scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Congruency effects on the basis of instructed response-effect contingencies

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The results indicate that instruction-based congruency effects are not restricted to instructed S-R mappings and suggest that the representations that mediate these effects do not specify the nature of the relation between response and effect even though this relation was explicitly specified by the instructions.
About
This article is published in Acta Psychologica.The article was published on 2015-06-01 and is currently open access. It has received 13 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Task (project management).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Powerful Instructions: Automaticity Without Practice:

TL;DR: This paper found that newly instructed learners are more likely to follow hardwired tendencies or the outcome of prior practice than those who were instructed by hardwired individuals. But, they also found that the automatic effects of instruction (AEIs) did not reflect hardwired tendency or prior practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

There is more into 'doing' than 'knowing': The function of the right inferior frontal sulcus is specific for implementing versus memorising verbal instructions.

TL;DR: The results indicate that a region within the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in the vicinity of the inferior frontal sulcus (IFS) is specifically recruited when new instructions are implemented compared to when new Instructions are memorised.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automatic effects of instructions do not require the intention to execute these instructions

TL;DR: This article showed that maintaining instructed stimulus-response mappings for future recognition, rather than for future execution, can also lead to an instruction-based congruency effect, even when it is very unlikely that participants form the intention to execute instructions.
Journal ArticleDOI

There are limits to the effects of task instructions: Making the automatic effects of task instructions context-specific takes practice.

TL;DR: It is suggested that instructions can establish stimulus-response representations that have a reflexive impact on behavior but are insensitive to the context in which the task is known to be valid, Instead, context-specific task representations seem to require practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of motor imagery in learning via instructions

TL;DR: It is proposed that motor imagery also leads to a shift in processing mode and to the formation of a pragmatic task representation, albeit a less detailed one as compared to the representation that is formed on the basis of physical practice.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Control of impulsive emotional behaviour through implementation intentions.

TL;DR: Results showed that merely intending to approach and avoid affective stimuli influenced emotional action tendencies in a modified affective Simon task in which affective valence was irrelevant.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automatic motor activation by mere instruction

TL;DR: The results strongly suggest that, like experienced S–R mappings, instructed S– R mappings can lead to automatic response activation, but possibly via a different route.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving performance through implementation intentions: Are preexisting response biases replaced?

TL;DR: Results of two experiments show that an implementation-intention strategy provides a specific performance benefit that is in addition to, but not in place of, preexisting response biases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction

TL;DR: The present study demonstrates that the Simon effect is eliminated even after presenting only the instructions of an incompatible position task, without participants having the opportunity to practice that task, and suggests that stimulus-response associations formed on the basis of instructions can counteract effects of long-term stimulus- response associations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Automaticity without extensive training: the role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules.

TL;DR: The present study demonstrated that active maintenance of task rules is not necessary for their automatic implementation, and the results are consistent with the memory view of automaticity, according to which task-defined S-R rules are implemented via automatic retrieval of S–R episodes.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

The present study investigated whether instruction-based congruency effects are also observed for a different type of instructions than instructed S-R mappings, namely instructed response-effect contingencies. The present study aims to make a first step in this direction by investigating to which extent instruction-based congruency effects can be obtained on the basis of instructions specifying the contingency between a particular response and the effect it elicits in the environment ( i. e. Response-Effect or R-E contingencies ). Of interest for the present purpose is a study of Hommel, Alfonso, and Fuentes ( 2003 ), which observed that action effects can generalize over words sharing semantic features. The present study offers a more stringent test of the question whether instruction-based congruency effects can be obtained on the basis of instructed R-E contingencies. On the other hand, their results suggest that the representations that mediate these effects do not specify the nature of the relation between response and effect even though this relation was explicitly specified by the instructions. Liefooghe et al. ( 2012, see also Meiran et al., 2012 ; Wenke et al., 2007 ) suggested that instructionbased congruency effects indicate that instructed S-R mappings are transformed into procedural associations during task preparation, which automatically trigger response activations when being irrelevant ( see, Everaert et al. This finding suggests that a congruency effect based on R-E contingencies can be obtained with stimuli that never co-occurred with a particular response in the acquisition phase, but that resemble stimuli that were part of a previously learned R-E contingency. Based on the proposal of Hommel ( 2009 ), the observation of an instructionInstruction-Based Response-Effect Congruency 7 based congruency effect on the basis of instructed R-E contingencies may suggest that while the associations formed on the basis of instructions do include stimulus and response codes, they do not include a qualification of the particular relation between these codes ( i. e., a particular effect is contingent upon a particular response ), even though such relation is explicitly specified by the instructions. 

It becomes clear that future research on instruction implementation, will also need to focus on the communalities and differences between the types of instructions that are implemented. Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects. 

Trending Questions (3)
What are the effects of congruent instructions on behavior change?

The effects of congruent instructions on behavior change are investigated in the paper.

How do congruent instructions affect the process of behavior change?

The provided paper does not directly address how congruent instructions affect the process of behavior change. The paper focuses on instruction-based congruency effects in a diagnostic task based on instructed response-effect contingencies.

Are congruent instructions necessary for effective behavior change?

The provided paper does not directly address the question of whether congruent instructions are necessary for effective behavior change.