scispace - formally typeset

Book

Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples

01 Jan 1999-

Abstract: Foreword Introduction 1. Imperialism, History, Writing and Theory 2. Research through Imperial Eyes 3. Colonizing Knowledges 4. Research Adventures on Indigenous Land 5. Notes from Down Under 6. The Indigenous People's Project: Setting a New Agenda 7. Articulating an Indigenous Research Agenda 8. Twenty-Five Indigenous Projects 9. Responding to the Imperatives of an Indigenous Agenda: A Case Study of Maori 10. Towards Developing Indigenous Methodologies: Kaupapa Maori Research 11. Choosing the Margins: The Role of Research in Indigenous Struggles for Social Justice 12. Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research Conclusion: A Personal Journey Index
Topics: Indigenous education (73%), Indigenous (65%), Traditional knowledge (56%), Colonialism (51%)
Citations
More filters

01 Jan 2005-
Abstract: The global community of qualitative researchers is midway between two extremes, searching for a new middle, moving in several different directions at the same time. Mixed methodologies and calls for scientifically based research, on the one side, renewed calls for social justice inquiry from the critical social science tradition on the other. In the methodological struggles of the 1970s and 1980s, the very existence of qualitative research was at issue. In the new paradigm war, “every overtly social justice-oriented approach to research . . . is threatened with de-legitimization by the government-sanctioned, exclusivist assertion of positivism . . . as the ‘gold standard’ of educational research” (Wright, 2006, pp. 799–800). The evidence-based research movement, with its fixed standards and guidelines for conducting and evaluating qualitative inquiry, sought total domination: one shoe fits all (Cannella & Lincoln, Chapter 5, this volume; Lincoln, 2010). The heart of the matter turns on issues surrounding the politics and ethics of evidence and the value of qualitative work in addressing matters of equity and social justice (Torrance, Chapter 34, this volume). In this introductory chapter, we define the field of qualitative research, then navigate, chart, and review the history of qualitative research in the human disciplines. This will allow us to locate this handbook and its contents within their historical moments. (These historical moments are somewhat artificial; they are socially constructed, quasi-historical, and overlapping conventions. Nevertheless, they permit a “performance” of developing ideas. They also facilitate an increasing sensitivity to and sophistication about the pitfalls and promises of ethnography and qualitative research.) A conceptual framework for reading the qualitative research act as a multicultural, gendered process is presented. We then provide a brief introduction to the chapters, concluding with a brief discussion of qualitative research. We will also discuss the threats to qualitative human-subject research from the methodological conservatism movement, which was noted in our Preface. As indicated there, we use the metaphor of the bridge to structure what follows. This volume provides a bridge between historical moments, politics, the decolonization project, research methods, paradigms, and communities of interpretive scholars.

3,057 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Michael Ungar1Institutions (1)
Abstract: Summary Findings from a 14 site mixed methods study of over 1500 youth globally support four propositions that underlie a more culturally and contextually embedded understanding of resilience: 1) there are global, as well as culturally and contextually specific aspects to young people’s lives that contribute to their resilience; 2) aspects of resilience exert differing amounts of influence on a child’s life depending on the specific culture and context in which resilience is realized; 3) aspects of children’s lives that contribute to resilience are related to one another in patterns that reflect a child’s culture and context; 4) tensions between individuals and their cultures and contexts are resolved in ways that reflect highly specific relationships between aspects of resilience. The implications of this cultural and contextual understanding of resilience to interventions with at-risk populations are discussed.

1,282 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2003-Action Research
Abstract: Members of the editorial board of Action Research responded to the question, `Why action research?' Based on their responses and the authors' own experiences as action researchers, this article examines common themes and commitments among action researchers as well as exploring areas of disagreement and important avenues for future exploration. We also use this opportunity to welcome readers of this new journal and to introduce them to members of the editorial board.

977 citations


Cites background from "Decolonizing Methodologies: Researc..."

  • ...’ There is also work to be done in articulating inclusive theoretical foundations that build more extensively on indigenous knowledge systems (see for example Hermes, 1999; Smith, 1999), feminist theories (Brydon-Miller, Maguire & McIntyre, in press; Morawski, 2001), postcolonial (Bhabha, 1994; McClintock, Mufti & Shohat, 1997) or critical race theories (Crenshaw, Gotanda, Peller & Thomas, 1995; Delgado & Stefancic, 2000; Parker, Deyhle & Villenas, 1999)....

    [...]

  • ...…be done in articulating inclusive theoretical foundations that build more extensively on indigenous knowledge systems (see for example Hermes, 1999; Smith, 1999), feminist theories (Brydon-Miller, Maguire & McIntyre, in press; Morawski, 2001), postcolonial (Bhabha, 1994; McClintock, Mufti &…...

    [...]


Journal ArticleDOI
Eve Tuck1Institutions (1)
Abstract: In this open letter, Eve Tuck calls on communities, researchers, and educators to reconsider the long-term impact of "damage-centered" research—research that intends to document peoples' pain and brokenness to hold those in power accountable for their oppression. This kind of research operates with a flawed theory of change: it is often used to leverage reparations or resources for marginalized communities yet simultaneously reinforces and reinscribes a one-dimensional notion of these people as depleted, ruined, and hopeless. Tuck urges communities to institute a moratorium on damage-centered research to reformulate the ways research is framed and conducted and to reimagine how findings might be used by, for, and with communities.

885 citations


Network Information
Related Papers (5)
01 Dec 1994, British Journal of Educational Studies

Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln

01 Jan 1994

Homi K. Bhabha

01 Jan 1961

Frantz Fanon

01 Jan 1952

Frantz Fanon

Performance
Metrics
No. of citations received by the Paper in previous years
YearCitations
20229
2021532
2020652
2019630
2018572
2017551