Determination of sample size using power analysis and optimum bin size of histogram features
Citations
1 citations
Cites background or methods from "Determination of sample size using ..."
...…sets in such a way that training, and storage in the case of instance-based learning, can be effected on fewer instances with minor impact on the overall accuracy of the induced models (Wilson and Martinez, 2000; Czarnowski and Jedrzejowicz, 2005, 2006; Son and Kim, 2006; Indira et al., 2011)....
[...]
...Instance reduction techniques, for example, have been used to prune training sets in such a way that training, and storage in the case of instance-based learning, can be effected on fewer instances with minor impact on the overall accuracy of the induced models (Wilson and Martinez, 2000; Czarnowski and Jedrzejowicz, 2005, 2006; Son and Kim, 2006; Indira et al., 2011)....
[...]
References
115,069 citations
"Determination of sample size using ..." refers methods in this paper
...The Pillai’s V trace is given by 1 1 ( ) 1 h i ii V trace BT λ λ − = = = +∑ (1) where λi is the ith Eigen value of W-1B in which W is the within-group variance and h is the number of factors being considered in MANOVA, defined by h = c – 1and c is the number of classes....
[...]
...In case of multi-class problem (number of classes greater than two), instead of t-statistic, the F-statistic measure derived from Pillai’s V formula (Olson, 1974; Cohen, 1969) is used for the estimation of sample size....
[...]
...It is a statistical measure often used in multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) (Cohen, 1969, 1988)....
[...]
...The test was priori sample size computation of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with repeated measures and within-between interactions....
[...]
49,129 citations
"Determination of sample size using ..." refers methods in this paper
...The Pillai’s V trace is given by 1 1 ( ) 1 h i ii V trace BT λ λ − = = = +∑ (1) where λi is the ith Eigen value of W-1B in which W is the within-group variance and h is the number of factors being considered in MANOVA, defined by h = c – 1and c is the number of classes....
[...]
...The experimental setup, fault simulation and experimental procedure are explained in detail in Sugumaran et al. (2008) and Cohen (1988)....
[...]
...It is a statistical measure often used in multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) (Cohen, 1969, 1988)....
[...]
...The test was priori sample size computation of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with repeated measures and within-between interactions....
[...]
40,195 citations
Additional excerpts
...…Kupper, 1990; Streiner, 1994; Beal, 1989; Dupont, 1988), paired samples (Parker and Bregman, 1986; Nam, 1992; Lu and Bean, 1995; Lachenbruch, 1992; Lachin, 1992; Royston, 1993; Nam, 1997; Donner and Eliasziw, 1992), measurement of agreement (Birkett and Day, 1994), and power (Faul et al., 2007)....
[...]
..., 1988; Whitehead, 1993; Roebruck and Kuhn, 1995; Lubin and Gail, 1990; Lakatos and Lan, 1992), for time-to-event (survival) data (Schoenfeld and Richter, 1982; Hanley and McNeil, 1982), for receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis (Obuchowski, 1994; Obuchowski and McClish, 1997; Whittemore, 1981), for logistic and Poisson regression (Hsieh, 1989; Flack and Eudey, 1993; Bull, 1993; Signorini, 1991; Lui and Cumberland, 1992), repeated measurements (Lipsitz and Fitzmaurice, 1994; Greenland, 1988), precision (Samuels and Lu, 1992; Buderer, 1996; Satten and Kupper, 1990; Streiner, 1994; Beal, 1989; Dupont, 1988), paired samples (Parker and Bregman, 1986; Nam, 1992; Lu and Bean, 1995; Lachenbruch, 1992; Lachin, 1992; Royston, 1993; Nam, 1997; Donner and Eliasziw, 1992), measurement of agreement (Birkett and Day, 1994), and power (Faul et al., 2007)....
[...]
19,398 citations
Additional excerpts
...…1993; Roebruck and Kuhn, 1995; Lubin and Gail, 1990; Lakatos and Lan, 1992), for time-to-event (survival) data (Schoenfeld and Richter, 1982; Hanley and McNeil, 1982), for receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis (Obuchowski, 1994; Obuchowski and McClish, 1997; Whittemore, 1981), for…...
[...]
..., 1988; Whitehead, 1993; Roebruck and Kuhn, 1995; Lubin and Gail, 1990; Lakatos and Lan, 1992), for time-to-event (survival) data (Schoenfeld and Richter, 1982; Hanley and McNeil, 1982), for receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis (Obuchowski, 1994; Obuchowski and McClish, 1997; Whittemore, 1981), for logistic and Poisson regression (Hsieh, 1989; Flack and Eudey, 1993; Bull, 1993; Signorini, 1991; Lui and Cumberland, 1992), repeated measurements (Lipsitz and Fitzmaurice, 1994; Greenland, 1988), precision (Samuels and Lu, 1992; Buderer, 1996; Satten and Kupper, 1990; Streiner, 1994; Beal, 1989; Dupont, 1988), paired samples (Parker and Bregman, 1986; Nam, 1992; Lu and Bean, 1995; Lachenbruch, 1992; Lachin, 1992; Royston, 1993; Nam, 1997; Donner and Eliasziw, 1992), measurement of agreement (Birkett and Day, 1994), and power (Faul et al....
[...]
16,435 citations