scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Delirium and Mortality in Critically Ill Children: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Pediatric Delirium.

TL;DR: The frequency of delirium in critically ill children, its duration, associated risk factors, and effect on in-hospital outcomes, including mortality are described, with a strong and independent predictor of mortality.
Abstract: Objectives:Delirium occurs frequently in adults and is an independent predictor of mortality. However, the epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric delirium are not well-characterized. The primary objectives of this study were to describe the frequency of delirium in critically ill children, its durat

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Delirium and Mortality in Critically Ill Children: Epidemiology and
Outcomes of Pediatric Delirium
Chani Traube, MD
*
,
Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Gabrielle Silver, MD
*
,
Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Linda M. Gerber, PhD,
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Savneet Kaur, MBBS,
Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Elizabeth A. Mauer, MS,
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Abigail Kerson, BA,
(no department – medical student), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Christine Joyce, MD, and
Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
Bruce M. Greenwald, MD
Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Abstract
Objective—Delirium occurs frequently in adults, and is an independent predictor of mortality.
However, the epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric delirium are not well-characterized. The
primary objectives of this study were to describe the incidence of delirium in critically ill children,
its duration, associated risk factors, and effect on in-hospital outcomes, including mortality.
Secondary objectives included determination of delirium subtype, and effect of delirium on
duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and length of hospital stay (LOS).
Design—Prospective longitudinal cohort study.
Corresponding Author: Chani Traube, MD, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68
th
Street, M-508, New York, NY 10065, (212)
746-3056, chr9008@med.cornell.edu.
*
Drs. Traube and Silver contributed equally to this manuscript.
Name of institution where work performed: NY Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College
Address for reprints: Reprints will not be ordered.
Disclosures: All authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.
Copyright form disclosure: Dr. Traube received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Greenwald
received funding from legal firms for expert testimony. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential
conflicts of interest.
HHS Public Access
Author manuscript
Crit Care Med
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 May 01.
Published in final edited form as:
Crit Care Med
. 2017 May ; 45(5): 891–898. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002324.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Setting—Urban academic tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Patients—All consecutive admissions from September 2014 through August 2015.
Intervention—Children were screened for delirium twice daily throughout their ICU stay.
Measurements and Main Results—Of 1547 consecutive patients, delirium was diagnosed in
267 (17%), and lasted a median of two days (IQR 1,5). Seventy-eight percent of children with
delirium developed it within the first three PICU days. Most cases of delirium were of the
hypoactive (46%) and mixed (45%) subtypes; only 8% of delirium episodes were characterized as
hyperactive delirium. In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of delirium included age ≤2
years, developmental delay, severity of illness, prior coma, mechanical ventilation, and receipt of
benzodiazepines and anticholinergics. PICU LOS was increased in children with delirium
(adjusted relative LOS 2.3, CI= 2.1, 2.5, p<0.001), as was duration of MV (median 4 vs. 1 day,
p<0.001). Delirium was a strong and independent predictor of mortality (adjusted OR 4.39, CI=
1.96–9.99, p<0.001).
Conclusions—Delirium occurs frequently in critically ill children and is independently
associated with mortality. Some in-hospital risk factors for delirium development are modifiable.
Interventional studies are needed to determine best practices to limit delirium exposure in at-risk
children.
Keywords
delirium; pediatric; mortality; epidemiology; critical care; intensive care
Introduction
Delirium is a frequent and serious complication of critical illness, and has been linked to
increased mortality, prolongation and complication of hospitalization, and long-term
disability(1,2). An extensive literature exists describing the incidence, duration, risk factors,
subtypes, and outcomes of delirium in adults, but there are few prospective longitudinal
studies in critically ill children that describe the natural history of pediatric delirium (PD)(3–
6).
In this study, we describe a cohort of children admitted to a single pediatric intensive care
unit (PICU) over a calendar year. Our objective was to screen each child for delirium daily,
from PICU admission through discharge, to determine incidence of delirium, time to onset,
duration and fluctuation of clinical manifestations, phenotype of delirium, associated risk
factors, and effect of delirium on in-hospital outcome measures (including mortality, length
of stay (LOS), and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). This is one of several planned
analyses involving this cohort of patients, and all data described here are novel and have not
been published elsewhere. A subset of these patients were included in an analysis of the
effect of PD on hospital costs(7).
Materials and Methods
The Weill Cornell Medical College Institutional Review Board approved this observational,
minimal risk study with waiver of requirement for informed consent. This prospective
Traube et al.
Page 2
Crit Care Med
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 May 01.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

longitudinal study took place in an urban, academic, tertiary care, mixed PICU. All patients
admitted to the PICU service for at least 24 hours between September 1, 2014 and August
31, 2015 were included.
Consistent with our PICU standard, each child was screened for delirium twice daily by the
bedside nurse, at 6 am and 6 pm, using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium
(CAPD)(8). This is also consistent with the recent position paper published by the European
Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC), recommending use of CAPD
to assess for pediatric delirium (grade of recommendation = A) every 8–12 hours(9). The
CAPD is a well-validated observational 8-item tool that can reliably distinguish between
pain, agitation, residual sedation, and delirium(8,9). A CAPD score of 9 or higher represents
a positive screen; the diagnosis is then confirmed by the physician(8). Any developmentally
delayed child who screened positive for delirium on the CAPD subsequently had the
diagnosis of delirium confirmed (or refuted) by an intensivist or psychiatrist prior to being
classified as delirious. (The clinician had to establish an alteration from mental status at pre-
hospital baseline, in order to ensure that static encephalopathy – i.e.: the underlying
developmental delay – was not confused with delirium).
Each child was assigned a daily status: “comatose” (patients with a Richmond Agitation
Sedation Scale (RASS) score of −4 or −5, who are unarousable to verbal stimulation(10,11),
and therefore impossible to assess for delirium), “delirious” (CAPD score ≥9 with diagnosis
confirmed by physician), or “normal” mental status (i.e.: delirium-free and coma-free
(DFCF)). If an assessment opportunity was missed (due to noncompliance with screening
protocol), status for that day was designated as “unknown”.
All patients who were diagnosed with delirium at least once during their PICU stay were
designated “ever delirious” and compared to those patients who were never delirious. Time
to onset of delirium was defined as the number of days from PICU admission to the first
diagnosis of delirium. Duration of delirium was defined as the number of days spent
delirious during the PICU stay. Recurrent delirium (which frequently is a warning sign of
new inter-current illness) was defined as a second episode of delirium during a single
hospital admission, following a minimum of 24 hours spent with normal mental status
(DFCF).
Delirium subtype was determined by psychomotor activity and level of alertness, as assessed
by the RASS, over the 24 hour period(11, 12). The frequency of RASS assessment was
dependent on patient’s acuity level, and ranged from hourly to every 4 hours. The RASS
score ranges from −5 (unarousable), through 0 (alert and calm), to +4 (combative)(10).
Delirious children with RASS scores from 0 to −3 were designated as having hypoactive
delirium. Delirious children with RASS scores from 0 to +4 were designated as having
hyperactive delirium. Children with RASS scores crossing zero (including both negative and
positive numbers) were designated as having mixed delirium.
Demographic data, including age, sex, primary diagnosis, pre-existing medical conditions,
severity of illness (as measured by Pediatric index of Mortality-3 (PIM3) score(13), and
divided into tertiles), and developmental status were collected on admission. As
Traube et al.
Page 3
Crit Care Med
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 May 01.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

developmentally delayed children are at increased risk for developing delirium during
critical illness, it is important to include these children in delirium research (8).
“Developmental delay” was defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC)
of 4 (severe disability; conscious but dependent on others for daily support because of
impaired brain function) at pre-hospital baseline (14).
Individual patient data, including Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD-2)
score(15) (after excluding neurologic component so as not to allow the presence of delirium
to affect daily organ dysfunction score), RASS scores(10, 12), CAPD scores(8), need for
respiratory support, and exposure to medications by categories (including narcotics,
benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, anticholinergics, vasoactive medications, and
neuroleptics), as well as other variables were collected daily. Upon discharge from hospital,
mortality, duration of MV, PICU LOS, and hospital LOS were recorded.
Statistical Analysis
Demographic and clinical data were reported as N (%) and median (IQR) for categorical and
continuous variables, respectively. Bivariate relationships between relevant variables and
delirium development (ever vs. never delirious) were analyzed by Chi-Square/Fisher’s Exact
tests, as appropriate. A conservative approach was taken towards unknown days, presuming
them to be non-delirious, in order to avoid overestimating delirium presence. Multivariable
logistic regression, modeling delirium development (ever/never), was constructed from bi-
directional stepwise selection based on Akaike information criterion (AIC) of all factors
from bivariate analyses that reached significance of 0.1. A multivariable linear regression
was constructed to model PICU LOS, using same approach of the following relevant risk
factors: delirium development, mechanical ventilation, probability of mortality, age,
developmental delay, and pre-existing medical condition. Because LOS was skewed, LOS
was log-transformed prior to modeling. A final multivariable logistic regression was
constructed to assess the independent effect of delirium development on in-hospital
mortality after controlling for severity of illness on admission. Statistical tests were two-
sided with significance evaluated at 0.05 alpha level. Analyses were performed with R
version 3.2.4 for Windows 64-bit.
Results
Descriptives of Patient Population
Our cohort included 1,547 unique admissions, and 7,591 study days. Demographic and
clinical patient information is presented in Table 1. Fifty-seven percent of patients were
male, 59% were under age five, and 21% were developmentally delayed. Forty-six percent
were admitted with a primary diagnosis of respiratory failure, and 31% were admitted for
post-operative care. Forty-two percent of patients were mechanically ventilated during their
PICU stay. Forty-three percent were prescribed narcotics, 29% benzodiazepines, and 41%
corticosteroids during their PICU course. Only seven percent of patients were on vasoactive
medications. The average probability of mortality (POM) as calculated by PIM3 was 2%,
with a median of 1%. Median PICU LOS was three days.
Traube et al.
Page 4
Crit Care Med
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 May 01.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Delirium Incidence and Associated Risk Factors
Delirium was diagnosed in 267 patients, for an incidence of 17.3%. Of the 7,591 patient
study days, 1,259 were days with delirium, for a prevalence of 16.6% in this cohort. 566
patient days (7.5%) were classified as days with coma (almost always medication-induced),
and 5671 patient days (74.7%) as days with normal mental status (DFCF). Only 95 patient
days (<2%) were classified as unknown, due to missed opportunities for delirium screening.
In bivariate analyses(Table 1), pre-existing factors associated with diagnosis of delirium
included age ≤2 years, developmental delay, pre-existing medical condition, and severity of
illness. PICU-related factors linked to the development of delirium included mechanical
ventilation (MV), coma, and receipt of benzodiazepines, narcotics, corticosteroids,
anticholinergics, and vasoactive medications.
In multivariable modeling, independent predictors of delirium included age ≤2 years,
developmental delay, severity of illness, mechanical ventilation, ever coma, and
administration of benzodiazepines and anticholinergics(Table 2). After step-wise selection,
narcotics fell out of the final model. The adjusted odds for delirium diagnosis were more
than five times greater in patients who ever received benzodiazepines, as compared to those
who never received benzodiazepines (adjusted OR=5.2, CI=3.7,7.5, p<0.001)(Table 2).
Description of Delirium
In the 267 patients who were delirious, duration of delirium ranged from one to 52 days,
with an interquartile range of 1–5 days, and a median of two days(Figure 1a). Of those who
were ever delirious, 77.5% were diagnosed with delirium within the first three PICU days,
and 65.5% within the first 48 hours of admission(Figure 1b). Twenty-seven percent
experienced recurrent delirium, with 71 patients experiencing at least 2 discrete episodes of
delirium (range 2–14 delirium episodes in patients with recurrent delirium).
When assessed by phenotype, only eight percent (8.4%) of patient days with delirium were
hyperactive. Forty-six percent (46.4%) of patient days with delirium were hypoactive, and
45.2% were mixed-type.
PELOD Scores (even after discounting neurologic component) were significantly higher on
days with delirium, as compared to PELOD scores on days without delirium (mean 3.9 vs
2.2, p<0.001).
Effect on In-Hospital Outcomes
PICU and hospital LOS were both increased in children with delirium (median 7 vs. 3 days,
p<0.001, and 8 vs. 3 days, p<0.001, respectively). After controlling for relevant confounders,
including probability of mortality and mechanical ventilation, children with delirium
demonstrated a more than two-times longer PICU LOS (adjusted relative LOS=2.3,
CI=2.1,2.5, p<0.001)(Table 3). Duration of MV was associated with delirium status as well
(median 4 vs. 1 day(s) for those ever delirious as compared to MV children who were never
delirious(p<0.001)(Table 1). In-hospital mortality was significantly greater for children with
delirium (5.24% vs. 0.94%, p<0.001), even after controlling for POM on admission, with
adjusted OR for mortality of 4.39 (CI=1.96,9.99) for those ever delirious(p<0.001).
Traube et al.
Page 5
Crit Care Med
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 May 01.
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Benzodiazepines are an independent and modifiable risk factor for development of delirium in critically ill children, even after carefully controlling for time-dependent covariates, with a dose-response effect.
Abstract: Objectives:Benzodiazepine use may be associated with delirium in critically ill children. However, benzodiazepines remain the first-line sedative choice in PICUs. Objectives were to determine the temporal relationship between administration of benzodiazepines and delirium development, control for ti

93 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Delirium is common in patients in the pediatric CICU and is associated with longer length of stay and there may be opportunities for prevention of delirium by targeting modifiable risk factors, such as use of benzodiazepines.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children, including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility as discussed by the authors .
Abstract: A guideline that both evaluates current practice and provides recommendations to address sedation, pain, and delirium management with regard for neuromuscular blockade and withdrawal is not currently available.To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for critically ill infants and children, with specific attention to seven domains of care including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility.The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility Guideline Taskforce was comprised of 29 national experts who collaborated from 2009 to 2021 via teleconference and/or e-mail at least monthly for planning, literature review, and guideline development, revision, and approval. The full taskforce gathered annually in-person during the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress for progress reports and further strategizing with the final face-to-face meeting occurring in February 2020. Throughout this process, the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures Manual for Guidelines development was adhered to.Taskforce content experts separated into subgroups addressing pain/analgesia, sedation, tolerance/iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment (family presence and sleep hygiene), and early mobility. Subgroups created descriptive and actionable Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. An experienced medical information specialist developed search strategies to identify relevant literature between January 1990 and January 2020. Subgroups reviewed literature, determined quality of evidence, and formulated recommendations classified as "strong" with "we recommend" or "conditional" with "we suggest." Good practice statements were used when indirect evidence supported benefit with no or minimal risk. Evidence gaps were noted. Initial recommendations were reviewed by each subgroup and revised as deemed necessary prior to being disseminated for voting by the full taskforce. Individuals who had an overt or potential conflict of interest abstained from relevant votes. Expert opinion alone was not used in substitution for a lack of evidence.The Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility taskforce issued 44 recommendations (14 strong and 30 conditional) and five good practice statements.The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children. Main areas of focus included 1) need for the routine monitoring of pain, agitation, withdrawal, and delirium using validated tools, 2) enhanced use of protocolized sedation and analgesia, and 3) recognition of the importance of nonpharmacologic interventions for enhancing patient comfort and comprehensive care provision.

68 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: With heightened awareness, the pediatric intensivist can detect, treat, and prevent delirium in at-risk children.

64 citations


Cites background or methods or result from "Delirium and Mortality in Criticall..."

  • ...hypoactive and mixed-type delirium were most common (46% and 45%, respectively), whereas the hyperactive subtype was only found in 8% of patients.(7) This profile of delirium is consistent with observations of adults with critical illnesses....

    [...]

  • ...It is important to recognize that several risk factors are modifiable. factors associated with delirium – and delirium also causes increased LOS.7,25,33,34 To attempt to understand this relationship, an international study showed an increase in delirium rates after 5 days in the ICU (20% in children with LOS 5 days vs 38% in children with LOS >5 days, P<.001).39 Risk factors particular to children with congenital heart disease have been identified as well....

    [...]

  • ...Furthermore, the few studies that have been conducted to assess the duration of delirium suggest it is a relatively brief condition, with a median of 2 days.(7,33,34) A substantial portion (approximately one-third) of patients with early onset delirium will demonstrate recurrent episodes during their ICU stay....

    [...]

  • ...factors associated with delirium – and delirium also causes increased LOS.(7,25,33,34) To attempt to understand this relationship, an international study showed an increase in delirium rates after 5 days in the ICU (20% in children with LOS 5 days vs 38% in children with LOS >5 days, P<....

    [...]

  • ...A prospective observational study (n 5 1540 children) used a multivariable model to demonstrate a 5-fold risk of delirium in children who were ever prescribed benzodiazepines (after controlling for severity of illness, developmental delay, mechanical ventilation, and other important confounders).(7) However, an assessment of the relationship between benzodiazepine use and delirium can be confounded by the fact that a child with hyperactive delirium could be prescribed benzodiazepines as a treatment of agitation....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Delirium is common in the PICu, particularly among patients with length of stay greater than or equal to 48 hours, and is independently associated with patient characteristics and PICU exposures, including benzodiazepines.
Abstract: Objectives:To determine risk factors and outcomes associated with delirium in PICU patients.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Setting:Thirty-two–bed PICU within a tertiary care academic children’s hospital.Patients:All children admitted to the PICU March 1, 2014, to October 1, 2016, with at least on

60 citations


Cites background or result from "Delirium and Mortality in Criticall..."

  • ...In a handful of studies, PICU delirium is associated with adverse outcomes, including longer ICU stay and increased mortality (13, 17)....

    [...]

  • ...In contrast to several adult and one pediatric study (13), we did not observe an independent association between delirium and mortality....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These guidelines provide a roadmap for developing integrated, evidence-based, and patient-centered protocols for preventing and treating pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients.
Abstract: Objective:To revise the “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Sustained Use of Sedatives and Analgesics in the Critically Ill Adult” published in Critical Care Medicine in 2002.Methods:The American College of Critical Care Medicine assembled a 20-person, multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task f

3,005 citations


"Delirium and Mortality in Criticall..." refers background in this paper

  • ...The first is the classification of delirium by subtype (hyperactive, hypoactive, and mixed), which has been intensively investigated in the adult literature(1,26,27)....

    [...]

  • ...Delirium is a frequent and serious complication of critical illness, and has been linked to increased mortality, prolongation and complication of hospitalization, and long-term disability(1,2)....

    [...]

  • ...Delirium Pathophysiology and Phenotype It is noteworthy that despite a prolific amount of research on delirium in adults, with thousands of articles published in peer-reviewed journals over the past decade, the pathophysiology is still incompletely understood, and there are few evidence-based treatment strategies(1)....

    [...]

  • ...It is important to note that, as in adults, only a minority of delirium was of the easily recognizable hyperactive subtype(1,25,26)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: RASS has high reliability and validity in medical and surgical, ventilated and nonventilated, and sedated and nonsedated adult ICU patients and is described as logical, easy to administer, and readily recalled.
Abstract: Sedative medications are widely used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Structured assessment of sedation and agitation is useful to titrate sedative medications and to evaluate agitated behavior, yet existing sedation scales have limitations. We measured inter-rater reliability and validity of a new 10-level (+4 “combative” to −5 “unarousable”) scale, the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS), in two phases. In phase 1, we demonstrated excellent (r = 0.956, lower 90% confidence limit = 0.948; κ = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.71, 0.75) inter-rater reliability among five investigators (two physicians, two nurses, and one pharmacist) in adult ICU patient encounters (n = 192). Robust inter-rater reliability (r = 0.922–0.983) (κ = 0.64–0.82) was demonstrated for patients from medical, surgical, cardiac surgery, coronary, and neuroscience ICUs, patients with and without mechanical ventilation, and patients with and without sedative medications. In validity testing, RASS correlated highly (r = 0.93)...

2,784 citations


"Delirium and Mortality in Criticall..." refers background or methods in this paper

  • ...Each child was assigned a daily status: “comatose” (patients with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of −4 or −5, who are unarousable to verbal stimulation(10,11), and therefore impossible to assess for delirium), “delirious” (CAPD score ≥9 with diagnosis confirmed by physician), or “normal” mental status (i....

    [...]

  • ...The RASS score ranges from −5 (unarousable), through 0 (alert and calm), to +4 (combative)(10)....

    [...]

  • ...Individual patient data, including Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD-2) score(15) (after excluding neurologic component so as not to allow the presence of delirium to affect daily organ dysfunction score), RASS scores(10, 12), CAPD scores(8), need for respiratory support, and exposure to medications by categories (including narcotics, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids, anticholinergics, vasoactive medications, and neuroleptics), as well as other variables were collected daily....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
14 Apr 2004-JAMA
TL;DR: Delirium was an independent predictor of higher 6-month mortality and longer hospital stay even after adjusting for relevant covariates including coma, sedatives, and analgesics in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
Abstract: ContextIn the intensive care unit (ICU), delirium is a common yet underdiagnosed form of organ dysfunction, and its contribution to patient outcomes is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine if delirium is an independent predictor of clinical outcomes, including 6-month mortality and length of stay among ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective cohort study enrolling 275 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients admitted to adult medical and coronary ICUs of a US university-based medical center between February 2000 and May 2001. Patients were followed up for development of delirium over 2158 ICU days using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.Main Outcome MeasuresPrimary outcomes included 6-month mortality, overall hospital length of stay, and length of stay in the post-ICU period. Secondary outcomes were ventilator-free days and cognitive impairment at hospital discharge.ResultsOf 275 patients, 51 (18.5%) had persistent coma and died in the hospital. Among the remaining 224 patients, 183 (81.7%) developed delirium at some point during the ICU stay. Baseline demographics including age, comorbidity scores, dementia scores, activities of daily living, severity of illness, and admission diagnoses were similar between those with and without delirium (P>.05 for all). Patients who developed delirium had higher 6-month mortality rates (34% vs 15%, P = .03) and spent 10 days longer in the hospital than those who never developed delirium (P<.001). After adjusting for covariates (including age, severity of illness, comorbid conditions, coma, and use of sedatives or analgesic medications), delirium was independently associated with higher 6-month mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-7.7; P = .008), and longer hospital stay (adjusted HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-3.0; P<.001). Delirium in the ICU was also independently associated with a longer post-ICU stay (adjusted HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3; P = .009), fewer median days alive and without mechanical ventilation (19 [interquartile range, 4-23] vs 24 [19-26]; adjusted P = .03), and a higher incidence of cognitive impairment at hospital discharge (adjusted HR, 9.1; 95% CI, 2.3-35.3; P = .002).ConclusionDelirium was an independent predictor of higher 6-month mortality and longer hospital stay even after adjusting for relevant covariates including coma, sedatives, and analgesics in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

2,590 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The intervention was associated with significant improvement in the degree of cognitive impairment among patients with cognitive impairment at admission and a reduction in the rate of use of sleep medications among all patients, suggesting that primary prevention of delirium is probably the most effective treatment strategy.
Abstract: Background Since in hospitalized older patients delirium is associated with poor outcomes, we evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy for the prevention of delirium. Methods We studied 852 patients 70 years of age or older who had been admitted to the general-medicine service at a teaching hospital. Patients from one intervention unit and two usual-care units were enrolled by means of a prospective matching strategy. The intervention consisted of standardized protocols for the management of six risk factors for delirium: cognitive impairment, sleep deprivation, immobility, visual impairment, hearing impairment, and dehydration. Delirium, the primary outcome, was assessed daily until discharge. Results Delirium developed in 9.9 percent of the intervention group, as compared with 15.0 percent of the usual-care group (matched odds ratio, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.92). The total number of days with delirium (105 vs. 161, P=0.02) and the total number of episodes (62 vs. 9...

2,411 citations


"Delirium and Mortality in Criticall..." refers background in this paper

  • ...By avoiding precipitating factors, particularly in high-risk subgroups, we may be able to decrease the delirium burden in children(24)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
11 Jun 2003-JAMA
TL;DR: This is the first sedation scale to be validated for its ability to detect changes in sedation status over consecutive days of ICU care, against constructs of level of consciousness and delirium, and correlated with the administered dose of sedative and analgesic medications.
Abstract: ContextGoal-directed delivery of sedative and analgesic medications is recommended as standard care in intensive care units (ICUs) because of the impact these medications have on ventilator weaning and ICU length of stay, but few of the available sedation scales have been appropriately tested for reliability and validity.ObjectiveTo test the reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).DesignProspective cohort study.SettingAdult medical and coronary ICUs of a university-based medical center.ParticipantsThirty-eight medical ICU patients enrolled for reliability testing (46% receiving mechanical ventilation) from July 21, 1999, to September 7, 1999, and an independent cohort of 275 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled for validity testing from February 1, 2000, to May 3, 2001.Main Outcome MeasuresInterrater reliability of the RASS, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Ramsay Scale (RS); validity of the RASS correlated with reference standard ratings, assessments of content of consciousness, GCS scores, doses of sedatives and analgesics, and bispectral electroencephalography.ResultsIn 290-paired observations by nurses, results of both the RASS and RS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability (weighted κ, 0.91 and 0.94, respectively), which were both superior to the GCS (weighted κ, 0.64; P<.001 for both comparisons). Criterion validity was tested in 411-paired observations in the first 96 patients of the validation cohort, in whom the RASS showed significant differences between levels of consciousness (P<.001 for all) and correctly identified fluctuations within patients over time (P<.001). In addition, 5 methods were used to test the construct validity of the RASS, including correlation with an attention screening examination (r = 0.78, P<.001), GCS scores (r = 0.91, P<.001), quantity of different psychoactive medication dosages 8 hours prior to assessment (eg, lorazepam: r = − 0.31, P<.001), successful extubation (P = .07), and bispectral electroencephalography (r = 0.63, P<.001). Face validity was demonstrated via a survey of 26 critical care nurses, which the results showed that 92% agreed or strongly agreed with the RASS scoring scheme, and 81% agreed or strongly agreed that the instrument provided a consensus for goal-directed delivery of medications.ConclusionsThe RASS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability and criterion, construct, and face validity. This is the first sedation scale to be validated for its ability to detect changes in sedation status over consecutive days of ICU care, against constructs of level of consciousness and delirium, and correlated with the administered dose of sedative and analgesic medications.

1,379 citations


"Delirium and Mortality in Criticall..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...Delirium subtype was determined by psychomotor activity and level of alertness, as assessed by the RASS, over the 24 hour period(11, 12)....

    [...]

  • ...Each child was assigned a daily status: “comatose” (patients with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of −4 or −5, who are unarousable to verbal stimulation(10,11), and therefore impossible to assess for delirium), “delirious” (CAPD score ≥9 with diagnosis confirmed by physician), or “normal” mental status (i....

    [...]

Related Papers (5)