Deep time course proteomics of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2-infected human lung epithelial cells (Calu-3) reveals strong induction of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression by SARS-CoV-2 in contrast to SARS-CoV
Summary (1 min read)
Introduction
- In late 2019, first cases of severe pneumonia of unknown origin were reported in Wuhan, China.
- Shortly afterwards a new coronavirus was discovered as the causative agent and named SARS-CoV-2 and the related disease COVID-19.
- The virus turned out to be highly contagious and caused a world-wide pandemic, which is still ongoing and has already led to the death of > 2,900,000 humans worldwide.
- Other human lung cells lines, like A549, are only susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection upon overexpression of the SARS-CoV receptor ACE2 (6) which was recently found to be an interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) (7) .
- In total, 8391 proteins were identified, 7478 of which could be reliably quantified across the experiment.
Cell culture and infection
- Calu-3 cells (ATCC HTB-55) were cultivated in EMEM containing 10 % FCS, 2 mM L-Gln and non-essential amino acids.
- Medium was removed and cells were infected with SARS-CoV (strain Hong Kong) or SARS-CoV-2 (hCoV-19/Italy/INMI1-isl/2020 (National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy, GISAID Accession EPI_ISL_410545) at an MOI of 5.
- After one hour post infection (p.i.) cells were washed with PBS and fresh medium was added.
- Cells were washed with PBS and prepared for proteomics as described below.
- Additionally, triplicate mock samples per time point were taken.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
- Supernatants were extracted using the QIAamp Sample preparation for proteomics.
- Afterwards, 200 µL of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were added and cells were incubated at room temperature for 3 min.
- For the correction of predicted peptide spectral libraries, a pooled sample was measured using gas-phase separation (8 x 100 Th) with 25 x 4 Window placement was optimised using Skyline (Version 4.2.0) (11) .
- The single-run data were analysed using the corrected library with fixed mass tolerances of 10 ppm for MS1 and 20 ppm for MS² spectra with enabled "RT profiling" using the "robust LC (high accuracy)" quantification strategy.
- Proteins which were not quantified in at least 2/3rd of all samples were removed, and remaining missing values were replaced from a normal distribution (width 0.3, down shift 1.8).
Results
- Proteome analysis of SARS-CoV-and SARS-CoV-2-infected human lung epithelial cell line Calu-3 was conducted at 2, 6, 10 and 24 h p.i. including time-matched mock controls.
- Another cluster consisting of proteins with virus-specific time-course-dependent upregulation was found to be (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
- The low coverage of this pathway could explain at least partially the discrepancy.
- The authors therefore hypothesize that the enhanced expression of the M protein of SARS-CoV reduces the induction of ISG expression in infected cells in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 and so contributes to the varying IFN sensitivity of both viruses.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
References
32,980 citations
9,231 citations
6,229 citations
5,284 citations
5,165 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. what is the p-value of the ribonucleoprotein 225 complex?
The 221 network revealed high connectivity among proteins related to either innate immunity 222(mainly interferon type The authorsignalling), exocytosis, including proteins related to platelet 223 degranulation (adjusted p-value: 0.01, e.g. FGB, FGG, FN1, PLG and PSAP) or 224 mitochondria-associated proteins including many members of the ribonucleoprotein 225 complex related to mtDNA expression.
Q3. What is the role of the M protein in the induction of IFNs?
it was 282 discovered that overexpression of the M protein from SARS-CoV-2 in human cells 283 inhibits the production of type The authorand III IFNs induced by dsRNA-sensing via direct 284 interaction with RIG-I (DDX58) and reduces the induction of ISGs after Sendai virus 285 (SEV) infection and poly (I:C) transfection (33, 37).
Q4. How many proteins were upregulated in the sample?
The expression of 2642 human proteins differed significantly between the sample 184 groups (ANOVA, FDR = 0.05), which was reduced to 261 proteins using a post-hoc 185 test (FDR = 0.05) when only proteins with at least one significant pairwise difference 186 in an infected cell with its time-matched mock control were kept.
Q5. What was the ionization of the peptides?
Peptides were ionized using 136 electrospray with a stainless steel emitter, I.D. 30 µm (Proxeon, Odense, Denmark) at 137 a spray voltage of 2.0 kV and a heated capillary temperature of 275°C.
Q6. How many proteins are related to the immune response?
Out of the five 192 clusters two clusters (up-regulated 2 h p.i. and down-regulated 6 h p.i.) revealed no 193 significantly enriched GO terms but among others contained several proteins related 194 to immune response such as OAS1, INAVA and NFΚBIB.
Q7. What is the role of ACE2 in the immune response?
It must also 268 be noted that the influence of ACE2 overexpression, which was used by Stukalov et 269 al. to turn A549 into a permissive cell line, on the immune response is unknown, and 270 recently it has been shown that ACE2 is an ISG itself (7).
Q8. What was the RT strategy used for the single-run data?
The single-run data were analysed using the 149 corrected library with fixed mass tolerances of 10 ppm for MS1 and 20 ppm for MS² 150 spectra with enabled “RT profiling” using the “robust LC (high accuracy)” 151 quantification strategy.
Q9. What is the role of the M protein in the induction of ISGs?
The authors therefore 288 hypothesize that the enhanced expression of the M protein of SARS-CoV reduces the 289 induction of ISG expression in infected cells in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 and so 290 contributes to the varying IFN sensitivity of both viruses.
Q10. What was the false discovery rate for precursor 152?
The false discovery rate was set to 0.01 for precursor 152 identifications and proteins were grouped according to their respective genes.
Q11. What are the common viral proteins?
The majority of viral proteins including nucleoprotein, 179 spike glycoprotein, ORF3a, ORF7a and ORF9a are expressed in equal amounts upon 180 infection with both viruses.
Q12. How many proteins were grouped according to their expression profiles?
The remaining infection-related proteins were grouped using hierarchical 190 clustering according to their expression profiles, and the respective main clusters were 191 analysed for enriched gene ontology terms using ClueGO (Figure 2).
Q13. How many MOIs are favored by SARS-CoV-2?
It was shown before that ISGs and IFN can be detected 260 upon infection of A549-ACE2 and Calu-3 cells with SARS-CoV-2 and that higher 261 MOIs favour interferon induction (32, 33).
Q14. What is the significance of the meta-analysis?
This meta-analysis 271 demonstrates that proteome coverage is still a limitation which impedes intra-study 272 cross-comparisons due to missing values.
Q15. What was the result of the interaction network?
an interaction network of all infection-related proteins from this 220 study was constructed using STRING ((22), https://string-db.org/)
Q16. What is the correlation between ISG expression and disease severity?
it was 253 demonstrated that ISG expression is induced in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in 254 general and that the increase of ISG expression, including Mx1, has a negative 255 correlation with disease severity (29).
Q17. What was the p-value of the gene ontology?
Gene ontology enrichment of 163 differentially expressed proteins was analysed using the ClueGO app (Version 2.5.7) 164 implemented in Cytoscape (Version 3.8.2) with a Bonferroni-adjusted p-value 165 threshold of 0.05 (12, 17, 18).