scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction

TL;DR: The ability of DLLME technique in the extraction of other organic compounds such as organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus pesticides and substituted benzene compounds were studied.
About: This article is published in Journal of Chromatography A.The article was published on 2006-05-26. It has received 2959 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Extraction (chemistry) & Aqueous two-phase system.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review focuses on the extra steps in sample preparation for application of DLLME in different matrixes such as food, biological fluids and solid samples and its applications in conjunction with different extraction techniques such as solid-phase extraction, solidification of floating organic drop and supercritical fluid extraction are summarized.

851 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factors and extraction recoveries were high and ranged between 789-1070 and 78.9-107%, respectively, while the linear range was wide and limit of detections were very low and were between 3 to 20 pg/mL for most of the analytes.

826 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss liquid-phase microextraction with the focus on extraction principles, historical development and performance, and discuss the current trend towards simplification and miniaturization of sample preparation and decreasing the quantities of organic solvents used.
Abstract: The development of faster, simpler, inexpensive and more environmentally-friendly sample-preparation techniques is an important issue in chemical analysis. Recent research trends involve miniaturization of the traditional liquid-liquid-extraction principle by greatly reducing the acceptor-to-donor ratio. The current trend is towards simplification and miniaturization of sample preparation and decreasing the quantities of organic solvents used. We discuss liquid-phase microextraction with the focus on extraction principles, historical development and performance.

698 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: USAEME is proposed as an efficient, fast, simple and non-expensive alternative to other extraction techniques such as SPE, SPME and LPME for the analysis of environmental waters including bottled, tap, river, municipal swimming pool, sewage and seaport water samples.

513 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new and versatile liquid-phase microextraction method is described that is affordable, efficient, and convenient for extraction and determination of low concentrations of PAHs in water samples.

471 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An analytical technique is described which combines solvent extraction with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis in a simple and inexpensive apparatus involving very little solvent consumption and is in good agreement with a convective-diffusive kinetic model.
Abstract: An analytical technique is described which combines solvent extraction with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis in a simple and inexpensive apparatus involving very little solvent consumption. A small drop (8 μL) of a water-immiscible organic solvent, containing an internal standard, is located at the end of a Teflon rod which is immersed in a stirred aqueous sample solution. After the solution has been stirred for a prescribed period of time, the probe is withdrawn from the aqueous solution, and the organic phase is sampled with a microsyringe and injected into the GC for quantification. The observed rate of solvent extraction is in good agreement with a convective−diffusive kinetic model. Analytically, the relative standard deviation of the method is 1.7% for a 5.00-min extraction of the analyte 4-methylacetophenone into n-octane.

1,191 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This unique microextraction system is simple and flexible, permits automated backwashing, consumes only microquantities of organic solvents, and is capable of being coupled with other analytical systems.
Abstract: An organic microdrop (∼1.3 μL) is suspended inside a flowing aqueous drop from which the analyte is extracted. The drop-in-drop system is achieved by a multitube assembly. The aqueous phase is continuously delivered to the outer drop and is aspirated away from the bottom meniscus of the drop. After the sampling/extraction period, a wash solution replaces the sample/reagent in the aqueous layer, resulting in a clear outer aqueous drop housing a colored organic drop containing the extracted material. This also results in an automatic backwash. The color intensity of the organic drop, related to the analyte concentration, is monitored by a light-emitting diode based absorbance detector. After the analytical cycle, the organic drop is removed and replaced by a new one. The performance of the system is illustrated with the determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate (a methylene blue active substance) extracted as an ion pair into chloroform. This unique microextraction system is simple and flexible, permits autom...

697 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, two modes of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) were developed for capillary gas chromatography, i.e., static and dynamic LPME, which involve the use of very small amounts of organic solvent in a conventional microsyringe.
Abstract: Two modes of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) were developed for capillary gas chromatography. Both methodologies, i.e., static LPME and dynamic LPME, involve the use of very small amounts of organic solvent (<2 μL) in a conventional microsyringe. The performance of the two techniques is demonstrated in the determination of two chlorobenzenes extracted into a single drop of toluene by the use of a 10-μL syringe. Static LPME provided some enrichment (∼12-fold), good reproducibility (9.7%), and simplicity but suffered relatively long extraction time (15 min). Dynamic LPME provided higher (∼27-fold) enrichment within much shorter extraction time (∼3 min), and relatively poorer precision (12.8%), primarily due to repeated manual manipulation. Both methods allow the direct transfer of extracted analytes into a gas chromatograph.

648 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the amount of a sample compound extracted into a 1-μL drop of n-octane suspended in a stirred aqueous solution from the tip of a microsyringe needle.
Abstract: The amount of a sample compound extracted into a 1-μL drop of n-octane suspended in a stirred aqueous solution from the tip of a microsyringe needle is measured by gas chromatography (GC) as a function of time. The observed extraction rate curve is first order and yields the overall mass transfer coefficient for the sample compound, βo. For a given compound, βo varies linearly with stirring rate. Among the four compounds malathion, 4-methylacetophenone, 4-nitrotoluene, and progesterone, at a given stirring rate, βo is linearly proportional to the diffusion coefficient of the compound (Daq). This supports the film theory of convective−diffusive mass transfer, as opposed to the penetration theory. The relative standard deviation of the GC signal for 4-methylacetophenone after a 1.00 min extraction at 1500 rpm is 1.5%, which suggests that the system exhibits excellent potential as a tool for rapid analysis by solvent extraction/GC.

531 citations