Delayed neutrino-driven supernova explosions aided by the standing accretion-shock instability
Citations
971 citations
646 citations
575 citations
499 citations
Cites background from "Delayed neutrino-driven supernova e..."
...One model allows for considerable contribution from the SASI engine, a current focus of many supernova groups (Blondin et al. 2003, Burrows et al. 2007, Bruenn et al. 2009, Scheck et al. 2008, Marek & Janka 2009)....
[...]
481 citations
Cites background or result from "Delayed neutrino-driven supernova e..."
...These have been shown (see for example Miller et al. (1993), Herant et al. (1994), Burrows et al. (1995) and Janka and Müller (1996)) to increase the neutrino heating efficiency and help to understand aspherical explosions, see for example Bruenn et al. (2006) and Marek and Janka (2009)....
[...]
...…neutrino spectra from these artificially induced explosions in spherical symmetry are in general agreement with the neutrino spectra from axially-symmetric neutrino driven core collapse supernova models that explode without artificially modified reaction rates (see Marek and Janka (2009))....
[...]
References
3,649 citations
"Delayed neutrino-driven supernova e..." refers methods in this paper
...…M⊙ progenitor from Woosley et al. (2002), for which we show results from a continuation of the model run published by Buras et al. (2006b), all core-collapse and supernova calculations in this work are based on the 15 M⊙ progenitor s15s7b2 from Woosley & Weaver (1995) and are listed in Table 1....
[...]
...In this work we considered a 15 M⊙ progenitor (s15s7b2 of Woosley & Weaver 1995) and an 11.2 M⊙ model (Woosley et al. 2002)....
[...]
...We study here a 15 M⊙ model (s15s7b2 from Woosley & Weaver 1995) which is frequently used in previous and present core-collapse studies because it can be considered as representative of stars in a larger mass interval....
[...]
1,981 citations
"Delayed neutrino-driven supernova e..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Buras et al. (2006b) observed a similar situation in their 180-degree simulation of the collapse and post-bounce evolution of a (non-rotating) 11.2 M⊙ progenitor from Woosley et al. (2002)....
[...]
...In this work we considered a 15 M⊙ progenitor (s15s7b2 of Woosley & Weaver 1995) and an 11.2 M⊙ model (Woosley et al. 2002)....
[...]
...Investigated models Except for a simulation with an 11.2 M⊙ progenitor from Woosley et al. (2002), for which we show results from a continuation of the model run published by Buras et al. (2006b), all core-collapse and supernova calculations in this work are based on the 15 M⊙ progenitor s15s7b2…...
[...]
1,188 citations
"Delayed neutrino-driven supernova e..." refers background or methods or result in this paper
...They performed their simulations with the nuclear EoS of Shen et al. (1998), which is significantly stiffer than the Lattimer & Swesty (1991) EoS, though fairly similar to the Hillebrandt & Wolff EoS (Marek et al., in preparation; see also Janka et al. 2007)....
[...]
...…one hand, and 2D models without rotation on the other, in which two different equations of state (EoSs) for supernova matter are used, namely the Lattimer & Swesty (1991) EoS with a soft nuclear phase and the Hillebrandt, Wolff, & Nomoto (1984; see also Hillebrandt & Wolff 1985) EoS with a…...
[...]
...The positive trend towards a SASI-supported, neutrino-driven runaway late after bounce might be linked to a (relatively) soft equation of state for neutron star matter, like the EoS of Lattimer & Swesty (1991) used by us....
[...]
...All these results were obtained with the EoS of Lattimer & Swesty (1991)....
[...]
...Since we describe gravitational effects by the effective relativistic potential, our neutron stars are more compact (in particular with the softer EoS of Lattimer & Swesty 1991) than those in the Newtonian simulations of the Tucson group....
[...]
1,024 citations
854 citations
"Delayed neutrino-driven supernova e..." refers methods in this paper
...In case of the LS-EoS the maximum gravitational mass is 1.84 M⊙, whereas it is 2.21 M⊙ for the HW-EoS, which are both compatible with measured neutron star masses (Lattimer & Prakash 2007)....
[...]