scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Crystal structure of bis(1,8-dibenzoyl-7-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)terephthalate: Terephthalate phenylene moiety acts as bidentate hydrogen acceptor of bidirectional C-H···π non-classical hydrogen bonds

30 Jun 2021-European Journal of Chemistry (European Journal of Chemistry)-Vol. 12, Iss: 2, pp 147-153
About: This article is published in European Journal of Chemistry.The article was published on 2021-06-30 and is currently open access. It has received 2 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Phenylene & Moiety.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the toluene solvate crystal of the titled highly congested aromatic ketone-ester compound has been subjected to crystal structural analysis from the viewpoints of the clarification of distribution feature of effective non-classical hydrogen bonds and the retention and perturbation of the symmetric nature.
Abstract: Abstract The toluene solvate crystal of the titled highly congested aromatic ketone-ester compound has been subjected to crystal structural analysis from the viewpoints of the clarification of distribution feature of effective non-classical hydrogen bonds and the retention and perturbation of the symmetric nature. The two independent molecules of the title naphthalene derivative, which bears two aroyl groups at the adjacent inner positions and two benzoyloxy groups at the neighboring β-positions, and one disordered solvent toluene molecule are incorporated in the asymmetric unit of P21 /c (Z′= 2). In the packing of the solvate crystal, the solvent toluene molecule plays the multi roles of hydrogen donor/acceptor for C–H…π non-classical hydrogen bonds and hydrogen donor for C–H…O = C ones. On the other hand, the role of other benzene rings of the parts of the title compound molecules is confined. The 4-methylbenzoyl groups situated at the molecular inner positions mainly play the role of the hydrogen donor of C–H…π non-classical hydrogen bond. The benzoyloxy groups that extend outward from the molecular body mainly act as the hydrogen acceptors of C–H…O and C–H…π non-classical hydrogen bonds. The naphthalene ring moderately contributes as the hydrogen acceptor for C–H…π non-classical hydrogen bonds and as the hydrogen donor for C–H…O non-classical hydrogen bonds. The roles of the toluene molecule are not limited to a simple filler for the void among the major constituent molecules but proved to position at the pseudo-centrosymmetric center of the counter-configurated pair of molecules of the independent major component compounds to concentrate the effective non-classical hydrogen bonds.

1 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: New features added to the refinement program SHELXL since 2008 are described and explained.
Abstract: The improvements in the crystal structure refinement program SHELXL have been closely coupled with the development and increasing importance of the CIF (Crystallographic Information Framework) format for validating and archiving crystal structures. An important simplification is that now only one file in CIF format (for convenience, referred to simply as `a CIF') containing embedded reflection data and SHELXL instructions is needed for a complete structure archive; the program SHREDCIF can be used to extract the .hkl and .ins files required for further refinement with SHELXL. Recent developments in SHELXL facilitate refinement against neutron diffraction data, the treatment of H atoms, the determination of absolute structure, the input of partial structure factors and the refinement of twinned and disordered structures. SHELXL is available free to academics for the Windows, Linux and Mac OS X operating systems, and is particularly suitable for multiple-core processors.

28,425 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that crystal engineering is a new organic synthesis, and that rather than being only nominally relevant to organic chemistry, this subject is well within the mainstream, being surprisingly similar to traditional organic synthesis in concept.
Abstract: A crystal of an organic compound is the ultimate supermolecule, and its assembly, governed by chemical and geometrical factors, from individual molecules is the perfect example of solid-state molecular recognition. Implicit in the supramolecular description of a crystal structure is the fact that molecules in a crystal are held together by noncovalent interactions. The need for rational approaches towards solid-state structures of fundamental and practical importance has led to the emergence of crystal engineering, which seeks to understand intermolecular interactions and recognition phenomena in the context of crystal packing. The aim of crystal engineering is to establish reliable connections between molecular and supramolecular structure on the basis of intermolecular interactions. Ideally one would like to identify substructural units in a target supermolecule that can be assembled from logically chosen precursor molecules. Indeed, crystal engineering is a new organic synthesis, and the aim of this article is to show that rather than being only nominally relevant to organic chemistry, this subject is well within the mainstream, being surprisingly similar to traditional organic synthesis in concept. The details vary because one is dealing here with intermolecular interactions rather than with covalent bonds; so this article is divided into two parts. The first is concerned with strategy, highlighting the conceptual relationship between crystal engineering and organic synthesis and introduces the term supramolecular synthon. The second part emphasizes methodology, that is, the chemical and geometrical properties of specific intermolecular interactions.

4,237 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is clearly no longer necessary to justify the relevance of C-H’‚‚O hydrogen bonds, so widely invoked are they in small-molecule and biological crystallography and supramolecular synthesis and crystal engineering.
Abstract: The C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond is so well-established in structural chemistry that it seems difficult now to believe that when Sutor proposed the existence of this type of hydrogen bond in the early 1960s,1,2 her suggestion was drowned in scepticism, if not outright hostility.3 It was only two decades later, with Taylor and Kennard’s paper, that the subject was properly revived.4 Shortly thereafter, an Account appeared from this laboratory describing the role of the C-H‚‚‚O interaction in crystal engineering.5 Subsequently, one felt confident enough to term these erstwhile “interactions” hydrogen bonds, in a second Account.6 A recent invitation to contribute another Account and the many recent efforts in this direction by my students and postdoctorals have led to the present paper. It is clearly no longer necessary to justify the relevance of C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds, so widely invoked are they in small-molecule and biological crystallography. The presence of O-atoms in a large majority of organic molecules means that this hydrogen bond is widespread, even if not identified in many cases. However, other questions concerning these weak hydrogen bonds could be posed: (1) What is their upper distance limit? (2) Are very short, bent bonds significant? (3) Why do C-H‚‚‚O bonds sometimes disturb the strong O-H‚‚‚O and N-H‚‚‚O network? Alternatively, why do hydrogen bond donors and acceptors not always pair in descending order of strength? (4) How important is cooperativity for weak hydrogen bonds? (5) Are C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds responsible for crystal packing, or are they the forced consequences of packing? (6) Are weak hydrogen bonds robust enough for supramolecular synthesis and crystal engineering? (7) Does the C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond have any biological significance? These difficult questions cannot be answered fully. This Account attempts to address some of them, but better answers can only follow from further work.

1,659 citations