Determinants of Environmental Efficiency in Bitter Gourd Production in Pakistani Punjab
01 Jan 2014-
TL;DR: In this article, the authors have made an attempt to determine possibility of a reduction in pesticide use and factors affecting pesticide use in bitter gourd production and found that the huge potential existed to reduce the use of environmental contaminating variables without sacrificing yield in BG production.
Abstract: In this research article, we have made an attempt to determine possibility of a reduction in pesticide use and factors affecting pesticide use in bitter gourd production. Stochastic production function frontier was used to determine technical efficiency and on the basis of this, input-oriented environmental efficiency was determined. Determinants of environmental efficiency were explored using OLS method. Results showed that the huge potential existed to reduce the use of environmental contaminating variables without sacrificing yield in bitter gourd production. Farming experience, tenancy, access to information and credit were significantly related with environmental efficiency in bitter gourd production. The findings have important policy recommendation that by strengthening agricultural extension services and capacity building of vegetable growers, higher environmental efficiency can be achieved in vegetable production.
Citations
More filters
01 Jan 1997
TL;DR: The strengths and weaknesses for estimating environmental efficiency of the methods applied are revealed; namely Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to estimate comprehensive environmental efficiency measures for Dutch dairy farms. The environmental efficiency scores are based on the nitrogen surplus, phosphate surplus and the total (direct and indirect) energy use of an unbalanced panel of dairy farms. We define environmental efficiency as the ratio of minimum feasible to observed use of multiple environmentally detrimental inputs, conditional on observed levels of output and the conventional inputs. We compare two methods for the calculation of efficiency; namely Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This paper reveals the strengths and weaknesses for estimating environmental efficiency of the methods applied. Both SFA and DEA can estimate environmental efficiency scores. The mean technical efficiency scores (output-oriented, SFA 89%, DEA 78%) and the mean comprehensive environmental efficiency scores (SFA 80%, DEA 52%) differ between the two methods. SFA allows hypothesis testing, and the monotonicity hypothesis is rejected for the specification including phosphate surplus. DEA can calculate environmental efficiency scores for all specifications, because regularity is imposed in this method.
101 citations
TL;DR: Results of logit model show that health cost, age, education below 8th grade, perception of temporary impact and health problems are important determinants of adopting PPE among the cotton pickers.
30 citations
Cites background from "Determinants of Environmental Effic..."
...Bakhsh (2012) and Bakhsh et al. (2014) find that farmers can attain the same productivity by reducing the pesticides as there exists environmental inefficiency in pesticide use....
[...]
01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, the stochastic translog frontier model was used to estimate the technical efficiency of vegetable production, based on the estimated frontier and technical inefficiency levels, and used the method developed by Reinhard, et al.
Abstract: Objective To analyze and estimate the environmental efficiency of China's vegetable production. Methods The stochastic translog frontier model was used to estimate the technical efficiency of vegetable production. Based on the estimated frontier and technical inefficiency levels, we used the method developed by Reinhard, et al.[1] to estimate the environmental efficiency. Pesticide and chemical fertilizer inputs were treated as environmentally detrimental inputs. Results From estimated results, the mean environmental efficiency for pesticide input was 69.7%, indicating a great potential for reducing pesticide use in China's vegetable production. In addition, substitution and output elasticities for vegetable farms were estimated to provide farmers with helpful information on how to reallocate input resources and improve efficiency. Conclusion There exists a great potential for reducing pesticide use in China's vegetable production.
5 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the environmental efficiency of 400 rice farms in the Mekong Delta using slack-based measure (SBM) data envelopment analysis (DEA) with considering the total amount of CO2-equivalent (CO2-eq) emissions in the rice field as undesirable output.
Abstract: . Le TL, Luu TTH, Huynh N, Chung RH. 2020. Environmental efficiency of rice production in Vietnam: An application of SBM-DEA with undesirable output. Biodiversitas 21: 2710-2715. In Vietnam, the agricultural sector is one of major sources of the country’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and over half of that comes from rice cultivation. This study evaluates the environmental efficiency of 400 rice farms in the Mekong Delta using slack-based measure (SBM) data envelopment analysis (DEA) with considering the total amount of CO2-equivalent (CO2-eq) emissions in the rice field as undesirable output. The findings revealed that the average environmental efficiency score of the farmers was very low, just only 0.461. Only 2.25% of the sample farms were environmentally efficient while majority of them (58%) obtained the efficiency values less than the mean indicating that their environmental efficiency needs to be further improved. The small rice farms were higher in environmental efficiency scores compared with large farms. The sample rice farmers who are members of agricultural cooperatives obtained a significantly higher environmental efficiency than the non-cooperative members. The estimated results of input and bad output excesses showed that about 1.35 tons of CO2-eq ha-1 could be reduced and an average of 54.18 kg N ha-1 could be saved in order to improve the environmental performance of rice production in the study area.
5 citations
Additional excerpts
...…were commonly applied in many previous studies related to evaluate the environmental efficiency of agricultural farms (Reinhard et al. 1999; Reinhard et al. 2000; Reinhard et al. 2002; Zhang and Xue 2005; Kiatpathomchai 2008; Abedullah et al. 2010; Bakhsh et al. 2014; Ullah and Perret 2014)....
[...]
...could cause environmental pollution were commonly applied in many previous studies related to evaluate the environmental efficiency of agricultural farms (Reinhard et al. 1999; Reinhard et al. 2000; Reinhard et al. 2002; Zhang and Xue 2005; Kiatpathomchai 2008; Abedullah et al. 2010; Bakhsh et al. 2014; Ullah and Perret 2014)....
[...]
TL;DR: In this article , a cross-sectional study was conducted on 580 farm households using multistage sampling technique to assess the prevalence and possible predictors of health hazards and their effects on health cost of pesticide applicators and non-applicators.
Abstract: Abstract The aim of the present study is to assess the prevalence and possible predictors of health hazards and their effects on health cost of pesticide applicators and non-applicators. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 580 farm households using multistage sampling technique. The pesticide applicators and non-applicators involved in cotton production were interviewers by the survey team. The prevalence of occupational hazards was higher among the pesticide applicators than non-applicators. Logit regression analysis revealed that the more educated, well trained workers were relatively less vulnerable. Similarly, personal protective measures such as wearing boots and protective handkerchief, and taking bath after pesticide application reduced probability of health risk. Prolonged exposure to pesticide, distance from hospital, and smoking habits were risk factors for development of occupational hazards among the pesticide applicators and non-applicators. The total mean score of health cost resulting from occupational hazards was significantly lower in pesticide non-applicators than pesticide applicators. Workers involved in pesticide application are at higher risk for developing occupational hazards that adversely affects general health and quality of life. The study urges policymakers to formulate programs for proper training of farm workers, encouraging the use of personal preventive measures and the provision of health facilities to farm workers. This will not only improve health of workers but also save undue expenses on medical treatment.
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define the disturbance term as the sum of symmetric normal and (negative) half-normal random variables, and consider various aspects of maximum-likelihood estimation for the coefficients of a production function with an additive disturbance term of this sort.
8,058 citations
6,067 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a stochastic frontier production function is defined for panel data on firms, in which the nonnegative technical inefficiency effects are assumed to be a function of firm-specific variables and time.
Abstract: A stochastic frontier production function is defined for panel data on firms, in which the non-negative technical inefficiency effects are assumed to be a function of firm-specific variables and time. The inefficiency effects are assumed to be independently distributed as truncations of normal distributions with constant variance, but with means which are a linear function of observable variables. This panel data model is an extension of recently proposed models for inefficiency effects in stochastic frontiers for cross-sectional data. An empirical application of the model is obtained using up to ten years of data on paddy farmers from an Indian village. The null hypotheses, that the inefficiency effects are not stochastic or do not depend on the farmer-specific variables and time of observation, are rejected for these data.
5,783 citations
"Determinants of Environmental Effic..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Taking the estimates of technical efficiency as dependent variable has been criticized by Battese and Coelli (1995) in the second stage analysis since, assumptions of independently and identically distribution of u is violated, so one cannot employ OLS for estimating determinants of technical…...
[...]
...Following Battese and Coelli (1995, 1992) stochastic frontier production function can be written as }exp{),( iiii uvxfy (1) Here iy is the production level of ith farmer, ix is a vector of inputs, indicates unknown parameters to be estimated. iv is a random error term with the assumptions…...
[...]
...Taking the estimates of technical efficiency as dependent variable has been criticized by Battese and Coelli (1995) in the second stage analysis since, assumptions of independently and identically distribution of u is violated, so one cannot employ OLS for estimating determinants of technical efficiency....
[...]
TL;DR: In this article, a stochastic frontier production function model for panel data is presented, for which the firm effects are an exponential function of time, and the best predictor for the technical efficiency of an individual firm at a particular time period is presented for this timevarying model.
Abstract: Frontier production functions are important for the prediction of technical efficiencies of individual firms in an industry. A stochastic frontier production function model for panel data is presented, for which the firm effects are an exponential function of time. The best predictor for the technical efficiency of an individual firm at a particular time period is presented for this time-varying model. An empirical example is presented using agricultural data for paddy farmers in a village in India.
2,884 citations
"Determinants of Environmental Effic..." refers background in this paper
...Following Battese and Coelli (1995, 1992) stochastic frontier production function can be written as }exp{),( iiii uvxfy (1) Here iy is the production level of ith farmer, ix is a vector of inputs, indicates unknown parameters to be estimated. iv is a random error term with the assumptions…...
[...]
TL;DR: Multilateral productivity comparisons of firms producing multiple outputs, some of which are undesirable, are obtained by making two modifications to the standard Farrell approach to efficiency measurement.
Abstract: Multilateral productivity comparisons of firms producing multiple outputs, some of which are undesirable, are obtained by making two modifications to the standard Farrell approach to efficiency measurement. The restriction that production technology satisfy strong disposability of outputs is relaxed to allow for the fact that undesirable outputs may be freely disposable, and the efficiency measures are modified to allow for an asymmetric treatment of desirable and undesirable outputs. Performance measures that satisfy these requirements are calculated as solutions to programming problems. The methodology is applied to a sample of mills producing paper and pollutants.
1,748 citations
"Determinants of Environmental Effic..." refers methods in this paper
...Environmental effects being undesirable output were first considered by Pittman (1983) and then applied by Fare et al. (1989, 1993) using environmental affects as undesirable output while estimating efficiency....
[...]