Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids: Fundamental Principles
Carissa Bonner,Lyndal Trevena,Wolfgang Gaissmaier,Paul K. J. Han,Yasmina Okan,Elissa M. Ozanne,Ellen Peters,Danielle R.M. Timmermans,Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher +8 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors present a review of patient decision aids for shared decision making in a way they can easily understand and compare with the patient's decision process, and present evidence to convey to the patient.Abstract:
BackgroundShared decision making requires evidence to be conveyed to the patient in a way they can easily understand and compare. Patient decision aids facilitate this process. This article reviews...read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Communicating with patients and the public about COVID-19 vaccine safety: recommendations from the Collaboration on Social Science and Immunisation.
Julie Leask,Julie Leask,Samantha Carlson,Katie Attwell,Katie Attwell,Katrina K Clark,Jessica Kaufman,Catherine Hughes,Jane Frawley,Patrick Cashman,Holly Seal,Kerrie Wiley,Katarzyna Bolsewicz,Maryke S. Steffens,Margie Danchin +14 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis:
Holly O. Witteman,Ruth Ndjaboue,Gratianne Vaisson,Selma Chipenda Dansokho,Bob Arnold,John F.P. Bridges,Sandrine Comeau,Angela Fagerlin,Teresa Gavaruzzi,Melina Marcoux,Arwen H. Pieterse,Michael Pignone,Thierry Provencher,Charles Racine,Dean A. Regier,Charlotte Rochefort-Brihay,Praveen Thokala,Marieke Geertruida Maria Weernink,Douglas B. White,Celia E. Wills,Jesse Jansen +20 more
TL;DR: In this paper, patient decision aids should help people make evidence-informed decisions aligned with their values, but there is limited guidance about how to achieve such alignment, and the guidance is limited.
Journal ArticleDOI
The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0.
Journal ArticleDOI
Redevelopment of the Predict: Breast Cancer website and recommendations for developing interfaces to support decision-making
George D. Farmer,George D. Farmer,Mike Pearson,William J. Skylark,Alexandra L. J. Freeman,David Spiegelhalter +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a new interface for the widely used prognostic breast cancer tool: Predict: Breast Cancer, to facilitate decision-making around post-surgery breast cancer treatments and derive recommendations for communicating the outputs of prognostic models to patients and their clinicians.
Journal ArticleDOI
Interventions Using Heart Age for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Communication: Systematic Review of Psychological, Behavioral, and Clinical Effects.
Carissa Bonner,Carys Batcup,Samuel Cornell,Michael Anthony Fajardo,Anna L. Hawkes,Lyndal Trevena,Jenny Doust +6 more
TL;DR: The findings of this review provide little evidence that heart age motivates lifestyle behavior change more than absolute risk, but either format can improve clinical outcomes when combined with other behavior change strategies.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
TL;DR: The notion of "degrees of belief" was introduced by Knight as mentioned in this paper, who argued that people tend to behave "as though" they assigned numerical probabilities to events, or degrees of belief to the events impinging on their actions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
Glyn Elwyn,Annette M. O'Connor,Dawn Stacey,Robert J. Volk,Adrian Edwards,Angela Coulter,Richard Thomson,Alexandra Barratt,Michael J. Barry,Steven J. Bernstein,Phyllis Butow,Aileen Clarke,Vikki Entwistle,Deb Feldman-Stewart,Margaret Holmes-Rovner,Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas,Nora Moumjid,Albert G. Mulley,Cornelia M. Ruland,Karen Sepucha,Alan Sykes,Timothy J. Whelan +21 more
TL;DR: Criteria were given the highest ratings where evidence existed, and these were retained, and developers, users, and purchasers of patient decision aids now have a checklist for appraising quality.
Journal ArticleDOI
General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.
TL;DR: The results suggest that even highly educated participants have difficulty with relatively simple numeracy questions, thus replicating in part earlier studies that usual strategies for communicating numerical risk may be flawed.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Meaning and the Measure of Health Literacy
TL;DR: Computer-assisted testing, which selects items from a bank of possible items according to a baseline-predicted reading ability and responses to previous questions, should allow more accurate measurement of indiidual capacity without increasing the time required to complete testing.
Journal ArticleDOI
Numeracy and Decision Making
TL;DR: Findings were consistent with highly numerate individuals being more likely to retrieve and use appropriate numerical principles, thus making themselves less susceptible to framing effects, and their affective responses were more precise.