Cyclosporine short infusion and C2 monitoring in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
TL;DR: CsA infusions in 2 h during transplant and perform C2 monitoring to obtain therapeutic C2 levels ⩾800 μg/l are recommended.
Abstract: Blood concentrations of cyclosporine A (CsA) >or=800 microg/l measured 2 h post-dosing, the C2 concentration, is necessary to obtain a maximal pharmacological effect and correlates well with transplant-related complications such as transplant rejection and toxicity. In an open crossover study CsA blood levels were measured during 24 h to generate a pharmacokinetic profile on days 1, 8 and 15 after starting CsA infusion in 21 haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients who were receiving intravenously CsA 3 mg/kg/day either by continuous infusion or by 2 h infusion given every 12 h. C2 levels after the 2 h infusion correlated better than C1 or C3 levels with the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h (r2=0.62). C2 levels >or=800 microg/l were also achieved for 20 out of 24 (83%) of cases after the 2 h infusion of CsA without any increase of CsA-related toxicity but for only three of the 23 patients (13%) after continuous infusion. Therefore, we recommend CsA infusions in 2 h during transplant and perform C2 monitoring to obtain therapeutic C2 levels >or=800 microg/l.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: Future pharmacokinetic/dynamic research of postgraft immunosuppressants should include ‘–omics’-based tools: pharmacogenomics may be used to gain an improved understanding of the covariates influencing pharmacokinetics as well as proteomics and metabolomics as novel methods to elucidate pharmacodynamic responses.
Abstract: Part I of this article included a pertinent review of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the role of postgraft immunosuppression in alloHCT, and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of the calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate. In this article (Part II), we review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of mycophenolic acid (MPA), sirolimus, and the antithymocyte globulins (ATG). We then discuss target concentration intervention (TCI) of these postgraft immunosuppressants in alloHCT patients, with a focus on current evidence for TCI and on how TCI may improve clinical management in these patients. Currently, TCI using trough concentrations is conducted for sirolimus in alloHCT patients. Several studies demonstrate that MPA plasma exposure is associated with clinical outcomes, with an increasing number of alloHCT patients needing TCI of MPA. Compared with MPA, there are fewer pharmacokinetic/dynamic studies of rabbit ATG and horse ATG in alloHCT patients. Future pharmacokinetic/dynamic research of postgraft immunosuppressants should include '-omics'-based tools: pharmacogenomics may be used to gain an improved understanding of the covariates influencing pharmacokinetics as well as proteomics and metabolomics as novel methods to elucidate pharmacodynamic responses.
46 citations
TL;DR: It is shown that functional CD161+CCR6+ co-expressing T cells disappear from the circulation and home to GVHD-affected tissue sites, which supports the hypothesis that CCR6+CD161-expressed T cells may be involved in the immune pathology of GV HD following their CCL20-dependent recruitment into affected tissues.
Abstract: The C-type lectin-like receptor CD161 is a well-established marker for human IL17-producing T cells, which have been implicated to contribute to the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In this study, we analyzed CD161+ T cell recovery, their functional properties and association with GVHD occurrence in allo-SCT recipients. While CD161+CD4+ T cells steadily recovered, CD161hiCD8+ T cell numbers declined during tapering of Cyclosporine A (CsA), which can be explained by their initial growth advantage over CD161neg/lowCD8+ T cells due to ABCB1-mediated CsA efflux. Interestingly, occurrence of acute and chronic GVHD was significantly correlated with decreased levels of circulating CD161+CD4+ as well as CD161hiCD8+ T cells. In addition, these subsets from transplanted patients secreted high levels of IFNγ and IL17. Moreover, we found that CCR6 co-expression by CD161+ T cells mediated specific migration towards CCL20, which was expressed in GVHD biopsies. Finally, we demonstrated that CCR6+ T cells indeed were present in these CCL20+ GVHD-affected tissues. In conclusion, we showed that functional CD161+CCR6+ co-expressing T cells disappear from the circulation and home to GVHD-affected tissue sites. These findings support the hypothesis that CCR6+CD161-expressing T cells may be involved in the immune pathology of GVHD following their CCL20-dependent recruitment into affected tissues.
36 citations
Cites methods from "Cyclosporine short infusion and C2 ..."
...To determine whether expression of the ABCB1 multi-drug transporter indeed mediates resistance of CD161-expressing T cells to CsA-induced functional impairment, CFSE-labelled PBMCs were stimulated in an MLR using irradiated allo-PBMCs in the presence or absence of physiological levels of CsA [44]....
[...]
TL;DR: A pharmacokinetic model was developed for orally and intravenously administered ciclosporin, enabling an adequate estimate of the systemic exposure of cic Losporin in patients after HSCT to develop a limited sampling strategy to determine systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC]), in order to optimize CsA therapy in this patient population.
Abstract: WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT
• The population pharmacokinetics and limited sampling strategies for ciclosporin monitoring have been extensively studied in renal and liver transplant recipients. Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in patients undergoing haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
• It is anticipated that there is a difference in pharmacokinetics in patients after kidney or liver transplantation compared with patients undergoing stem cell transplantation, because of mucositis and interacting drugs (e.g. fluconazole).
• Data on the pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and the relationship between its systemic exposure, as reflected by the area under the curve (AUC), and the biological effect as graft vs. host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and graft vs. tumour (GVT) response are scarce in patients after HSCT.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
• A pharmacokinetic model was developed for orally and intravenously administered ciclosporin, enabling an adequate estimate of the systemic exposure of ciclosporin in patients after HSCT. A limited sampling strategy was tested that may serve as a tool to study the optimum systemic exposure (AUC) of ciclosporin in HSCT to prevent GVHD but establish adequate GVT response and to guide therapeutic drug monitoring.
AIM To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin (CsA) in haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation to facilitate a limited sampling strategy to determine systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC]), in order to optimize CsA therapy in this patient population.
METHODS The pharmacokinetics of CsA were investigated prospectively in 20 patients following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CsA was given twice daily, as a 3 h i.v. infusion starting at day 1 of the conditioning scheme, and orally later on, when oral intake was well tolerated. Fluconazole was given as antimycotic prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimation was performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling as implemented in the NONMEM program. A first order absorption model with lag time was compared with Erlang frequency distribution and Weibull distribution models. The influence of demographic variables on the individual empirical Bayesian estimates of clearance and distribution volume was tested. Subsequently two limited sampling strategies (LSS) were evaluated: posterior Bayesian fitting and limited sampling equations.
RESULTS Twenty patients were included and 435 samples were collected after i.v. and oral administration of CsA. A two compartment model with first order absorption best described the data. Clearance (CL) was 21.9 l h−1 (relative standard deviation [RSD]± 5.2%) with an inter-individual variability of 21%. The central volume of distribution (Vc) was 18.3 l (RSD ± 8.7%) with an inter-individual variability of 29%. Bioavailability (F) was 0.71 (RSD ± 9.9%) with and inter-individual variability of 25% and lag time (tlag) was 0.44 h (RSD 5.5%). Weight, body surface area, haematocrit, albumin, ALAT and ASAT had no significant influence on pharmacokinetic parameters. The best multiple point combination for posterior Bayesian fitting, in terms of estimating systemic CsA exposure, appeared to be C0 + C2 + C3.
Two selected LSS two time point equations and all selected three and four time point equations predicted de all AUC(0,12 h) within 15% bias and prediction.
CONCLUSIONS The i.v. and oralcurves were best described with a two compartment model with first-order absorption with lag time. With the Bayesian estimators from this model, the area under the concentration−time curve in HSCT patients taking fluconazole can be estimated with only three blood samples (0, 2, 3 h) with a bias of 1% and precision of 4%.
31 citations
TL;DR: Interindividual variations in CsA uptake and metabolism may explain the wide variation of C2 levels without prediction for increased risk for severe aGVHD or infectious complication when C0 guided the CsSA dosing.
Abstract: Cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy based on 2-h concentrations (C2) after oral administration has demonstrated low acute rejection rates after solid organ transplantation We analysed the correlation between C2 and trough (C0) levels of oral CsA therapy in samples obtained twice in consecutive weeks from 58 patients during their first admission for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation Also 8-h concentration curves were obtained from 23 patients The mean (range) CsA dose was 332 (167–763) and 255 (113–575) mg/day for patients with matched unrelated donor (MUD) and human leukocyte antigen identical sibling donor (Sib), respectively Median (range) C0 and C2 were 254 (145–332) and 898 (419–1466) ng/ml in MUD patients, and 130 (93–265) and 554 (196–988) ng/ml in Sib patients In MUD patients with either aGVHD grade
23 citations
TL;DR: The results suggest that achievement of the institution's target trough cyclosporine (CSA) concentrations is important to aGvHD outcomes.
Abstract: This study evaluates our institution's target trough cyclosporine (CSA) concentrations as predictors of severe acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) in children receiving either matched related or unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The outcomes of 87 consecutive children who underwent allogeneic HSCT and received CSA and methotrexate as prophylaxis against aGvHD between October 1, 1999 and September 30, 2002 were retrospectively evaluated. The proportion of time that each patient maintained a whole blood CSA concentration within or above the initial target range (105-155 ng/mL or 155-210 ng/mL) was calculated for each of the following time periods: in each week after HSCT from day 0 to +28; in the week preceding engraftment; and in the week preceding the onset of aGvHD. Patients were prospectively evaluated twice weekly for the presence and severity of aGvHD by senior attending physicians. The relationship between potential predictors and the development of severe aGvHD was examined using univariate logistic regression. The main variables of interest were the proportion of time that therapeutic or supratherapeutic CSA concentrations were maintained; median CSA concentrations; the number of methotrexate doses received; and the use of folinic acid rescue. Mean follow-up time was 3.0+/-1.9 years among children who survived beyond day +100. Three variables were significantly associated with the development of severe aGvHD on univariate analysis: initial CSA target concentration [odds ratio (OR), 0.24; P=0.03], proportion of time the target CSA concentration was achieved during the second week after transplant (OR, 0.16; P=0.02), and proportion of time the target CSA concentration was achieved during the week before engraftment (OR, 0.22; P=0.0489). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an inverse relationship between the median CSA concentration during the week before engraftment and the development of severe aGvHD (OR, 0.99; P=0.045). These results suggest that achievement of our CSA target concentrations is important to aGvHD outcomes.
21 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The results show that despite histocompatibility matching and methotrexate therapy, GVHD remains a serious and often fatal complication of marrow transplantation.
Abstract: Sixty-one evaluable patients, 19 with advanced aplastic anemia and 42 with end stage hematological malignancies, were conditioned for marrow grafting with total body irradiation or cyclophosphamide, or a combination of both. Marrow graft donors were siblings matched at the HL-A region and nonreactiv
3,527 citations
TL;DR: The data suggest that a target AUC0-12 of 9500-11500 or AUC1-4 of 4400-5500 microg x h/L may provide optimal Neoral immunosuppression and early AUC based on PK0-4 is more closely associated with AR and CsANT than is C0.
Abstract: Background Cyclosporine (CsA) dosing is traditionally based on trough blood levels (C0) rather than area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), although AUC correlates better with posttransplantation clinical events. For Neoral, AUC based on limited sampling correlates closely with full 12-hr AUC. The purpose of our study was to correlate C0 with AUC based on CsA levels at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hr after dose (PK0-4) and to compare this AUC with C0 in predicting acute rejection (AR) and acute cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CsANT) in de novo first kidney transplant patients. Methods PK0-4 was done 2-4 days after starting Neoral for 156 patients. All received CsA-based triple-drug immunosuppression without antibody induction. AUC was calculated as projected 12-hr (AUC0-12) and actual 4-hr (AUC0-4) from the PK0-4 using the parallel trapezoid rule. Neoral dosing was based on C0 not AUC. AUC was retrospectively compared with C0 as a predictor of AR and CsANT during the first 90 days. Results C0 correlated poorly with AUC0-12 and AUC0-4 (r=0.61 and r=0.42). C0 (mean+/-SEM) levels were not significantly different in 34 patients with and 109 without AR (293+/-21 vs. 294+/-11 microg/L, P=0.95). AUC0-12 and AUC0-4 were significantly lower in patients with than without AR (AUC0-12 9090+/-598 vs. 10608+/-336 microg x h/L, P=0.01; AUC0-4 3934+/-306 vs. 4802+/-166 microg.h/L, P=0.006). In stepwise regression analysis only AUC0-12 or AUC0-4 (P=0.03/P=0.02) and delayed graft function (P=0.007) predicted AR. AUC0-12, AUC0-4, and C0 were all significantly higher in patients with CsANT than without CsANT (AUC0-12 11746+/-650 vs. 10023+/-301 microg x h/L, P=0.01; AUC0-4 5270+/-358 vs. 4474+/-150 microg x h/L, P=0.01; C0 343+/-18 vs. 287+/-10 microg/L, P=0.01), but in stepwise regression analysis C0 was not an independent predictor of CsANT. Patients with AUC0-12 in the range of 9500 to 11500 microg x h/L or AUC0-4 between 4400 and 5500 microg x h/L had the lowest incidence of AR (13% and 7%, respectively) without significantly higher risk for CsANT. Conclusion C0 correlates poorly with AUC based on PK0-4. Early AUC based on PK0-4 is more closely associated with AR and CsANT than is C0. Our data suggest that a target AUC0-12 of 9500-11500 or AUC0-4 of 4400-5500 microg x h/L may provide optimal Neoral immunosuppression.
378 citations
TL;DR: CsA induces partial CN inhibition that varies directly with the blood and tissue levels, and may be greater in some tissues due to higher drug accumulation, relevant to nephrotoxicity.
Abstract: Background Cyclosporine (CsA) acts by inhibiting the phosphatase calcineurin (CN), but the time course and extent of inhibition in vivo are unknown. We examined the effect of single oral CsA doses on CN activity in humans and mice in vivo. Methods In humans, blood CsA levels were determined and CN activity was measured in whole blood and in blood leukocytes of patients up to 12 hr after CsA dosing (just before the second dose). Samples were collected from patients receiving a first single dose (2.5 mg/kg), and up to 14 days later after repeated dosing. In mice, after CsA dosing (12.5-200 mg/kg) by oral gavage, CsA levels in blood and tissue (spleen, kidney) were determined and CN activity was measured in spleen and kidney. Results In humans, peak CsA levels of 800-2285 microg/L at 1-2 hr produced 70-96% CN inhibition. Inhibition correlated closely with the rise and fall of CsA levels with no observable lag at the times sampled. Repeated doses showed similar CN inhibition to first dose, with no significant adaptation. In mice, CsA peaked at 1 hr in blood, spleen, and kidney, with higher concentrations in spleen and kidney than in blood. CN inhibition closely followed CsA concentrations/doses, and was greater in kidney than spleen. Conclusion Thus CsA induces partial CN inhibition that varies directly with the blood and tissue levels, and may be greater in some tissues due to higher drug accumulation. The high CsA concentrations and CN inhibition in kidney may be relevant to nephrotoxicity.
314 citations
TL;DR: Using C2 monitoring, the overall incidence of acute cellular rejection was lower compared with the C0 group, and the histological severity of acute rejections was shown to be significantly milder for the C2 group, indicative of good long-term prognosis.
Abstract: Background. A prospective, open-label, study was conducted at 29 centers in 9 countries, involving 307 de novo liver transplant patients to compare the clinical usefulness of monitoring 2-hr post-dose cyclosporine (CsA) levels (C 2 ) with conventional trough cyclosporine blood levels (pre-dose) (C 0 ). Methods. Neoral oral therapy was initiated at 15 mg/kg/ day and dose adjusted according to predetermined C 2 or C 0 target level ranges. The primary efficacy variable was treatment failure at 3 months, where evaluation was based on a composite endpoint of biopsy-proven rejection, treatment for rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal/discontinuation from the study. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Graft loss at 12 weeks (retransplantation or death) occurred in 6.8% C 2 and in 7.0% C 0 patients. Overall incidence of treated acute rejection was lower for C 2 (23.6%) than C 0 patients (31.6%) (P=0.144, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel [CMH] test). In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative patients, the incidence of rejection in the C 2 group was significantly less than in the C 0 group (21.2% vs. 33.0%; P<0.05), whereas in HCV-positive patients, the rejection rate was similar in both groups (26.7% for C 2 group vs. 27.3% for C 0 group: P=0.81). C 2 patients (n=16) who reached minimum target CsA levels by day 3 had a notably low incidence of rejection (12.5%), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of rejection in C 0 patients, irrespective of time to reach target level. For biopsy-proven acute rejections (21.6% for C 2 vs. 30.4% for C 0 ), the incidence of moderate and severe histological diagnosis was significantly lower in the C 2 group than in the C 0 group (47% vs. 73%; P=0.01). Safety profiles were similar between the two groups, with few patient withdrawals due to adverse events (9.5% for C 2 ; 7.0% for C 0 ). Conclusions. Using C 2 monitoring, the overall incidence of acute cellular rejection was lower compared with the C 0 group, and the histological severity of acute rejections was shown to be significantly milder for the C 2 group, indicative of good long-term prognosis. These data demonstrate that the use of C 2 monitoring is superior to C 0 and results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection without detrimental effect on the drug safety profile.
183 citations
Journal Article•
TL;DR: In this article, the safety profile of Neoral dose adjustment using cyclosporine trough levels (C0) compared with levels obtained 2 h after the morning dose (C2) was assessed.
Abstract: To assess the safety profile of Neoral dose adjustment using cyclosporine (CsA) trough levels (C0) compared with levels obtained 2 h after the morning dose (C2), 30 stable adult heart transplant patients 1 yr or more after surgery were converted from Sandimmune to Neoral. After a baseline visit (before conversion), initial follow-up included two visits (2 and 4-6 wk after conversion). After the first visit, patients were randomized to Group I (C0: 100-200 ng/ml) or Group II (C2: 200-400 ng/ml). Abbreviated pharmacokinetics were obtained for the estimation of the AUC0-4 h. Renal function was assessed by serum creatinine and the cimetidine-modified creatinine clearance. C2 correlated better than C0 with the AUC0-4 h (r = 0.91 vs. 0.63). Initial Neoral dose (mg/kg/d) was similar in both groups (2.8 +/- 0.5 and 2.8 +/- 0.8), and was lower in Group II at the second visit (2.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.6, p = 0.0001). C2 levels decreased in Group II from 912 +/- 438 to 555 +/- 271 ng/ml (p = 0.01), without evidence of acute rejection on endomyocardial biopsies. After the second visit,-both groups were monitored with C2, and the range was increased to 300-600 ng/ml. At the last visit (additional follow-up of 5 +/- 1 months), Neoral dose (mg/kg/d) was reduced to 2.0 +/- 0.3 in Group I (p < 0.001) and 1.8 +/- 0.4 in Group II. Serum creatinine was lower in Group II at the second visit (138 +/- 59 vs. 168 +/- 37 mumol/L, p = 0.01) and was similar in both groups at the last visit. Neoral dose reduction based on C2 levels was not associated with acute rejection. The better correlation with the AUC0-4 h suggests that C2 may be more reliable than C0 for Neoral dose adjustment.
176 citations