Concurrent sponsorship: implications for sponsoring brands and sponsored property
Citations
70 citations
33 citations
24 citations
15 citations
12 citations
References
76,383 citations
56,555 citations
"Concurrent sponsorship: implication..." refers background or methods in this paper
...The values for composite reliability for all constructs exceed the threshold value of 0.70 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981)....
[...]
...For the purpose of examining discriminant validity, AVE is compared with the squared correlation between a pair of constructs as suggested by Fornell and Larcker (1981)....
[...]
...Discriminant validity was checked using Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) criterion, and all average variance extracted (AVE) values for each construct were found to be larger than the squared correlation of that construct with others....
[...]
52,531 citations
42,102 citations
"Concurrent sponsorship: implication..." refers methods in this paper
...In analyzing the model, we used the adjustment index and the significance of the regression coefficients, as suggested by Kline (2011). Once this procedure was complete, we used Amos 20....
[...]
34,720 citations
"Concurrent sponsorship: implication..." refers methods in this paper
...Data analysis was conducted though a two-step procedure recommended by Anderson and Gerbing (1988) using AMOS 21....
[...]
...Data analysis was conducted though a two-step procedure recommended by Anderson and Gerbing (1988) using AMOS 21. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the factor structure of the second-order construct of cosmopolitanism. This measurement model was used to test construct reliability and validity. Structural paths were tested using structural model with 5,000 bootstrap resamples and 90% confidence intervals (CIs). Multigroup analysis was used to test the equivalence of the model across the global brands from developed and emerging markets. Mediation hypothesis was tested following the method suggested by Preacher and Hayes (2008)....
[...]