scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere

Dylan Minor, +1 more
- 01 May 2011 - 
- Vol. 53, Iss: 3, pp 40-59
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a case study and a multi-year analysis of stock price responses for S&P 500 companies following product recalls was conducted, and the authors found that firms that have high CSR ratings fare better than those that do not.
Abstract
An overlooked but important benefit of CSR is to insure a firm against a decline in reputation in the face of adverse events. Through a case study and a multi-year analysis of stock price responses for S&P 500 companies following product recalls, we find that firms that have high CSR ratings fare better than those that do not. Furthermore, a firm that is exceptional in both doing good and avoiding harm suffers virtually no reputational damage following negative media publicity. Using the results of this study, we offer a guide to managers for determining the appropriate amount and mix of CSR activities.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities

TL;DR: The authors examined the empirical association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and tax avoidance and found that firms with excessive irresponsible CSR activities have a higher likelihood of engaging in tax sheltering activities and greater discretionary/permanent book-tax differences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities

TL;DR: This paper examined the empirical association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and tax avoidance and found that firms with excessive irresponsible CSR activities have a higher likelihood of engaging in tax-sheltering activities and greater discretionary/permanent book-tax differences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analytic analysis of 149 studies on the relationship between corporate environmental performance (CEP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) is presented, showing that there is a positive and partially bidirectional relationship between CEP and CFP.
Journal ArticleDOI

Washing Away Your Sins? Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility, and Firm Performance

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the questions of whether and how corporate social responsibility (CSR) relates to firm performance and identify four mechanisms pertaining to this relationship: slack resources lead to CSR, CSR improves performance, CSI makes amends for past corporate social irresponsibility (CSI), and CSR insures against subsequent CSI (i.e., insurance mechanism).
Journal ArticleDOI

Stakeholder Pressures as Determinants of CSR Strategic Choice: Why do Firms Choose Symbolic Versus Substantive Self-Regulatory Codes of Conduct?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the impact of different stakeholders' pressures on the selection of strategic choices to join SRCs and show that corporations react differently to different sets of stakeholder pressures and that the SRC selection depends on the type and intensiveness of the stakeholder pressure as well as the resources at hand to respond to those pressures.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy And Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a complex theoretical explanation that draws on multiple bodies of literature to present an academically rigorous version of a simple argument: good deeds earn chits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance

TL;DR: This article conducted a meta-analysis of 251 studies presented in 214 manuscripts and found that the overall effect is positive but small (mean r =.13, median r = 0.09, weighted r = 1.11), and results for the 106 studies from the past decade are even smaller.
Journal ArticleDOI

How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine how well the most widely used ratings, those of Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Research & Analytics (KLD), provide transparency about past and likely future environmental performance.
Related Papers (5)