Comparative Advertising in India: A Content Analysis of English Print Advertisements
TL;DR: The authors conducted a content analysis on 203 comparative print advertisements in India and found that direct comparative advertisements were used more (vis-a-vis indirect ones), differentiative claims are used more, maximal claims were higher than minimal claims, multibrand comparisons were greater in number, positive valence is preferred to negative valence, and underdog brands used more comparative advertisements than top-dog brands Contrary to expectations, hedonic and utilitarian products used comparative advertisements equally.
Abstract: We conducted a content analysis on 203 comparative print advertisements in India We found that as hypothesized, direct comparative advertisements were used more (vis-a-vis indirect ones), differentiative claims were used more (vis-a-vis associative ones), maximal claims were higher than minimal claims, multibrand comparisons were greater in number (vis-a-vis single-brand comparisons), positive valence is preferred to negative valence, and underdog brands used more comparative advertisements than top-dog brands Contrary to expectations, we found that hedonic and utilitarian products used comparative advertisements equally We offer a snapshot of the state of comparative advertisements in India that would be useful to managers and researchers
...read more
Citations
21 citations
18 citations
Cites background from "Comparative Advertising in India: A..."
...These include studies on media portrayals of older adults (Raman, Harwood, Weis, Anderson, & Miller, 2008), comparative advertising (Kalro et al., 2010), consumer promotions (Joseph & Sivakumaran, 2011) and gender portrayal (Das, 2011)....
[...]
12 citations
Cites background or result from "Comparative Advertising in India: A..."
...Whether new or established, most underdog brands prefer to use comparative advertising (Hoch and Deighton, 1989; Kalro et al., 2010), as most underdog brands are not as well-known as top-dog ones (Hoch and Deighton, 1989)....
[...]
...Kalro et al. (2010) however reveal in their content analysis that comparative advertising is used equally for both utilitarian and hedonic products....
[...]
...Consistent with this report, Kalro et al. (2010) find that 68 per cent of all comparative ads in India are direct, whereas 32 per cent are indirect....
[...]
...According to Kalro et al. (2010), a possible use for the wide prevalence of “multi-brand” comparisons could be fragmented product markets....
[...]
...First, most prior research in this genre has focused on market leader comparisons alone (Ang and Leong, 1994; Chattopadhyay, 1998; Gorn and Weinberg, 1984; Gotlieb and Sarel, 1991, 1992; Pechmann and Stewart, 1990, 1991), while ignoring multi-brand comparisons, when market reality shows that multi-brand comparisons are the norm, rather than an exception (Kalro et al., 2010)....
[...]
11 citations
11 citations
References
7,166 citations
"Comparative Advertising in India: A..." refers background in this paper
...…fact that comparing tangible features (of utilitarian products) rather than symbolic elements (of hedonic products) encourages “a person’s careful and thoughtful consideration of the true merits of the information presented in support of an advocacy (central route)” (Petty and Cacioppo 1986, 125)....
[...]
...The greater the argument quality of the message used, the greater will be the consumers’ tendency to use the central route of persuasion (Dröge 1989; Petty and Cacioppo 1986; Priester et al. 2004)....
[...]
4,469 citations
2,128 citations
"Comparative Advertising in India: A..." refers methods in this paper
...Interjudge reliability was measured for every dimension, and it was found to be high, exceeding the satisfactory reliability level of 85% specified by Kassarjian (1977) (table 1)....
[...]
1,967 citations
"Comparative Advertising in India: A..." refers background in this paper
...Park, Jaworski, and MacInnis (1986) and Bhat and Reddy (1998) suggest that consumers see a brand’s functionality and symbolism as separate phenomena....
[...]
1,836 citations
"Comparative Advertising in India: A..." refers background in this paper
...Batra and Ahtola (1990) stated, “Consumers purchase goods and services and perform consumption behaviors for two basic reasons: consummatory affective (hedonic) gratification and/or instrumental, utilitarian reasons.”...
[...]