scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Council on cardiovascular and stroke nursing.

About: This article is published in Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.The article was published on 2013-03-01. It has received 272 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: MEDLINE & Quality of life (healthcare).
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This year's edition of the Statistical Update includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, metrics to assess and monitor healthy diets, an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, a focus on the global burden of cardiovascular disease, and further evidence-based approaches to changing behaviors, implementation strategies, and implications of the American Heart Association’s 2020 Impact Goals.
Abstract: Background: The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports on the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovas...

5,078 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Almost 1.6% of adults with COVID-19 who visited the emergency department or were hospitalized experienced ischemic stroke, a higher rate of stroke compared with a cohort of patients with influenza, and the association persisted across sensitivity analyses adjusting for vascular risk factors, viral symptomatology, and intensive care unit admission.
Abstract: Importance It is uncertain whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke than would be expected from a viral respiratory infection Objective To compare the rate of ischemic stroke between patients with COVID-19 and patients with influenza, a respiratory viral illness previously associated with stroke Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 academic hospitals in New York City, New York, and included adult patients with emergency department visits or hospitalizations with COVID-19 from March 4, 2020, through May 2, 2020 The comparison cohort included adults with emergency department visits or hospitalizations with influenza A/B from January 1, 2016, through May 31, 2018 (spanning moderate and severe influenza seasons) Exposures COVID-19 infection confirmed by evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in the nasopharynx by polymerase chain reaction and laboratory-confirmed influenza A/B Main Outcomes and Measures A panel of neurologists adjudicated the primary outcome of acute ischemic stroke and its clinical characteristics, mechanisms, and outcomes We used logistic regression to compare the proportion of patients with COVID-19 with ischemic stroke vs the proportion among patients with influenza Results Among 1916 patients with emergency department visits or hospitalizations with COVID-19, 31 (16%; 95% CI, 11%-23%) had an acute ischemic stroke The median age of patients with stroke was 69 years (interquartile range, 66-78 years); 18 (58%) were men Stroke was the reason for hospital presentation in 8 cases (26%) In comparison, 3 of 1486 patients with influenza (02%; 95% CI, 00%-06%) had an acute ischemic stroke After adjustment for age, sex, and race, the likelihood of stroke was higher with COVID-19 infection than with influenza infection (odds ratio, 76; 95% CI, 23-252) The association persisted across sensitivity analyses adjusting for vascular risk factors, viral symptomatology, and intensive care unit admission Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study from 2 New York City academic hospitals, approximately 16% of adults with COVID-19 who visited the emergency department or were hospitalized experienced ischemic stroke, a higher rate of stroke compared with a cohort of patients with influenza Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate possible thrombotic mechanisms associated with COVID-19

741 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Management of RH includes maximization of lifestyle interventions, use of long-acting thiazide-like diuretics, addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and, if BP remains elevated, stepwise addition of antihypertensive drugs with complementary mechanisms of action to lower BP.
Abstract: Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as above-goal elevated blood pressure (BP) in a patient despite the concurrent use of 3 antihypertensive drug classes, commonly including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker), and a diuretic. The antihypertensive drugs should be administered at maximum or maximally tolerated daily doses. RH also includes patients whose BP achieves target values on ≥4 antihypertensive medications. The diagnosis of RH requires assurance of antihypertensive medication adherence and exclusion of the "white-coat effect" (office BP above goal but out-of-office BP at or below target). The importance of RH is underscored by the associated risk of adverse outcomes compared with non-RH. This article is an updated American Heart Association scientific statement on the detection, evaluation, and management of RH. Once antihypertensive medication adherence is confirmed and out-of-office BP recordings exclude a white-coat effect, evaluation includes identification of contributing lifestyle issues, detection of drugs interfering with antihypertensive medication effectiveness, screening for secondary hypertension, and assessment of target organ damage. Management of RH includes maximization of lifestyle interventions, use of long-acting thiazide-like diuretics (chlorthalidone or indapamide), addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and, if BP remains elevated, stepwise addition of antihypertensive drugs with complementary mechanisms of action to lower BP. If BP remains uncontrolled, referral to a hypertension specialist is advised.

571 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Collaborators aim to provide real-time information and guidance to parents and clinicians on how to care for their children during the neonatal intensive care unit and beyond.
Abstract: Alexis A. Topjian, MD, MSCE, Chair; Tia T. Raymond, MD, Vice-Chair; Dianne Atkins, MD; Melissa Chan, MD; Jonathan P. Duff, MD, Med; Benny L. Joyner Jr, MD, MPH; Javier J. Lasa, MD; Eric J. Lavonas, MD, MS; Arielle Levy, MD, Med; Melissa Mahgoub, PhD; Garth D. Meckler, MD, MSHS; Kathryn E. Roberts, MSN, RN; Robert M. Sutton, MD, MSCE; Stephen M. Schexnayder, MD; On behalf of the Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Collaborators

567 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that obesity can no longer be evaluated solely by the body mass index (expressed in kg/m2) because it represents a heterogeneous entity and should be referred to obesities rather than obesity.
Abstract: This review addresses the interplay between obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases. It is proposed that obesity, generally defined by an excess of body fat causing prejudice to health, can no longer be evaluated solely by the body mass index (expressed in kg/m2) because it represents a heterogeneous entity. For instance, several cardiometabolic imaging studies have shown that some individuals who have a normal weight or who are overweight are at high risk if they have an excess of visceral adipose tissue-a condition often accompanied by accumulation of fat in normally lean tissues (ectopic fat deposition in liver, heart, skeletal muscle, etc). On the other hand, individuals who are overweight or obese can nevertheless be at much lower risk than expected when faced with excess energy intake if they have the ability to expand their subcutaneous adipose tissue mass, particularly in the gluteal-femoral area. Hence, excessive amounts of visceral adipose tissue and of ectopic fat largely define the cardiovascular disease risk of overweight and moderate obesity. There is also a rapidly expanding subgroup of patients characterized by a high accumulation of body fat (severe obesity). Severe obesity is characterized by specific additional cardiovascular health issues that should receive attention. Because of the difficulties of normalizing body fat content in patients with severe obesity, more aggressive treatments have been studied in this subgroup of individuals such as obesity surgery, also referred to as metabolic surgery. On the basis of the above, we propose that we should refer to obesities rather than obesity.

496 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document details the procedures and recommendations of the Goals and Metrics Committee of the Strategic Planning Task Force of the American Heart Association, which developed the 2020 Impact Goals, to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% while reducing deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke by 20%.
Abstract: This document details the procedures and recommendations of the Goals and Metrics Committee of the Strategic Planning Task Force of the American Heart Association, which developed the 2020 Impact Goals for the organization. The committee was charged with defining a new concept, cardiovascular health, and determining the metrics needed to monitor it over time. Ideal cardiovascular health, a concept well supported in the literature, is defined by the presence of both ideal health behaviors (nonsmoking, body mass index 25 kg/m 2 , physical activity at goal levels, and pursuit of a diet consistent with current guideline recommendations) and ideal health factors (untreated total cholesterol 200 mg/dL, untreated blood pressure 120/80 mm Hg, and fasting blood glucose 100 mg/dL). Appropriate levels for children are also provided. With the use of levels that span the entire range of the same metrics, cardiovascular health status for the whole population is defined as poor, intermediate, or ideal. These metrics will be monitored to determine the changing prevalence of cardiovascular health status and define achievement of the Impact Goal. In addition, the committee recommends goals for further reductions in cardiovascular disease and stroke mortality. Thus, the committee recommends the following Impact Goals: "By 2020, to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% while reducing deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke by 20%." These goals will require new strategic directions for the American Heart Association in its research, clinical, public health, and advocacy programs for cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention in the next decade and beyond. (Circulation. 2010;121:586-613.)

3,473 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 2010-Stroke
TL;DR: In the United States, the incidence rate of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795 000 per year, and stroke prevalence for individuals over the age of 20 years is estimated at 6.5 million as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: In the United States, the incidence rate of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795 000 per year, and stroke prevalence for individuals over the age of 20 years is estimated at 6.5 million.1 Mortality rates in the first 30 days after stroke have decreased because of advances in emergency medicine and acute stroke care. In addition, there is strong evidence that organized postacute, inpatient stroke care delivered within the first 4 weeks by an interdisciplinary healthcare team results in an absolute reduction in the number of deaths.2,3 Despite these positive achievements, stroke continues to represent the leading cause of long-term disability in Americans: An estimated 50 million stroke survivors worldwide currently cope with significant physical, cognitive, and emotional deficits, and 25% to 74% of these survivors require some assistance or are fully dependent on caregivers for activities of daily living (ADLs).4,5 Notwithstanding the substantial progress in acute stroke care over the past 15 years, the focus of stroke medical advances and healthcare resources has been on acute and subacute recovery phases, which has resulted in substantial health disparities in later phases of stroke care. Additionally, healthcare providers (HCPs) are often unaware of not only patients’ potential for improvement during more chronic recovery phases but also common issues that stroke survivors and their caregivers experience. Furthermore, even with evidence that documents neuroplasticity potential regardless of age and time after stroke,6 the mean lifetime cost of ischemic stroke (which accounts for 87% of all strokes) in the United States is an estimated $140 000 (for inpatient, rehabilitation, and follow-up costs), with 70% of first-year stroke costs attributed to acute inpatient hospital care1; therefore, fewer financial resources appear to be dedicated to providing optimal care during the later phases of stroke recovery. Because there remains a …

616 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The principal goals of health care are to help people “live longer and live better,” that is, to optimize both survival and health, and the metrics of cardiovascular health have not been well delineated compared with other cardiovascular mortality and morbidity outcomes.
Abstract: The principal goals of health care are to help people “live longer and live better,” that is, to optimize both survival and health. In the American Heart Association’s (AHA) special report, “Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond,” the AHA set the following goal: > “By 2020, to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% while reducing deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke by 20%.” 1 The emphasis on improving cardiovascular health is laudable, yet it raises the question of how cardiovascular health is best measured. Indeed, the metrics of cardiovascular health have not been well delineated compared with other cardiovascular mortality and morbidity outcomes. The AHA’s strategic goals primarily focus on ideal health behaviors (eg, not smoking) and ideal health factors (eg, blood pressure control) as metrics of cardiovascular health.1 Although these are of clear import, they do not directly address the World Health Organization’s definition of health as “… a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being.”2 Moreover, the Institute of Medicine identified patient-centered care as 1 of the 6 domains of high-quality health care, wherein patient-centered care supports clinicians in “attending to their patients’ physical and emotional needs, and maintaining or improving their quality of life.”3 The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute emphasizes the goal of “focusing on outcomes that people notice and care about such as survival, function, symptoms, and health related quality of life.”4 Recent concepts of value in health care and the “triple aim” center on improving patients’ health and experience with health care while reducing costs; each reinforces the importance of assessing the impact of disease and medical treatment on patients’ functional status and quality of life.5,6 The definition …

448 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence emphasizes that an individual’s health behaviors have a major role in the prevention of CVD, which is of critical importance in the United States and worldwide from a medical and economic perspective.
Abstract: The recent 2012 update of the Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics from the American Heart Association (AHA) emphasizes the continuing burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the United States, with a prevalence of CVD nearing 40% in those approaching 60 years of age and exceeding 70% in older ages.1 Direct and indirect costs of CVD in the United States exceeded $300 billion in 2008, and the projected total costs of CVD in 2015 and 2030 are more than $500 billion and nearly $1200 billion, respectively.2 Recently, the AHA developed year 2020 impact goals to achieve ideal cardiovascular health, which is influenced greatly by key health behaviors of being physically active, maintaining appropriate dietary habits, and not smoking.3 The obesity epidemic in the United States has been a substantial contributor to the CVD burden, with current estimates of obesity prevalence being ≈20% in US children and adolescents and >33% in adults 20 to 74 years of age. It is well accepted that for most people, obesity is a direct outcome of an energy-rich diet, lack of sufficient physical activity (PA), or both. Another consequence of both obesity and insufficient PA is a reduction in cardiorespiratory (or aerobic) fitness (CRF) levels. Collectively, this evidence emphasizes that an individual’s health behaviors have a major role in the prevention of CVD, which is of critical importance in the United States and worldwide from a medical and economic perspective. Increasing attention is being given to the importance of PA and physical fitness (PF), both muscular fitness and especially CRF, for decreasing chronic diseases, promoting overall cardiovascular and general health, improving quality of life, and delaying CVD and mortality in the US population.4,5 Clearly, PF and CRF in particular are an underpinning for academic achievement, job productivity, and overall maintenance …

315 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2002-Stroke
TL;DR: The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of social problem-solving telephone partnerships on primary family caregiver outcomes after stroke survivors are discharged home from a rehabilitation facility.
Abstract: Background and Purpose— Social problem-solving therapy shows promise as an intervention to improve the well-being of family caregivers. There is some evidence that training in problem solving may be effectively delivered by telephone. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of social problem-solving telephone partnerships on primary family caregiver outcomes after stroke survivors are discharged home from a rehabilitation facility. Methods— Using a randomized 3-group repeated-measures experimental design, 74 stroke survivors with an admitting diagnosis of ischemic stroke and their primary family caregivers were entered into the study. The intervention consisted of an initial 3-hour home visit between a trained nurse and the family caregiver within 1 week after discharge to begin problem-solving skill training. This initial session was followed by weekly (the first month) and biweekly (the second and third month) telephone contacts. Results— Compared with the sham intervention and control grou...

255 citations