Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
Don Husereau,Don Husereau,Michael Drummond,Stavros Petrou,Christopher I. Carswell,David Moher,Dan Greenberg,Dan Greenberg,Federico Augustovski,Andrew Briggs,Josephine Mauskopf,Elizabeth Loder +11 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines into one current, useful reporting guidance and it is hoped that this guidance will lead to more consistent and transparent reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions.About:
This article is published in Value in Health.The article was published on 2013-03-01 and is currently open access. It has received 1563 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Economic evaluation.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Gillian D Sanders,Peter J. Neumann,Anirban Basu,Dan W. Brock,David Feeny,Murray Krahn,Karen M. Kuntz,David O. Meltzer,Douglas K Owens,Lisa A. Prosser,Joshua A. Salomon,Mark Sculpher,Thomas A Trikalinos,Louise B. Russell,Joanna E. Siegel,Theodore G. Ganiats +15 more
TL;DR: The Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine reviewed the current status of the field of cost-effectiveness analysis and developed a new set of recommendations, including the recommendation to perform analyses from 2 reference case perspectives and to provide an impact inventory to clarify included consequences.
Journal ArticleDOI
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Don Husereau,Michael Drummond,Stavros Petrou,Christopher I. Carswell,David Moher,Dan Greenberg,Federico Augustovski,Andrew Briggs,Josephine Mauskopf,Elizabeth Loder +9 more
TL;DR: The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement as mentioned in this paper is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement
Don Husereau,Don Husereau,Michael Drummond,Stavros Petrou,Christopher I. Carswell,David Moher,Dan Greenberg,Dan Greenberg,Federico Augustovski,Andrew Briggs,Josephine Mauskopf,Elizabeth Loder +11 more
TL;DR: The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement.
Gretchen A Stevens,Leontine Alkema,Robert E. Black,J. Ties Boerma,Gary S. Collins,Majid Ezzati,John Grove,Daniel R Hogan,Margaret C. Hogan,Richard Horton,Joy E Lawn,Ana Marušić,Colin Mathers,Christopher J L Murray,Igor Rudan,Joshua A. Salomon,Paul J. Simpson,Theo Vos,Vivian Welch +18 more
TL;DR: The Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) define best reporting practices for studies that calculate health estimates for multiple populations (in time or space) using multiple information sources.
Journal ArticleDOI
Budget Impact Analysis—Principles of Good Practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force
Sean D. Sullivan,Josephine Mauskopf,Federico Augustovski,J. Jaime Caro,Karen M. Lee,Mark Minchin,Ewa Orlewska,Pete Penna,José Manuel Rodríguez Barrios,Wen Yi Shau +9 more
TL;DR: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Health Sciences Policy Council (ISOP) Task Force on Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) as mentioned in this paper has recommended that the design of a BIA for a new health care intervention should take into account relevant features of the health care system, possible access restrictions, the anticipated uptake of the new intervention and the use and effects of the current and new interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
TL;DR: The Consort 2010 Statement as discussed by the authors has been used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials and has been updated by Schulz et al. in 2010, based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
E von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The STROBE Statement is a checklist of items that should be addressed in articles reporting on the 3 main study designs of analytical epidemiology: cohort, casecontrol, and cross-sectional studies; these recommendations are not prescriptions for designing or conducting studies.