Q2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies" ?
In this article, the authors have discussed the possibilities for promoting critical thinking in schools. The authors conclude this article by formulating questions for further research aimed at promoting the critical competence of students from the perspective of developing citizenship. As the development of citizenship by definition involves all students, it is important to obtain more insight into the possibilities or lack thereof for stimulating reflection in this group of students. Further research is required on the characteristics of the school culture and school organization that in conjunction with or in addition to characteristics at the level of the classroom promote critical thinking in students.
Q3. What are the main types of tests used in the study?
Tests ususally focus on critical-thinking skills, such as inference, recognition of assumptions, deduction, interpretation, and evaluation of arguments.
Q4. What are the characteristics of instruction that are assumed to enhance critical thinking?
Characteristics of instruction that are assumed to enhance critical thinking are: paying attention to the development of the epistemological beliefs of students; promoting active learning; a problem-based curriculum; and stimulating interaction between students.
Q5. What is the important part of critical thinking?
For Kuhn (1999) both metacognitive skills, metacognitive knowledge and epistemological beliefs are crucial for critical thinking.
Q6. What are the main characteristics of self-reports?
Self-reports measuring critical thinking typically mention skills as ‘being able to recognize presuppositions’ and ‘being able to think about alternatives’.
Q7. What is the fundamental and questionable assumption of the approach?
The most fundamental and questionable assumptions of these approaches (whether formal or informal) is that critical thinking can be successfully taught as a battery of technical skills which can be mastered more or less one by one without giving serious attention to self-deception, background logic, and multi-categorical ethical issues’.
Q8. What are the main findings of Tsui and Terenzini?
Both Tsui and Terenzini et al.discuss Smith’s (1977) findings that courses eliciting a high level (amount and cog-nitive level) of student participation, instructor encouragement, praise and use ofstudents’ ideas, and the amount of peer-to-peer interaction are positively related togains in critical thinking.
Q9. What is the effect of group discussion on students’ cognitive skills?
An experimental study with a pretest–posttest design (N ¼ 118) was conducted to answer the question whether group discussion facilitates the development of critical-thinking skills more than traditional methods of instruction such as lectures (measured by means of undergraduate students’ demonstrations).
Q10. What is the effect of taking multiple choice exams on students’ critical thinking?
self-reported growth in critical thinking is positively related to having a paper critiqued by an instructor, conducting an independent research project, working on a group project, giving a class presentation, and taking essay exams, but negatively related to taking multiple choice exams.
Q11. What is the main concern of Burbules and Berk?
In their overview of the main differences between critical thinking and critical pedagogy, Burbules and Berk (1999) point out that the strict distinction between facts and values in the criticalthinking tradition makes the consequences of certain knowledge on institutional and societal levels invisible.