Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.Abstract:
Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council9s evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidanceread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
David Moher,Larissa Shamseer,Mike Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Paul G. Shekelle,Lesley A. Stewart +7 more
TL;DR: A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015 Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
David Moher,Larissa Shamseer,Michael Clarke,Davina Ghersi,Alessandro Liberati,Mark Petticrew,Lesley A. Stewart +6 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
Tammy Hoffmann,Paul Glasziou,Isabelle Boutron,Ruairidh Milne,Rafael Perera,David Moher,Douglas G. Altman,Virginia Barbour,Helen Macdonald,Marie Johnston,Sarah E Lamb,Mary Dixon-Woods,Peter McCulloch,Jeremy C Wyatt,An-Wen Chan,Susan Michie +15 more
TL;DR: The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions
Susan Michie,Michelle Richardson,Marie Johnston,Marie Johnston,Charles Abraham,Jill J Francis,Wendy Hardeman,Martin P Eccles,James E. Cane,Caroline E Wood +9 more
TL;DR: “BCT taxonomy v1,” an extensive taxonomy of 93 consensually agreed, distinct BCTs, offers a step change as a method for specifying interventions, but the authors anticipate further development and evaluation based on international, interdisciplinary consensus.
Journal ArticleDOI
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Graham Moore,Suzanne Audrey,Mary Barker,Lyndal Bond,Chris Bonell,Wendy Hardeman,Laurence Moore,Alicia O’Cathain,Tannaze Tinati,Daniel Wight,Janis Baird +10 more
TL;DR: New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies that will help improve the quality of decision-making in the design and testing of complex interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
E von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +6 more
TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Erik von Elm,Douglas G. Altman,Matthias Egger,Stuart J. Pocock,Peter C Gøtzsche,Jan P. Vandenbroucke +5 more
TL;DR: In this article, a group of methodologists, researchers, and journal editors sets out guidelines to improve reports of observational studies, which hampers assessment and makes it less useful.
Journal ArticleDOI
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Michelle Campbell,Ray Fitzpatrick,Andy Haines,Ann Louise Kinmonth,Peter Sandercock,David Spiegelhalter,Peter Tyrer +6 more
TL;DR: The design and execution of research required to address the additional problems resulting from evaluation of complex interventions, those “made up of various interconnecting parts,” are examined.