scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Correlates of physical activity in a sample of older adults with type 2 diabetes.

01 May 1999-Diabetes Care (American Diabetes Association)-Vol. 22, Iss: 5, pp 706-712
TL;DR: Assessing physical activity behavior and its correlates in older adults with type 2 diabetes found the low prevalence of physical activity found in this and other studies should raise concerns among clinicians.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Physical activity is integral to the management of type 2 diabetes. Unfortunately, the majority of adults with type 2 diabetes do not regularly engage in physical activity. The purpose of this study was to assess physical activity behavior and its correlates (i.e., physical activity knowledge, barriers, and performance and outcome expectations) in older adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A subgroup of 260 adults with type 2 diabetes was identified from a larger stratified random sample of adults aged > or = 55 years. Participants completed an interviewer-administered survey designed from focus group findings and social learning theory. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents (54.6%) reported 0 min of weekly physical activity. This was especially true of older female respondents. Performance expectation scores were lower among respondents who were in the oldest age-group, namely, white women. Physical activity knowledge varied by age-group, and barriers to physical activity were prevalent in all groups. The following are significant correlates of reported weekly physical activity: younger age, more education, fewer motivational barriers, and greater perceived health and performance expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of physical activity to diabetes management, the low prevalence of physical activity found in this and other studies should raise concerns among clinicians. Future research to identify predictors of physical activity is needed to guide clinicians in the promotion of physical activity.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The conceptual distinctions between the terms sedentarism, physical inactivity, physical activity and energy expenditure are clarified and the utility of different approaches for quantifying and expressing physical activity in typically sedentary populations are reviewed.
Abstract: Increasing the physical activity of typically sedentary adult populations is at the forefront of the public health agenda. This review addresses the challenges in defining and measuring physical activity in this target group, for a number of purposes, namely, scientific or academic inquiry, surveillance, clinical application and programme evaluation. First, we clarify the conceptual distinctions between the terms sedentarism, physical inactivity, physical activity and energy expenditure. Next, we review and compare the utility of different approaches for quantifying and expressing physical activity in these populations. Physical activity in typically sedentary populations is most likely a simple pattern of behaviour that has been largely obscured by existing measures and its expression as energy expenditure. Existing self-report methods are practical, but suffer from floor effects and recall bias. Walking, the most important activity to assess in this target group, is very difficult to measure through self-report methods. Motion sensors are more appropriate for quantifying physical activity behaviours in typically sedentary populations. Of the 2 types of motion sensors — the accelerometer and the pedometers — the latter is more appealing because it is both an affordable and a ‘good enough’ measure of physical activity, specifically ambulatory activity. Although a common measurement approach would greatly facilitate our understanding of physical activity behaviour patterns, the selection of an approach ultimately depends on the purpose of the study and to a great extent, its budget. Researchers, clinicians and practitioners interested in accurately capturing the lower end of the continuum of physical activity (that is characteristic of sedentary populations) must thoughtfully consider the relative advantages and disadvantages of the available approaches.

537 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that further attention should be directed toward individualized tailoring of programs that recognize unique barriers in older adults such as intermittent illness and the burden of caregiving.

405 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the prevalence of physical activity among adults with and at risk for Type 2 diabetes was found to be high in the U.S., and the strongest correlates of being physically active were income level, limitations in physical function, depression, and severe obesity.
Abstract: Objective Given the risk of obesity and diabetes in the U.S., and clear benefit of exercise in disease prevention and management, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of physical activity among adults with and at risk for diabetes. Research design and methods The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is a nationally representative survey of the U.S. population. In the 2003 survey, 23,283 adults responded when asked about whether they were physically active (moderate or vigorous activity, > or =30 min, three times per week). Information on sociodemographic characteristics and health conditions were self-reported. Additional type 2 diabetes risk factors examined were age > or =45 years, non-Caucasian ethnicity, BMI > or =25 kg/m(2), hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Results A total of 39% of adults with diabetes were physically active versus 58% of adults without diabetes. The proportion of active adults without diabetes declined as the number of risk factors increased until dropping to similar rates as people with diabetes. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical factors, the strongest correlates of being physically active were income level, limitations in physical function, depression, and severe obesity (BMI > or =40 kg/m(2)). Several traditional predictors of activity (sex, education level, and having received past advice from a health professional to exercise more) were not evident among respondents with diabetes. Conclusions The majority of patients with diabetes or at highest risk for developing type 2 diabetes do not engage in regular physical activity, with a rate significantly below national norms. There is a great need for efforts to target interventions to increase physical activity in these individuals.

381 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The FSP is a practical intervention that elicits an immediate and profound change in walking behaviour that is an important ‘first step’ towards increasing the volume and/or intensity of PA necessary to improve long-term health outcomes in this largely sedentary and overweight or obese population.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To conduct a randomised trial of a physical activity (PA) intervention, The First Step Program (FSP) for adults with type II diabetes. DESIGN: A 16-week intervention study and 24-week follow-up assessment. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 47 overweight/obese, sedentary individuals (age=52.7±5.2 y; BMI=33.3±5.6 kg/m2) recruited through a diabetes education centre. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: daily PA assessed by pedometer (steps/day). Secondary outcomes: anthropometric measures (weight, BMI, waist girth, hip girth); indicators of cardiovascular health (resting heart rate and blood pressure); glycemic control (fasting glucose, insulin, HbA1c, glucose concentration 120 min postglucose load); plasma lipid status (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides). RESULTS: Relative to the CONTROL group, FSP participants increased their PA >3000 steps/day (approximately 30 min/day) during the intervention (P<0.0001). Waist and hip girth decreased (approximately 2–3 cm), but did not differ significantly between groups. Significant changes did not emerge for any of the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: The FSP is a practical intervention that elicits an immediate and profound change in walking behaviour. Such change is an important ‘first step’ towards increasing the volume and/or intensity of PA necessary to improve long-term health outcomes in this largely sedentary and overweight or obese population. Relapse by 24 weeks indicates that other strategies such as booster sessions are needed to maintain lifestyle change. Further research must determine realistic and responsive health outcomes for this population that are achievable through practical, real-world programming.

342 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is substantial evidence that the p38gamma MAPK-PGC-1alpha regulatory axis is critical for exercise-induced metabolic adaptations in skeletal muscle, and strategies that upregulate PGC-1 alpha, within physiological limits, have revealed its insulin-sensitizing effects.
Abstract: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) is a major regulator of exercise-induced phenotypic adaptation and substrate utilization. We provide an overview of ...

319 citations

Related Papers (5)