Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review
TL;DR: High levels of evidence were found that AMs prevent lupus flares and increase long-term survival of patients with SLE; moderate evidence of protection against irreversible organ damage, thrombosis and bone mass loss and evidence supporting an effect on severe l upus activity, lipid levels and subclinical atherosclerosis was weak.
Abstract: Background: Antimalarial drugs (AM), chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), are frequently withdrawn in lupus patients with either severe or remitting disease. However, additional effects beyond immunomodulation have been recently described. Our aim was to analyse all the published evidence of the beneficial and adverse effects of AM therapy in SLE. Methods: Systematic review of the English literature between 1982-2007 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were selected. Case reports were excluded except for toxicity reports. The GRADE system was used to analyse the quality of the evidence. Results: 95 articles were included in the systematic review. We have found high evidence that AM prevent lupus flares and increase long-term survival of SLE patients; moderate evidence of protection against irreversible organ damage, thrombosis and bone mass loss .Toxicity related to AM is infrequent, mild and usually reversible, with HCQ having a safer profile. In pregnant women, we have found high evidence that AM, particularly HCQ, decrease lupus activity without harming the baby. On the other hand, evidence supporting an effect on severe lupus activity, lipid levels and subclinical atherosclerosis was weak. Individual papers suggest effects in preventing the evolution from SLE-like to full-blown SLE, influencing vitamin D levels and protecting lupus patients against cancer. Conclusion: Given the broad spectrum of beneficial effects and the safety profile, HCQ should be given to most patients with SLE during the whole course of the disease, irrespective of its severity, and be continued during pregnancy.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The management strategies discussed here apply to lupus nephritis in adults, particularly to those receiving care in the United States of America, and include interventions that were available in theUnited States as of April 2011.
Abstract: In the United States, approximately 35% of adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) have clinical evidence of nephritis at the time of diagnosis; with an estimated total of 50–60% developing nephritis during the first 10 years of disease [1–4]. The prevalence of nephritis is significantly higher in African Americans and Hispanics than in Caucasians, and is higher in men than in women. Renal damage is more likely to develop in non-Caucasian groups [2–4]. Overall survival in patients with SLE is approximately 95% at 5 years after diagnosis and 92% at 10 years [5, 6]. The presence of lupus nephritis significantly reduces survival, to approximately 88% at 10 years, with even lower survival in African Americans [5, 6].
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) last published guidelines for management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 1999 [7]. That publication was designed primarily for education of primary care physicians and recommended therapeutic and management approaches for many manifestations of SLE. Recommendations for management of lupus nephritis (LN) consisted of pulse glucocorticoids followed by high dose daily glucocorticoids in addition to an immunosuppressive medication, with cyclophosphamide viewed as the most effective immunosuppressive medication for diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis. Mycophenolate mofetil was not yet in use for lupus nephritis and was not mentioned. Since that time, many clinical trials of glucocorticoids-plus-immunosuppressive interventions have been published, some of which are high quality prospective trials, and some not only prospective but also randomized. Thus, the ACR determined that a new set of management recommendations was in order. A combination of extensive literature review and the opinions of highly qualified experts, including rheumatologists, nephrologists and pathologists, has been used to reach the recommendations. The management strategies discussed here apply to lupus nephritis in adults, particularly to those receiving care in the United States of America, and include interventions that were available in the United States as of April 2011.
While these recommendations were developed using rigorous methodology, guidelines do have inherent limitations in informing individual patient care; hence the selection of the term “recommendations.” While they should not supplant clinical judgment or limit clinical judgment, they do provide expert advice to the practicing physician managing patients with lupus nephritis.
1,128 citations
Cites background or result from "Clinical efficacy and side effects ..."
...In addition, HCQ treatment may reduce the risk of clotting events in SLE [17–20]....
[...]
...This opinion was based on a prospective controlled trial [17] showing flare rates of lupus are lower in SLE patients receiving HCQ compared to those in whom HCQ was replaced with a placebo, and on recent cross-sectional and prospective data [18, 19] showing significantly lower damage accrual, including renal damage, in SLE patients receiving HCQ compared to those without HCQ....
[...]
University of Perugia1, Dresden University of Technology2, Leiden University Medical Center3, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens4, University of Padua5, University of Birmingham6, University of Ferrara7, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc8, University of Cambridge9, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico10, University of Pisa11, University of Düsseldorf12, Medical University of Vienna13, Karolinska University Hospital14, Charles University in Prague15, University of Brescia16, Aarhus University Hospital17, University of Amsterdam18, University Hospital Bonn19
TL;DR: The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion, based on emerging new evidence.
Abstract: Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007-12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.
1,079 citations
TL;DR: The role of autophagy and its regulation in cancer cells continues to emerge, and studies aim to define optimal strategies to modulate Autophagy for therapeutic advantage.
Abstract: Autophagy is a homeostatic, catabolic degradation process whereby cellular proteins and organelles are engulfed into autophagosomes, digested in lysosomes and recycled to sustain cellular metabolism. Autophagy has dual roles in cancer, acting as both a tumor suppressor by preventing the accumulation of damaged proteins and organelles and as a mechanism of cell survival that can promote the growth of established tumors. Tumor cells activate autophagy in response to cellular stress including hypoxia and increased metabolic demands related to rapid cell proliferation. Autophagy-related stress tolerance can enable cell survival by maintaining energy production that can lead to tumor growth and therapeutic resistance, as shown in preclinical models where the inhibition of autophagy can restore chemosensitivity and enhance tumor cell death. These results established autophagy as a therapeutic target and have led to multiple early phase clinical trials in humans evaluating autophagy inhibition using hydroxychloroquine in combination with chemotherapy or targeted agents. Targeting autophagy in cancer provides new opportunities for drug development since more potent and specific inhibitors of autophagy are needed. The role of autophagy and its regulation in cancer cells continues to emerge and studies aim to define optimal strategies to modulate autophagy for therapeutic advantage.
1,061 citations
TL;DR: Mechanistic data give insights into the immunomodulatory potency of hydroxychloroquine and provide the rationale to search for more potent and/or selective inhibitors in antimalarial drugs.
Abstract: Despite widespread clinical use of antimalarial drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases, insights into the mechanism of action of these drugs are still emerging. Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are weak bases and have a characteristic ‘deep’ volume of distribution and a half-life of around 50 days. These drugs interfere with lysosomal activity and autophagy, interact with membrane stability and alter signalling pathways and transcriptional activity, which can result in inhibition of cytokine production and modulation of certain co-stimulatory molecules. These modes of action, together with the drug’s chemical properties, might explain the clinical efficacy and well-known adverse effects (such as retinopathy) of these drugs. The unknown dose–response relationships of these drugs and the lack of definitions of the minimum dose needed for clinical efficacy and what doses are toxic pose challenges to clinical practice. Further challenges include patient non-adherence and possible context-dependent variations in blood drug levels. Available mechanistic data give insights into the immunomodulatory potency of hydroxychloroquine and provide the rationale to search for more potent and/or selective inhibitors. Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are antimalarial drugs commonly used for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Multiple mechanisms might explain the efficacy and adverse effects of these drugs, but further investigation could lead to the development of more specific and potent drugs.
885 citations
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: This chapter discusses general principles in the management of glomerular disease, as well as methods for guideline development and examples of successful implementation of these principles.
Abstract: 142 Summary of Recommendation Statements 143 Chapter 1: Introduction 154 Chapter 2: General principles in the management of glomerular disease 156 Chapter 3: Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children 163 Chapter 4: Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children 172 Chapter 5: Minimal-change disease in adults 177 Chapter 6: Idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults 181 Chapter 7: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy 186 Chapter 8: Idiopathic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis 198 Chapter 9: Infection-related glomerulonephritis 200 Chapter 10: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy 209 Chapter 11: Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis 218 Chapter 12: Lupus nephritis 221 Chapter 13: Pauci-immune focal and segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis 233 Chapter 14: Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody glomerulonephritis 240 Methods for guideline development 243 Biographic and Disclosure Information 252
753 citations
Cites background from "Clinical efficacy and side effects ..."
...K There is low-quality evidence that hydroxychloroquine may protect against the onset of LN, against relapses of LN, ESRD, vascular thrombosis, and that it has a favorable impact on lipid profiles.(674)...
[...]
References
More filters
TL;DR: The authors discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies and shows that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates.
Abstract: : The results of observational studies are often disputed because of nonrandom treatment assignment. For example, patients at greater risk may be overrepresented in some treatment group. This paper discusses the central role of propensity scores and balancing scores in the analysis of observational studies. The propensity score is the (estimated) conditional probability of assignment to a particular treatment given a vector of observed covariates. Both large and small sample theory show that adjustment for the scalar propensity score is sufficient to remove bias due to all observed covariates. Applications include: matched sampling on the univariate propensity score which is equal percent bias reducing under more general conditions than required for discriminant matching, multivariate adjustment by subclassification on balancing scores where the same subclasses are used to estimate treatment effects for all outcome variables and in all subpopulations, and visual representation of multivariate adjustment by a two-dimensional plot. (Author)
23,744 citations
TL;DR: A system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts is developed, and a summary of the approach from the perspective of a guideline user is presented.
Abstract: Users of clinical practice guidelines and other recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the recommendations Systematic and explicit methods of making judgments can reduce errors and improve communication We have developed a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations that can be applied across a wide range of interventions and contexts In this article we present a summary of our approach from the perspective of a guideline user Judgments about the strength of a recommendation require consideration of the balance between benefits and harms, the quality of the evidence, translation of the evidence into specific circumstances, and the certainty of the baseline risk It is also important to consider costs (resource utilisation) before making a recommendation Inconsistencies among systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations reduce their potential to facilitate critical appraisal and improve communication of these judgments Our system for guiding these complex judgments balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues
7,608 citations
TL;DR: The clinical profile of patients with lupus and atherosclerosis suggests a role for disease-related factors in atherogenesis and underscores the need for trials of more focused and effective antiinflammatory therapy.
Abstract: Background Although systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with premature myocardial infarction, the prevalence of underlying atherosclerosis and its relation to traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease and lupus-related factors have not been examined in a case–control study. Methods In 197 patients with lupus and 197 matched controls, we performed carotid ultrasonography, echocardiography, and an assessment for risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The patients were also evaluated with respect to their clinical and serologic features, inflammatory mediators, and disease treatment. Results The risk factors for cardiovascular disease were similar among patients and controls. Atherosclerosis (carotid plaque) was more prevalent among patients than the controls (37.1 percent vs. 15.2 percent, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, only older age, the presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (odds ratio, 4.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 8.7), and a higher serum cholesterol level were ...
1,377 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assessed the frequency and characteristics of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during a 10-year period and compared the frequency of early manifestations with those that appeared later in the evolution of the disease.
1,151 citations
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: Most of the SLE inflammatory manifestations appear to be less common after a long-term evolution of the disease, probably reflecting the effect of therapy as well as the progressive remission of the Disease in many patients.
1,074 citations
"Clinical efficacy and side effects ..." refers background in this paper
...As a consequence, more than 50% of patients in many SLE cohorts have never been treated with AMs....
[...]