Comparison of filler percolation and mechanical properties in graphene and carbon nanotubes filled epoxy nanocomposites
Citations
1,097 citations
610 citations
418 citations
355 citations
280 citations
References
3,727 citations
"Comparison of filler percolation an..." refers background in this paper
...Moreover, the macroscopic electrical behavior of the material is also influenced by tunneling conduction mechanisms and interparticle connections [35] which are less effective in the case of FGS....
[...]
3,245 citations
"Comparison of filler percolation an..." refers background in this paper
...This fact can be attributed to both effects, the functionalization and the planar geometry, predominantly to its morphology because the small thickness of the sheets with a much wrinkled topology at the nanoscale results in a better mechanical interlocking with the polymer chains and a more impeded crack propagation [40]....
[...]
2,367 citations
"Comparison of filler percolation an..." refers background or methods in this paper
...FGS nanocomposites shows the most outstanding mechanical performance as previously reported [10,11]....
[...]
...Meanwhile, graphene sheets nanocomposites show a better mechanical performance [10,11] which is attributed to the large specific area and planar geometry of the graphene and/or to a better mechanical interlocking of the nanofiller/matrix interface....
[...]
1,836 citations
1,455 citations
"Comparison of filler percolation an..." refers background in this paper
...The explanation to this stiffening effect without reducing the strength of the material is attributed to an appropriate impregnation with the matrix and good adhesion at the filler/matrix interphase [36]....
[...]