Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enabled by Complexity-Reduced Digital Transceivers
Summary (3 min read)
I. INTRODUCTION
- He standardized and commercially deployed optical access networks need to evolve facing the upcoming bandwidthhungry multimedia services with ultra-high definition video, business connectivity and mobile front-haul/back-haul (MFH/MBH) for 5G.
- The DSP plays the fundamental role of enhancing both the system capacity and the SE by transmitting advanced modulation formats, as well as compensating for all the distortions and transmission impairments that make impact on the signal from origin to destination.
- The authors explore photonic integration of low-cost DFBs with electro-absorption modulator (EAM), along with direct intensity-and-phase modulation leveraging the laser chirp, as a key technology to reduce the complexity and energy consumption of the coherent transmitter (TX).
- The udWDM-PON outperforms the present PON technologies achieving loss budget in excess of 30 dB, enabling a large number of users in a 6.25 to 25 GHz spaced optical grid for 1.25 to 20 Gb/s 𝜆-to-the-user access network, totally passive, transparent, and fully compatible with deployed legacy PON systems.
II. COHERENT TRANSCEIVERS TECHNOLOGY
- The actual commercially available CoTRXs are mainly intended for high capacity core networks supporting large volumes of data traffic.
- The Dual-EML is a monolithically integrated photonic device where the same active layer is composed by two sections, a DFB and an EAM.
- To further reduce the complexity and cost, the CoTRX should resort on the use of commercial low-cost lasers, such as DFBs with statistical (i.e. non-preselected) 𝜆.
- This is advantageous for network flexibility compared with analog systems that require HW changes.
- Some of the DSP algorithms of the conventional CoTRX in Fig. 2 are key functionalities to correctly generate and detect the modulated data, while others related to equalization and impairments mitigation play a secondary role in the access scenario with lower data rates, simpler modulation formats, and shorter fiber spans.
III. DSP SUBSYSTEMS OF THE TRANSMITTER
- Nevertheless, the EAM bias and the extinction ratio (ER) can be adjusted to operate in the linear region, and the NL pre-distortion by DSP might be optional or discarded.
- Therefore, the key DSP subsystems for the TX in Fig. 3 are: symbol mapping, pulse shaping and linear pre-emphasis.
A. Symbol Mapping
- In contrast, the Dual-EML in Fig. 3 , proposed as a cost-effective complex optical modulator, generates a circular constellation with polar coordinates 𝑟, 𝜙 by directly modulating the intensity with the EAM and the phase with the DFB laser chirp.
- Fig. 4 shows the constellation diagram for BPSK, quadrature PSK (QPSK) and 8-APSK, as well as the experimental constellations obtained from direct amplitude-and phase-modulation of the Dual-EML at 2.5 GBd.
- Considering the worst Rx sensitivity (-31.5 dBm for 8-PSK at 7.5 Gb/s), with a launched power of 0 dBm per user, a power loss budget >30 dB is achieved fulfilling the requirements of next generation access [1] .
- This technique can be directly extended for higher order modulation formats with more amplitude and phase levels, depending on the total laser.
- Δ𝜈 and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) constraints.
C. Linear Pre-Emphasis
- The simplified optical TX for PONs, that employs direct modulation of low-cost DFB, VCSEL or Dual-EML, might present severe BW limitation and non-flat frequency response.
- It presents some disadvantages since it might over-amplify the noise greatly in the spectral region where 𝐻(𝑓) is more attenuated.
- The parameter 𝜉 0 takes into account the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the signal, and the quantization noise variance of the DAC through the ENOB.
- In their previous work [25] , numerical simulation was carried out by employing 𝐿(𝑓) of Fig. 7 to determine the maximum transmission rate using a commercial DFB with direct phase modulation and DPE at the TX.
- Here, the authors extend the analysis to assess the impact of the quantization noise from the DAC on the DPE calculated through the MMSE and the ZF.
IV. DSP SUBSYSTEMS OF THE RECEIVER
- The DSP inherited from the coherent RX for core networks in Fig. 2 , can also be adapted and further simplified for the udWDM access scenario having different requirements and constraints, where the dominant transmission impairments mostly originate from the CoTRX photonic/electronic devices rather than the fiber channel.
- Also, the use of spectrally-efficient modulation formats contributes to further reduce the signal BW, thus minimizing the effect of CD and polarization mode dispersion (PMD), that have major impact when large signal BWs are transmitted over long fiber spans.
- Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
- Last, front-end correction and orthonormalization for imbalanced optical hybrids are more critical for dense QAM constellations that are not feasible for PONs.
- Therefore, the key DSP subsystems of the RX in Fig. 3 are: equalization for residual ISI, clock (CLK) recovery, and CR.
A. Clock Recovery
- In the coherent RX, ADCs might not operate at the same speed as the received data.
- Fig. 9 presents the block diagram of the CLK recovery algorithm that implements the power-based TED.
- Therefore, the ADCs operate at the symbol rate.
- The CLK recovery tolerance against CLK detuning between TX and RX was evaluated in the real-time experiment with the FPGA.
- The received optical power was set to -43 dBm, and the CLK frequency of the PPG was swept ±4 kHz with respect to 𝑅 𝐵 .
B. Carrier Recovery
- In DSP for optical coherent RXs, there exist numerous algorithms to correctly recover the transmitted constellation in presence of optical phase noise and frequency drifts from the TX and LO lasers.
- It was proposed in [14] as a simplified CR architecture that merges in a single algorithm the differential demodulation for phase recovery (PR), and the differential 𝑚th-power frequency estimation (FE), thus lowering the HW resources and process delay of the CR.
- Within the CR algorithm in Fig. 12 , digital samples of the received complex signal 𝐼[𝑛] + 𝑗𝑄[𝑛] for each SOP are first normalized by its complex modulus in order to demodulate the phase information only, for the case of modulations formats with multiple radii.
- As observed in Fig. 14 , without FE only ~50 MHz detuning are tolerated for less than 1 dB penalty, but raises up to ~400 MHz after FE, necessary to correct the 𝜆 drifts from DFBs due to temperature variations and laser aging.
- In all cases, experimental results are in reasonable agreement with numerical simulations, carried out under similar conditions.
V. CONCLUSION
- The authors carried out a comprehensive analysis of the key enabling technologies to make the coherent systems affordable in complexity and cost, suitable for optical access networks and other applications with high terminal density, where simple CoTRXs are required.
- The optical 𝑚-(A)PSK modulation is simplified by exploiting the photonic integration of DFB and EAM, enhancing the energy efficiency and lowering the footprint when compared to external 𝐼𝑄 modulators.
- The proposed CoTRX implements HW-efficient DSP, fundamental to overcome propagation impairments and increase the capacity and spectral efficiency of the PON.
- The achieved Rx sensitivities for all the modulation formats yield a power loss budget >30 dB, when 0 dBm launched power per user is considered.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
88 citations
11 citations
Cites background from "Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enable..."
...Furthermore, recently, to flexibly adapt to different bit rates with complexity-reduced coherent transceivers, transmissions up to 10 Gb/s by direct amplitude-and-phase modulation of a dual electro-absorption modulated laser (EML) have been shown [15,16] with different modulation formats and BWs....
[...]
...25 Gb/s to 10 Gb/s [15,16]....
[...]
...Additionally, superior bit rates per λ can also be achieved exploiting low-cost distributed feedback (DFB) lasers, photonic integration, simplified direct optical modulation, consumer electronics, and low-complexity digital signal processing (DSP) [15,16]....
[...]
5 citations
Cites background from "Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enable..."
...25 GBd and with 50% return-to-zero (RZ) pulse-shape for direct phase modulation through the laser chirp [6]....
[...]
...12 of [6]....
[...]
4 citations
1 citations
References
2,293 citations
"Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enable..." refers background in this paper
...This phenomena was early described in [19], [20], giving the expression for the optical frequency variation...
[...]
858 citations
"Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enable..." refers background in this paper
...determine early, ideal and late sampling instants [27]....
[...]
618 citations
"Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enable..." refers methods in this paper
...resampled to RS = 2B by a digital interpolator at the DSP [28]....
[...]
465 citations
"Coherent Ultra-Dense WDM-PON Enable..." refers background in this paper
...A recent alternative for CoTRXs is the Kramers-Kronig RX [12] that substantially reduces the RX front-end to a single PD per each state of polarization (SOP), but does not exhibit the high sensitivity and λ-selectivity of coherent systems....
[...]
435 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (18)
Q2. Why is differential phase detection a promising candidate?
The differential phase detection is a promising candidate due to its simplicity, robustness, high tolerance to the phase noise, and straightforward prototyping on the digital processor.
Q3. What is the common non-data aided TED method?
A common non-data aided TED is the Gardner method, that requires ×2 oversampling (i.e., two samples per symbol) to determine early, ideal and late sampling instants [27].
Q4. What is the way to reduce the noise in the TX?
For this purpose, the well-known zero-forcing (ZF) equalizer 𝑃(𝑓) = 𝐻−1(𝑓), being 𝐻(𝑓) the frequency response of the TX HW, could cancel all linear distortion and inter-symbol interference (ISI).
Q5. What is the way to optimize the sampling frequency of the optical hybrid?
front-end correction and orthonormalization for imbalanced optical hybrids are more critical for dense QAM constellations that are not feasible for PONs.
Q6. What is the way to demodulate the m-PSK data?
Note that 1.25 Gb/s, proposed for residential users in the udWDM-PON, is the most challenging scenario for the CR algorithm because 𝑅𝐵 is the closest to the total Δ𝜈, and therefore, the phase noise and the frequency drifts have stronger impact on the PSK data.
Q7. What is the main advantage of the digital CoTRX?
The digital CoTRX reconfigures easily dynamically adjusting its parameters such as modulation format and data BW, adapting to the type of service and user.
Q8. What is the effect of the linear DPE on the TX DSP?
The linear digital pre-emphasis (DPE) at the TX DSP jointly mitigates the BW limitation and flattens the frequency response of the laser, driver amplifier, and DAC.
Q9. What is the power loss budget for the CoTRX?
The achieved Rx sensitivities for all the modulation formats yield a power loss budget >30 dB, when 0 dBm launched power per user is considered.
Q10. What is the simplest way to reduce the cost of the CoTRX?
To further reduce the complexity and cost, the CoTRX should resort on the use of commercial low-cost lasers, such as DFBs with statistical (i.e. non-preselected) 𝜆.
Q11. What is the advantage of power-based TED?
This power-based TED is particularly attractive in the access scenario because the estimation of the timing error is purely based on the signal power, then immune to the phase noise and frequency drifts from DFBs.
Q12. What is the optimal sampling phase for the CLK recovery algorithm?
Within the CLK recovery algorithm, the timing error detector (TED) estimates the optimal sampling phase that minimizes the timing error 𝜀𝜏.
Q13. What is the ieee's definition of a CoTRX?
To correctly transport such high data rates with CoTRXs, information is mapped into advanced modulation formats with dense complex constellations that propagate through electronic and optical devices of the CoTRX, and through the transmission media, i.e., the optical fiber infrastructure.
Q14. What is the DSP of the CoTRX?
The DSP of the CoTRX can be implemented either in an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or in a fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA).
Q15. Why is the sensitivity of coherent RXs so low?
Owing to the superior sensitivity of coherent RXs, with -31.5 dBm as the worst case in Table I, the launched power per 𝜆 can be reduced below the threshold for NL impairments of the optical fiber [2], but still achieving the target loss budget >30 dB for a launched power of, e.g., 0 dBm per user or even lower.
Q16. What is the effect of the ZF on the RB of BPSK?
In their simulation, employing 𝐿(𝑓) of Fig. 7 with BW3dB = ~5 GHz, BPSK reached the highest 𝑅𝐵 (11 GBd) for 1 dB SNR penalty thus it is the most affected by low ENOB for the case of ZF compared with MMSE, because the ZF further enhances the quantization noise at the high frequencies beyond 5 GHz.
Q17. What is the power loss budget for 8-PSK?
Considering the worst Rx sensitivity (-31.5 dBm for 8-PSK at 7.5 Gb/s), with a launched power of 0 dBm per user, a power loss budget >30 dB is achieved fulfilling the requirements of next generation access [1].
Q18. What is the current status of the CoTRX?
during the last years efforts in research are being taken to develop CoTRXswith simplified architectures and HW efficient DSP [7][11].