scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
BookDOI

Cycles of Conflict, Centuries of Change: Crisis, Reform, and Revolution in Mexico

TL;DR: Antonio Annino, Guillermo de la Pena, Francois-Xavier Guerra, Friedrich Katz, Alan Knight, Lorenzo Meyer, Leticia Reina, Enrique Semo, Elisa Servin, John Tutino, and Eric Van Young as discussed by the authors explore how Mexico's tumultuous past informs its uncertain present and future.
Abstract: This important collection explores how Mexico’s tumultuous past informs its uncertain present and future. Cycles of crisis and reform, of conflict and change, have marked Mexico’s modern history. The final decades of the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries each brought efforts to integrate Mexico into globalizing economies, pressures on the country’s diverse peoples, and attempts at reform. The crises of the late eighteenth century and the late nineteenth led to revolutionary mobilizations and violent regime changes. The wars for independence that began in 1810 triggered conflicts that endured for decades; the national revolution that began in 1910 shaped Mexico for most of the twentieth century. In 2000, the PRI, which had ruled for more than seventy years, was defeated in an election some hailed as “revolution by ballot.” Mexico now struggles with the legacies of a late-twentieth-century crisis defined by accelerating globalization and the breakdown of an authoritarian regime that was increasingly unresponsive to historic mandates and popular demands. Leading Mexicanists—historians and social scientists from Mexico, the United States, and Europe—examine the three fin-de-siecle eras of crisis. They focus on the role of the country’s communities in advocating change from the eighteenth century to the present. They compare Mexico’s revolutions of 1810 and 1910 and consider whether there might be a twenty-first-century recurrence or whether a globalizing, urbanizing, and democratizing world has so changed Mexico that revolution is improbable. Reflecting on the political changes and social challenges of the late twentieth century, the contributors ask if a democratic transition is possible and, if so, whether it is sufficient to address twenty-first-century demands for participation and justice. Contributors . Antonio Annino, Guillermo de la Pena, Francois-Xavier Guerra, Friedrich Katz, Alan Knight, Lorenzo Meyer, Leticia Reina, Enrique Semo, Elisa Servin, John Tutino, Eric Van Young
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Carrera Panamericana (PanAmerican Road Race) was first organized by the Asociación Nacional Automovilística (ANA) in Mexico in 1950 as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: I 1950, Mexico’s Asociación Nacional Automovilística (National Automobile Association, or ANA), with the aid of national, state, and local government, staged an international automobile race dubbed the Carrera Panamericana (PanAmerican Road Race), celebrating the inauguration of the country’s section of the PanAmerican Highway. The spectacle, which earned the embarrassing name “carrera de la muerte” or death race, took drivers from Ciudad Juárez on the northern border with the United States all the way to the edge of Guatemala. After 1950, organizers turned the race into a yearly event, lasting until 1954, when it was fi nally cancelled by presidential decree. For fi ve years this ritual of modernization attracted hundreds of entrants from across Europe and the Americas, while reporters spread throughout the world news of the riveting exploits of daring drivers and announced in an unprecedented manner the nation’s apparent assent to modernity, what later analysts would call the “Mexican Miracle.” The image of stateoftheart, aerodynamic machines, barreling down the newly inaugurated and Mexicanbuilt PanAmerican Highway seemed to many to embody the aspirations of post1940 developmentalism. Roads, machines, and industrial growth would put the nail in the coffi n of the old imagery of burros and backwardness, while industrialization would create the wealth necessary to meet the needs of all citizens. What is more, hemispheric communications, advocates proclaimed, would fi nally link all nations of the Americas, advancing the cause

7 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a comparative overview of the situation of the Indigenous societies of the Americas in 1808 around three main lines of analysis: their degree of ecological autonomy, their capacity for cultural control, and their ability for ethnogenesis is presented.
Abstract: This article presents a comparative overview of the situation of the Indigenous societies of the Americas in 1808 around three main lines of analysis: their degree of ecological autonomy, their capacity for cultural control, and their capacity for ethnogenesis. The comparison extends beyond the sedentary, stratified societies of Mesoamerica and the Andes to include non-State groups in Lowland South America and Northern New Spain, and tries to explain their contrasting reactions to the crisis of the Iberian empires that started that year.

6 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper examined how the Torre Latinoamericana, constructed between 1948 and 1956, was represented through a modern-historic discourse, how it transformed urban space in Mexico City, and what forms of technology were used in the construction.
Abstract: In this essay I examine how the Torre Latinoamericana, constructed between 1948 and 1956, was represented through a modern-historic discourse, how it transformed urban space in Mexico City, and what forms of technology were used in the construction. I demonstrate how the Torre Latinoamericana was both material evidence of progress (modernity) and a metaphor for Mexican aspirations of modernity. I use the “modernist sensibility” of the Mexican Miracle as a lens through which the architecture and technology of the Torre Latinoamericana may be seen as part of the modernist project prevalent in Mexico during the 1950s. “Modernist sensibility” refers to framing the building within cultural history that concerns itself with the creation and registration of affect within the Mexican modernist discourse. I examine the Torre Latinoamericana through various forms of media – newspapers, photographs, film, tourist pamphlets and engineering journals—which generated the discursive construction of the highway and justified its material existence. This study explores how the building's sophisticated construction materials represented abstract concepts such as modernity, progress, and technology. This study shows how the Torre Latinoamericana served as a sign of progress, and a discourse of progress, thus projecting a vision as to where Mexico was headed as a nation and society in the 1950s–60s. By showing that the Torre Latinoamericana was transformed into a symbol of national pride and identity, this research highlights the importance of investigating material culture, in this case architecture, and the affects of such in the production of national discourse.

2 citations