scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal Article

Complementary therapies and the NMC.

01 May 2010-The practising midwife (Pract Midwife)-Vol. 13, Iss: 5, pp 4-5
About: This article is published in The practising midwife.The article was published on 2010-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 2 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Prenatal care & Holistic health.
More filters
16 Dec 2016
TL;DR: This research outlines midwives’ approaches to SPL as a result of a complex and dynamic system, including an Italian alongside- and an English freestanding- midwifery units, in both an English and an Italian context.
Abstract: Background: Slow progress of labour (SPL) occurs in 3-37% of all labours. It constitutes the main cause of primary caesarean section (CS) and is associated with operative births, maternal and foetal morbidity, and a negative birthing experience. SPL is also the principal reason for the transfers of women from midwife-led units (MLUs) or their home, to hospitals. The current standard medical management of SPL, including intravenous administration of synthetic oxytocin and artificial rupture of membranes (ARM), has been increasingly questioned and the need for alternatives recommended. A midwifery approach to SPL represents a possible important alternative. However, contemporary literature shows a surprising dearth of research concerning midwives’ approaches to SPL. Birth centres appear ideal settings for exploring a midwifery approach to SPL, given the strong midwifery philosophy and the relevance of SPL reported in these contexts. Aim: To explore midwives’ approaches to SPL in birth centres, focusing in particular on midwives’ understanding of the phenomenon, diagnostic process, clinical management and decision-making. Methods: A qualitative multiple case study, underpinned by a critical realist perspective. Midwives’ approaches to SPL represented the ‘case’ of interest; an Italian alongside- (AMU) and an English freestanding- (FMU) midwifery units were purposively selected as case-sites. Data was collected between November 2012 and July 2013, after obtaining all necessary ethical approvals. An inductive reasoning, and triangulation logic characterised data collection. Multiple methods were adopted including individual semi-structured interviews, focus groups, observations and document reviews. Practising midwives, midwife managers and two lead obstetricians were included as participants after obtaining written informed consent. Data was analysed at two levels, within-case and cross-case, using a thematic analysis. Findings from the cross-case analysis supported the development of assertions and final conceptualisation regarding midwives’ approaches to SPL in birth centres. Findings: At the Italian site, midwives identified SPL as the problem of their care in the AMU. They perceived the process of recognition of this phenomenon as an engaging challenge and attempted to untangle the main cause amongst the many intertwined ones, in order to tailor their approach. Dealing with SPL represented a struggle; midwives adopted several different interventions and their decisions appeared enabled or constrained by numerous factors, especially the problematic relationship with the hospital staff. At the English site, SPL was not considered an issue, midwives were keen in looking at diagnostic and causal factors of SPL within a bigger picture. Midwives’ interventions aimed at giving women the best chance to overcome SPL and give birth in the FMU. The several influential factors were managed by many midwives through experience. Across cases, midwives’ understanding of SPL varied. SPL was acknowledged to result from a complex interaction of causes. Early labour was considered a critical stage for the development of SPL. The process of recognition of SPL appeared a dynamic one and aimed at reaching an objective diagnosis. Distinguishing whether SPL represented a physiological rest or arrest of labour progress represented an emerging dilemma. Midwives tailored interventions to single situations. Some interventions appeared to be fundamental to midwifery care, whilst others depended on various factors. Midwives’ relationships with all factors in the context appeared to be pivotal for both performing interventions and decision-making. Conclusion: This is the first case study exploring midwives’ approaches to SPL in birth centres, in both an English and an Italian context. This research outlines midwives’ approaches to SPL as a result of a complex and dynamic system. Midwives’ understanding, identification, clinical management of SPL and decision-making represents a multifaceted and stratified reality. The individual characteristics of the women, the birth attendants, the midwife, and colleagues, as well as the relationships occurring in this context, represent the main factors whose variable interactions may result in variable manifestations of the midwifery approach. On the basis of the findings of this research, recommendations are made for midwifery practice, education and research.

15 citations

Cites background or methods from "Complementary therapies and the NMC..."

  • ..., 2010), and increased autonomy for women and midwives (Adams, 2006; Mitchell et al., 2006; Tiran, 2010; Hall et al., 2011)....


  • ...This resonates with the midwifery model of care (Mitchell et al., 2006; Williams and Mitchell, 2007; Shuval and Gross, 2008; Samuels et al., 2010), and increased autonomy for women and midwives (Adams, 2006; Mitchell et al., 2006; Tiran, 2010; Hall et al., 2011)....


Journal ArticleDOI
09 Feb 2021
TL;DR: A systematic, integrative review of the evidence base for the use of raspberry leaf in pregnancy is presented in this article, with the aim of identifying evidence base on the biophysical effects, safety and efficacy of Raspberry Leaf in pregnancy.
Abstract: Childbearing women have been using various herbs to assist with pregnancy, labour and birth for centuries One of the most common is raspberry leaf The evidence base for the use of raspberry leaf is however under-developed It is incumbent on midwives and other maternity care providers to provide women with evidence-based information so they can make informed choices The aim of this study was to review the research literature to identify the evidence base on the biophysical effects, safety and efficacy of raspberry leaf in pregnancy A systematic, integrative review was undertaken Six databases were searched to identify empirical research papers published in peer reviewed journals including in vitro, in vivo, human and animal studies The search included the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection and AMED Identified studies were appraised independently by two reviewers using the MMAT appraisal instrument An integrative approach was taken to analysis Thirteen studies were included Five were laboratory studies using animal and human tissue, two were experiments using animals, and six were human studies Included studies were published between 1941 and 2016 Raspberry leaf has been shown to have biophysical effects on animal and human smooth muscle including the uterus Toxity was demonstrated when high doses were administered intravenously or intaperitoneally in animal studies Human studies have not shown any harm or benefit though one study demonstrated a clinically meaningful (though non-statistically significant) reduction in length of second stage and augmentation of labour in women taking raspberry leaf Many women use raspberry leaf in pregnancy to facilitate labour and birth The evidence base supporting the use of raspeberry leaf in pregnancy is weak and further research is needed to address the question of raspberry leaf’s effectiveness

8 citations