Posted Content•
Completing the puzzle: why studies in non-human primates are needed to better understand the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
TL;DR: In this article, non-human primate (NHP) models of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are used to investigate the complex, dynamic effects of brain stimulation across multiple hierarchically interconnected brain areas, networks, and effectors.
Abstract: Brain stimulation is a core method in neuroscience. Numerous non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are currently in use in basic and clinical research, and recent advances promise the ability to non-invasively access deep brain structures. While encouraging, there is a surprising gap in our understanding of precisely how NIBS perturbs neural activity throughout an interconnected network, and how such perturbed neural activity ultimately links to behaviour. In this review, we will consider why non-human primate (NHP) models of NIBS are ideally situated to address this gap in knowledge, and will consider why the oculomotor network that moves our line of sight offers a particularly valuable platform in which to empirically test hypothesis regarding NIBS-induced changes in brain and behaviour. NHP models of NIBS will enable investigation of the complex, dynamic effects of brain stimulation across multiple hierarchically interconnected brain areas, networks, and effectors. By establishing such links between brain and behavioural output, work in NHPs can help optimize experimental and therapeutic approaches, improve NIBS efficacy, and reduce side-effects of NIBS.
References
More filters
3,880 citations
TL;DR: A research strategy to achieve the connection matrix of the human brain (the human “connectome”) is proposed, and its potential impact is discussed.
Abstract: The connection matrix of the human brain (the human “connectome”) represents an indispensable foundation for basic and applied neurobiological research. However, the network of anatomical connections linking the neuronal elements of the human brain is still largely unknown. While some databases or collations of large-scale anatomical connection patterns exist for other mammalian species, there is currently no connection matrix of the human brain, nor is there a coordinated research effort to collect, archive, and disseminate this important information. We propose a research strategy to achieve this goal, and discuss its potential impact.
2,908 citations
TL;DR: Spread of excitation, which may be a warning sign for seizures, occurred in one subject and was not accompanied by increased MEP amplitude, suggesting that spread ofexcitation and amplitude changes are different phenomena and also indicating the need for adequate monitoring even with stimulations at low frequencies.
Abstract: We studied the effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on motor cortex excitability in humans. TMS at 0.1 Hz for 1 hour did not change cortical excitability. Stimulation at 0.9 Hz for 15 minutes (810 pulses), similar to the parameters used to induce long-term depression (LTD) in cortical slice preparations and in vivo animal studies, led to a mean decrease in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of 19.5%. The decrease in cortical excitability lasted for at least 15 minutes after the end of the 0.9 Hz stimulation. The mechanism underlying this decrease in excitability may be similar to LTD. TMS-induced reduction of cortical excitability has potential clinical applications in diseases such as epilepsy and myoclonus. Spread of excitation, which may be a warning sign for seizures, occurred in one subject and was not accompanied by increased MEP amplitude, suggesting that spread of excitation and amplitude changes are different phenomena and also indicating the need for adequate monitoring even with stimulations at low frequencies.
2,013 citations
The Catholic University of America1, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital2, University of Toronto3, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health4, Università Campus Bio-Medico5, University of Eastern Finland6, Monash University7, Medical University of South Carolina8, Paris 12 Val de Marne University9, University of Regensburg10, University of Brescia11, University of Göttingen12, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center13, University of Siena14, University College London15, Copenhagen University Hospital16, Fukushima Medical University17, University of Tübingen18
TL;DR: These guidelines provide an up-date of previous IFCN report on “Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application” and include some recent extensions and developments.
1,850 citations
Paris 12 Val de Marne University1, French Institute of Health and Medical Research2, University of Göttingen3, Ghent University4, University Hospital of Lausanne5, University of Lisbon6, university of lille7, Università Campus Bio-Medico8, University of Belgrade9, University of Hamburg10, Turku University Hospital11, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki12, University of Regensburg13, University of Bern14, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich15, University of Siena16, The Catholic University of America17, University College London18, University of Ulm19, Copenhagen University Hospital20, University of Oxford21, University of Barcelona22, University of Tübingen23
TL;DR: There is a sufficient body of evidence to accept with level A (definite efficacy) the analgesic effect of high-frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the pain and the antidepressant effect of HF-rT MS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
1,554 citations