixed models, such as models incorporating pedigrees or smoothing splines, that are not easily expressible in the formula language used by lmer.

50,607 citations


"Climate, soil and plant functional ..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...The BLUPs were calculated with mixed linear model (lmer() in ‘LME4’ package; Bates et al. 2015): these were used as the species’ mean trait values in the subsequent analyses....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas (excluding Antarctica) at a spatial resolution of 30 arc s (often referred to as 1-km spatial resolution).
Abstract: We developed interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas (excluding Antarctica) at a spatial resolution of 30 arc s (often referred to as 1-km spatial resolution). The climate elements considered were monthly precipitation and mean, minimum, and maximum temperature. Input data were gathered from a variety of sources and, where possible, were restricted to records from the 1950–2000 period. We used the thin-plate smoothing spline algorithm implemented in the ANUSPLIN package for interpolation, using latitude, longitude, and elevation as independent variables. We quantified uncertainty arising from the input data and the interpolation by mapping weather station density, elevation bias in the weather stations, and elevation variation within grid cells and through data partitioning and cross validation. Elevation bias tended to be negative (stations lower than expected) at high latitudes but positive in the tropics. Uncertainty is highest in mountainous and in poorly sampled areas. Data partitioning showed high uncertainty of the surfaces on isolated islands, e.g. in the Pacific. Aggregating the elevation and climate data to 10 arc min resolution showed an enormous variation within grid cells, illustrating the value of high-resolution surfaces. A comparison with an existing data set at 10 arc min resolution showed overall agreement, but with significant variation in some regions. A comparison with two high-resolution data sets for the United States also identified areas with large local differences, particularly in mountainous areas. Compared to previous global climatologies, ours has the following advantages: the data are at a higher spatial resolution (400 times greater or more); more weather station records were used; improved elevation data were used; and more information about spatial patterns of uncertainty in the data is available. Owing to the overall low density of available climate stations, our surfaces do not capture of all variation that may occur at a resolution of 1 km, particularly of precipitation in mountainous areas. In future work, such variation might be captured through knowledgebased methods and inclusion of additional co-variates, particularly layers obtained through remote sensing. Copyright  2005 Royal Meteorological Society.

17,977 citations


"Climate, soil and plant functional ..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...Owing to gaps in locally measured climate data, we used climate data available from the Worldclim database (Hijmans et al. 2005) to represent common-garden and field observations....

    [...]

  • ...data available from the Worldclim database (Hijmans et al. 2005) to...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new, multifunctional phylogenetics package, phytools, for the R statistical computing environment is presented, with a focus on phylogenetic tree-building in 2.1.
Abstract: Summary 1. Here, I present a new, multifunctional phylogenetics package, phytools, for the R statistical computing environment. 2. The focus of the package is on methods for phylogenetic comparative biology; however, it also includes tools for tree inference, phylogeny input/output, plotting, manipulation and several other tasks. 3. I describe and tabulate the major methods implemented in phytools, and in addition provide some demonstration of its use in the form of two illustrative examples. 4. Finally, I conclude by briefly describing an active web-log that I use to document present and future developments for phytools. I also note other web resources for phylogenetics in the R computational environment.

6,404 citations


"Climate, soil and plant functional ..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...We tested for phylogenetic signal (Pagel’s k) in the values of each of the four root traits (phylosig function in ‘PHYTOOLS’ package; Revell 2012)....

    [...]

  • ...We tested for phylogenetic signal (Pagel’s λ) in the values of each of the four root traits (phylosig function in ‘phytools’ package; Revell 2012)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
22 Apr 2004-Nature
TL;DR: Reliable quantification of the leaf economics spectrum and its interaction with climate will prove valuable for modelling nutrient fluxes and vegetation boundaries under changing land-use and climate.
Abstract: Bringing together leaf trait data spanning 2,548 species and 175 sites we describe, for the first time at global scale, a universal spectrum of leaf economics consisting of key chemical, structural and physiological properties. The spectrum runs from quick to slow return on investments of nutrients and dry mass in leaves, and operates largely independently of growth form, plant functional type or biome. Categories along the spectrum would, in general, describe leaf economic variation at the global scale better than plant functional types, because functional types overlap substantially in their leaf traits. Overall, modulation of leaf traits and trait relationships by climate is surprisingly modest, although some striking and significant patterns can be seen. Reliable quantification of the leaf economics spectrum and its interaction with climate will prove valuable for modelling nutrient fluxes and vegetation boundaries under changing land-use and climate.

6,360 citations


"Climate, soil and plant functional ..." refers background or result in this paper

  • ...Similar to previous above-ground observations, our results show high root trait variation at local scales among co-occurring species (Wright et al. 2004; Freschet et al. 2010) despite local environmental constraints....

    [...]

  • ...The role of these four traits in plant functioning and resource economics (sensu Wright et al. 2004) has been relatively well described....

    [...]

  • ...…that species with thin fine-roots and low tissue density as well as high fine-root N and SRL should generally be considered as having root strategies favouring faster return on investment, often associated with greater resource acquisition rates (sensu Eissenstat et al. 2000; Wright et al. 2004)....

    [...]

Related Papers (5)