Decision-Making and Offender Supervision
Citations
42 citations
20 citations
Cites background from "Decision-Making and Offender Superv..."
...More broadly, the structure and use of community supervision in Europe is widely vari able (Boone & Herzog-Evans, 2013)....
[...]
...Some nations, in cluding France, Belgium, Spain, and Italy, have specialized sentencing implementation courts to oversee release decisions and supervision (Boone & Herzog-Evans, 2013)....
[...]
10 citations
9 citations
Cites background from "Decision-Making and Offender Superv..."
...…detention, or alternatives to detention, these decisions are influenced by the characteristics of the offender, organizational aspects such as time constraints, and the type of information made available by other actors, for example, police or probation staff (Boone and Herzog-Evans, 2013: 63–67)....
[...]
...Our definition of relevant information drew upon factors that were identified in a previous review of influences of decision-making (Boone and Herzog-Evans, 2013)....
[...]
...In relation to sentencing in general, understood as a human and social process, the factors that influence decision making are broadly summarized as being related to the offender, the decision maker and/or organizational or cultural factors (Boone and Herzog-Evans, 2013: 73–76)....
[...]
...A comparison of the legal procedures of these countries involved in the COST Action showed that extreme variations exist in procedures, extent of discretion and outcomes in relation to breach and recall (Boone and Herzog-Evans, 2013; for recall so also European Journal of Probation 4(1))....
[...]
...…are contingent on factors primarily associated with the offender; the use of risk assessments is prominent and increasing, the social situation (e.g. housing, income) is important and the offender’s previous behavior has also been shown to be factor (Boone and Herzog-Evans, 2013: 82–86)....
[...]
7 citations
References
1,520 citations
601 citations
560 citations
386 citations
278 citations