Diabetic kidneys can safely expand the donor pool.
TL;DR: The data suggest that diabetic kidneys can be safely used without risk to patient or graft survival, and long-term graft survival and patient survival were similar among groups.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The demand for organs has increased exponentially with a new name added to the United States waiting list every 16 min. As such, kidneys from medically marginal donors are being considered for transplantation more frequently, including kidneys from individuals already at risk for renal disease, e.g., diabetic donors. METHODS: We compared outcomes when using kidneys from donors with type 1 diabetes mellitus (D1) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (D2) at our center as a function of time. All patients with available data who underwent renal transplantation were evaluated (n=2013). RESULTS: Forty-two individuals were recipients of D1 or D2 donor kidneys. Thirty of these individuals did not have diabetes (R0). All patients received quadruple sequential immunosuppression with cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK506). Donor serum creatinine (Scr) values were not significantly different. D2 kidneys came from older donors (mean age, 56+/-10.4 years; P< or =0.01 vs. D1 and D0 donors). Mean discharge Scr was greater in nondiabetic D2 recipients (D2/R0, 2.45+/-1.3 mg/dl; P=0.0016 vs. D0/R0), and transplantation of D1 or D2 kidneys was associated with a significantly increased frequency of posttransplant proteinuria (P=0.0089). Interestingly, R0 recipients of D1 or D2 kidneys were more likely to initiate oral hypoglycemic therapy after transplant (P=0.04). However, rejection episodes were not significantly different among groups, and long-term graft survival and patient survival were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that diabetic kidneys can be safely used without risk to patient or graft survival. Preexisting diabetic injury in the donor may increase the risk for proteinuria, compromised renal function, and posttransplant glucose intolerance.
Citations
More filters
01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: It is strongly believed that the implementation of these pathways for obtaining organs from the living and the dead donors, with appropriate consideration of the ethical, religious and social criteria of the society, the organ shortage crisis will be eliminated and many lives will be saved through the process of organ donation and transplantation.
Abstract: The demand for organ transplantation has rapidly increased all over the world during the past decade due to the increased incidence of vital organ failure, the rising success and greater improvement in posttransplant outcome. However, the unavailability of adequate organs for transplantation to meet the existing demand has resulted in major organ shortage crises. As a result there has been a major increase in the number of patients on transplant waiting lists as well as in the number of patients dying while on the waiting list. In the United States, for example, the number of patients on the waiting list in the year 2006 had risen to over 95,000, while the number of patient deaths was over 6,300. This organ shortage crisis has deprived thousands of patients of a new and better quality of life and has caused a substantial increase in the cost of alternative medical care such as dialysis. There are several procedures and pathways which have been shown to provide practical and effective solutions to this crisis. These include implementation of appropriate educational programs for the public and hospital staff regarding the need and benefits of organ donation, the appropriate utilization of marginal (extended criteria donors), acceptance of paired organ donation, the acceptance of the concept of "presumed consent," implementation of a system of "rewarded gifting" for the family of the diseased donor and also for the living donor, developing an altruistic system of donation from a living donor to an unknown recipient, and accepting the concept of a controlled system of financial payment for the donor. As is outlined in this presentation, we strongly believe that the implementation of these pathways for obtaining organs from the living and the dead donors, with appropriate consideration of the ethical, religious and social criteria of the society, the organ shortage crisis will be eliminated and many lives will be saved through the process of organ donation and transplantation.
325 citations
TL;DR: The terms extended donor or expanded donor mean changes in donor acceptability criteria and in almost all cases, the negative connotations of these terms cannot be justified.
Abstract: The terms extended donor or expanded donor mean changes in donor acceptability criteria. In almost all cases, the negative connotations of these terms cannot be justified. Factors considered to affect donor or organ acceptability have changed with time, after showing that they did not negatively affect graft or patient survival per se or when the adequate measures had been adopted. There is no age limit to be an organ donor. Kidney and liver transplantation from donors older than 65 years can have excellent graft and patient actuarial survival and graft function. Using these donors can be from an epidemiological point of view the most important factor to esablish the final number of cadaveric liver and kidney transplantations. Organs with broad structural parenchyma lesion with preserved functional reserve and organs with reversible functional impairment can be safely transplanted. Bacterial and fungal donor infection with the adequate antibiotic treatment of donor and/or recipient prevents infection in the latter. The organs, including the liver, from donors with infection by the hepatitis B and C viruses can be safely transplanted to recipients with infection by the same viruses, respectively. Poisoned donors and non-heart-beating donors, grafts from transplant recipients, reuse of grafts, domino transplant and splitting of one liver for two recipients can be an important and safe source of organs for transplantation.
153 citations
Cites background from "Diabetic kidneys can safely expand ..."
...For diabetes mellitus, other authors with a more precise analysis did not find any short and long-term graft and patient survival differences with kidneys from diabetic donors compared with kidneys from non-diabetic donors (42)....
[...]
TL;DR: The use of ECD kidneys at the authors' center effectively doubled their transplant volume within 1 year, and a systematic approach to E CD kidneys based on nephron mass matching and nephrons sparing measures may provide optimal utilization with short-term outcomes and renal function comparable to SCD kidneys.
Abstract: Objective:To compare outcomes in recipients of expanded criteria donor (ECD) versus standard criteria donor (SCD) kidneys at a single center using a standardized approach with similar immunosuppression.Summary Background Data:Expanded criteria deceased organ donors (ECD) are a source of kidneys that
124 citations
TL;DR: Aggressive hemodynamic and respiratory management of solid organ donors, coupled with the use of hormonal therapy improves the rate of conversion and graft survival in solid organ recipients.
Abstract: Over the past two decades, the demand for donor organs continues to outpace the number of organs available for transplantation. Parallel with this has been a change in the demographics of organ donors with an increase in older donors and donors with marginal organs as a proportion of the total organ donor pool. Consequently, efforts have been made to improve the medical care delivered to potential organ donors to improve the conversion rate and graft survival of available organs. The purpose of this literature review is to provide updated recommendations for the contemporary management of organ donors after the neurological determination of death in order to maximize the probability of recipient graft survival. A comprehensive review of the literature obtained through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, and personal reference files. Contemporary management of the organ donor after neurological determination of death includes therapies to prevent the detrimental effects of the autonomic storm, the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring and aggressive respiratory therapy including therapeutic bronchoscopy in marginal heart and lung donors, and the use of hormonal therapy including vasopressin, corticosteroids, triiodothyronine or thyroxine, and insulin for the pituitary failure and inflammation seen in brain dead organ donors. The importance of normalizing donor physiology to optimize all available organs is stressed. Aggressive hemodynamic and respiratory management of solid organ donors, coupled with the use of hormonal therapy improves the rate of conversion and graft survival in solid organ recipients.
95 citations
51 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, kidney function and performed renal biopsies before pancreas transplantation and 5 and 10 years thereafter in eight patients with type 1 diabetes but without uremia who had mild to advanced lesions of diabetic nephropathy at the time of transplantation.
Abstract: Background In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who do not have uremia and have not received a kidney transplant, pancreas transplantation does not ameliorate established lesions of diabetic nephropathy within five years after transplantation, but the effects of longer periods of normoglycemia are unknown. Methods We studied kidney function and performed renal biopsies before pancreas transplantation and 5 and 10 years thereafter in eight patients with type 1 diabetes but without uremia who had mild to advanced lesions of diabetic nephropathy at the time of transplantation. The biopsy samples were analyzed morphometrically. Results All patients had persistently normal glycosylated hemoglobin values after transplantation. The median urinary albumin excretion rate was 103 mg per day before transplantation, 30 mg per day 5 years after transplantation, and 20 mg per day 10 years after transplantation (P=0.07 for the comparison of values at base line and at 5 years; P=0.11 for the comparison between base ...
994 citations
TL;DR: Patients receiving a renal cadaveric transplantation have a substantial survival advantage over corresponding end-stage renal disease patients on the waiting list even in the setting of a single transplantation center where mortality on regular dialysis therapy was comparatively low.
Abstract: Despite a superior quality of life and a favorable cost effectiveness, it has not been well established thus far whether renal cadaveric transplantation contributes to superior survival probability of end-stage renal disease patients in Europe, because the mortality rate on dialysis is lower compared with the United States. This analysis was undertaken to compare the mortality of wait-listed patients and transplant recipients during long-term follow-up, including the possibility of a retransplant in a single-center study. The study cohort included 309 consecutive patients, ages 17 to 72 yr, being registered on the waiting list of the Renal Transplantation Center of Mannheim since the initiation of the transplantation program on June 3, 1989. Follow-up was terminated on September 30, 1997, with a mean of 4.15 yr. A total of 144 renal cadaveric transplants (four retransplants) was performed during the follow-up period. A Cox regression model considering the time-dependent exposure to the different therapy modalities was applied for statistical analysis. Patients being removed from the waiting list or coming back to dialysis after transplantation were censored at time of withdrawal or graft failure. Transplantation resulted in a lower hazard ratio, which was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.87) when the hazard of the wait-listed group was taken as 1.00. The underlying incidence rate of death was 0.026 per patient-year (0.032 on dialysis versus 0.016 with functioning graft). Performing the evaluation on an intention-to-treat basis without censoring the lower risk of the transplanted group was still pronounced according to a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.89). Thus, patients receiving a renal cadaveric transplantation have a substantial survival advantage over corresponding end-stage renal disease patients on the waiting list even in the setting of a single transplantation center where mortality on regular dialysis therapy was comparatively low.
449 citations
"Diabetic kidneys can safely expand ..." refers background in this paper
...There is no question that the benefits of transplantation in prolonging life span (11, 12) and improving quality of life (13) in patients with ESRD minimizes the potential negative effects of donor disease, e....
[...]
TL;DR: Pancreas transplantation can reverse the lesions of diabetic nephropathy, but reversal requires more than five years of normoglycemia.
Abstract: Background In patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who do not have uremia and have not received a kidney transplant, pancreas transplantation does not ameliorate established lesions of diabetic nephropathy within five years after transplantation, but the effects of longer periods of normoglycemia are unknown. Methods We studied kidney function and performed renal biopsies before pancreas transplantation and 5 and 10 years thereafter in eight patients with type 1 diabetes but without uremia who had mild to advanced lesions of diabetic nephropathy at the time of transplantation. The biopsy samples were analyzed morphometrically. Results All patients had persistently normal glycosylated hemoglobin values after transplantation. The median urinary albumin excretion rate was 103 mg per day before transplantation, 30 mg per day 5 years after transplantation, and 20 mg per day 10 years after transplantation (P=0.07 for the comparison of values at base line and at 5 years; P=0.11 for the comparison between base ...
393 citations
"Diabetic kidneys can safely expand ..." refers background in this paper
...Moreover, such a strategy has been worthwhile to consider on the basis of data that suggest that normoglycemia could actually reverse the histopathologic changes of diabetic nephropathy (8)....
[...]
TL;DR: Although significant quality-of-life differences were evident across treatment groups, the types of patients representative of the various RRTs also differed significantly in terms of case-mix variables relevant to psychosocial well-being and emotional distress.
325 citations
"Diabetic kidneys can safely expand ..." refers background in this paper
...There is no question that the benefits of transplantation in prolonging life span (11, 12) and improving quality of life (13) in patients with ESRD minimizes the potential negative effects of donor disease, e....
[...]
TL;DR: Renal biopsy specimens taken 7 months after transplantation showed almost complete resolution of the nephropathy and both patients remain free from proteinuria after a further 7 months, indicating that longstanding type 1 diabetes need not always contraindicate kidney donation.
275 citations